Abstract: Selenium is an-antioxidant which is important for
human health enters food chain through crops. In Kenya Zea mays is
consumed by 96% of population hence is a cheap and convenient
method to provide selenium to large number of population. Several
soil factors are known to have antagonistic effects on selenium
speciation hence the uptake by Zea mays. There are no studies in
Kenya that has been done to determine the effects of soil
characteristics (pH, Tcarbon, CEC, Eh) affect accumulation of
selenium in Zea mays grains in Maize Belt in Kenya. About 100 Zea mays grain samples together with 100 soil samples
were collected from the study site put in separate labeled Ziplocs and
were transported to laboratories at room temperature for analysis.
Maize grains were analyzed for selenium while soil samples were
analyzed for pH, Cat Ion Exchange Capacity, total carbon, and
electrical conductivity. The mean selenium in Zea mays grains varied from 1.82 ± 0.76
mg/Kg to 11±0.86 mg/Kg. There was no significant difference
between selenium levels between different grain batches {χ (Df =76)
= 26.04 P= 1.00} The pH levels varied from 5.43± 0.58 to 5.85±
0.32. No significant correlations between selenium in grains and soil
pH (Pearson’s correlations = - 0.143), and between selenium levels in
grains and the four (pH, Tcarbon, CEC, Eh) soil chemical
characteristics {F (4,91) = 0.721 p = 0.579} was observed. It can be concluded that the soil chemical characteristics in the
study site did not significantly affect the accumulation of native
selenium in Zea mays grains.
Abstract: Results of a field study carried out at Trinitapoli (Puglia region, southern Italy) on the irrigation of an artichoke crop with three types of water (secondary-treated wastewater, SW; tertiary-treated wastewater, TW; and freshwater, FW) are reported. Physical, chemical and microbiological analyses were performed on the irrigation water, and on soil and yield samples.
The levels of most of the chemical parameters, such as electrical conductivity, total suspended solids, Na+, Ca2+, Mg+2, K+, sodium adsorption ratio, chemical oxygen demand, biological oxygen demand over 5 days, NO3 –N, total N, CO32, HCO3, phenols and chlorides of the applied irrigation water were significantly higher in SW compared to GW and TW. No differences were found for Mg2+, PO4-P, K+ only between SW and TW. Although the chemical parameters of the three irrigation water sources were different, few effects on the soil were observed. Even though monitoring of Escherichia coli showed high SW levels, which were above the limits allowed under Italian law (DM 152/2006), contamination of the soil and the marketable yield were never observed. Moreover, no Salmonella spp. were detected in these irrigation waters; consequently, they were absent in the plants. Finally, the data on the quantitative-qualitative parameters of the artichoke yield with the various treatments show no significant differences between the three irrigation water sources. Therefore, if adequately treated, municipal wastewater can be used for irrigation and represents a sound alternative to conventional water resources.