Abstract: Plastic as an environmental burden is a well-rehearsed topic in the research area. This is due to its global demand and destructive impacts on the environment, which has been a significant concern to the governments. Typically, the use of plastic in the construction industry is seen across low-density, non-structural applications due to its diverse range of benefits including high strength-to-weight ratios, manipulability and durability. It can be said that with the level of plastic consumption experienced in the construction industry, an ongoing responsibility is shown for this sector to continually innovate alternatives for application of recycled plastic waste such as using plastic made replacement from polyethylene, polystyrene, polyvinyl and polypropylene in the concrete mix design. In this study, the impact of partially replaced fine aggregate with polypropylene in the concrete mix design was investigated to evaluate the concrete’s compressive strength by conducting an experimental work which comprises of six concrete mix batches with polypropylene replacements ranging from 0.5 to 3.0%. The results demonstrated a typical decline in the compressive strength with the addition of plastic aggregate, despite this reduction generally mitigated as the level of plastic in the concrete mix increased. Furthermore, two of the six plastic-containing concrete mixes tested in the current study exceeded the ST5 standardised prescribed concrete mix compressive strength requirement at 28-days containing 1.50% and 2.50% plastic aggregates, which demonstrated the potential for use of recycled polypropylene in structural applications, as a partial by mass, fine aggregate replacement in the concrete mix.
Abstract: This study investigates the suitability of using plastic,
such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), as a partial replacement of
natural coarse and fine aggregates (for example, brick chips and
natural sand) to produce lightweight concrete for load bearing
structural members. The plastic coarse aggregate (PCA) and plastic
fine aggregate (PFA) were produced from melted polyethylene
terephthalate (PET) bottles. Tests were conducted using three
different water–cement (w/c) ratios, such as 0.42, 0.48, and 0.57,
where PCA and PFA were used as 50% replacement of coarse and
fine aggregate respectively. Fresh and hardened properties of
concrete have been compared for natural aggregate concrete (NAC),
PCA concrete (PCC) and PFA concrete (PFC). The compressive
strength of concrete at 28 days varied with the water–cement ratio for
both the PCC and PFC. Between PCC and PFC, PFA concrete
showed the highest compressive strength (23.7 MPa) at 0.42 w/c ratio
and also the lowest compressive strength (13.7 MPa) at 0.57 w/c
ratio. Significant reduction in concrete density was mostly observed
for PCC samples, ranging between 1977–1924 kg/m³. With the
increase in water–cement ratio PCC achieved higher workability
compare to both NAC and PFC. It was found that both the PCA and
PFA contained concrete achieved the required compressive strength
to be used for structural purpose as partial replacement of the natural
aggregate; but to obtain the desired lower density as lightweight
concrete the PCA is most suited.