Abstract: Any signal transmitted over a channel is corrupted by noise and interference. A host of channel coding techniques has been proposed to alleviate the effect of such noise and interference. Among these Turbo codes are recommended, because of increased capacity at higher transmission rates and superior performance over convolutional codes. The multimedia elements which are associated with ample amount of data are best protected by Turbo codes. Turbo decoder employs Maximum A-posteriori Probability (MAP) and Soft Output Viterbi Decoding (SOVA) algorithms. Conventional Turbo coded systems employ Equal Error Protection (EEP) in which the protection of all the data in an information message is uniform. Some applications involve Unequal Error Protection (UEP) in which the level of protection is higher for important information bits than that of other bits. In this work, enhancement to the traditional Log MAP decoding algorithm is being done by using optimized scaling factors for both the decoders. The error correcting performance in presence of UEP in Additive White Gaussian Noise channel (AWGN) and Rayleigh fading are analyzed for the transmission of image with Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) as source coding technique. This paper compares the performance of log MAP, Modified log MAP (MlogMAP) and Enhanced log MAP (ElogMAP) algorithms used for image transmission. The MlogMAP algorithm is found to be best for lower Eb/N0 values but for higher Eb/N0 ElogMAP performs better with optimized scaling factors. The performance comparison of AWGN with fading channel indicates the robustness of the proposed algorithm. According to the performance of three different message classes, class3 would be more protected than other two classes. From the performance analysis, it is observed that ElogMAP algorithm with UEP is best for transmission of an image compared to Log MAP and MlogMAP decoding algorithms.
Abstract: In this paper, we propose use of convolutional codes
for file dispersal. The proposed method is comparable in complexity
to the information Dispersal Algorithm proposed by M.Rabin and for
particular choices of (non-binary) convolutional codes, is almost as
efficient as that algorithm in terms of controlling expansion in the
total storage. Further, our proposed dispersal method allows string
search.
Abstract: This paper introduces two decoders for binary linear
codes based on Metaheuristics. The first one uses a genetic algorithm
and the second is based on a combination genetic algorithm with
a feed forward neural network. The decoder based on the genetic
algorithms (DAG) applied to BCH and convolutional codes give good
performances compared to Chase-2 and Viterbi algorithm respectively
and reach the performances of the OSD-3 for some Residue
Quadratic (RQ) codes. This algorithm is less complex for linear
block codes of large block length; furthermore their performances
can be improved by tuning the decoder-s parameters, in particular the
number of individuals by population and the number of generations.
In the second algorithm, the search space, in contrast to DAG which
was limited to the code word space, now covers the whole binary
vector space. It tries to elude a great number of coding operations
by using a neural network. This reduces greatly the complexity of
the decoder while maintaining comparable performances.
Abstract: Two constructions of unit-memory binary convolutional
codes from linear block codes over the finite semi-local ring F2r +vF2r , where v2 = v, are presented. In both cases, if the linear block code is systematic, then the resulting convolutional encoder
is systematic, minimal, basic and non-catastrophic. The Hamming
free distance of the convolutional code is bounded below by the
minimum Hamming distance of the block code. New examples of
binary convolutional codes that meet the Heller upper bound for
systematic codes are given.
Abstract: In this paper, the performance of three types of serial
concatenated convolutional codes (SCCC) is compared and analyzed
in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel. In Type I, only the
parity bits of outer encoder are passed to inner encoder. In Type II and
Type III, both the information bits and the parity bits of outer encoder
are transferred to inner encoder. As results of simulation, Type I shows
the best bit error rate (BER) performance at low signal-to-noise ratio
(SNR). On the other hand, Type III shows the best BER performance
at high SNR in AWGN channel. The simulation results are analyzed
using the distance spectrum.