Top Journal

International Journal of Architectural, Civil and Construction Sciences International Journal of Biological, Life and Agricultural Sciences International Journal of Chemical, Materials and Biomolecular Sciences International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences International Journal of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences International Journal of Electrical, Electronic and Communication Sciences International Journal of Engineering, Mathematical and Physical Sciences International Journal of Medical, Medicine and Health Sciences International Journal of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace Sciences International Journal of Information, Control and Computer Sciences

SUGGEST A JOURNAL

Join Scholarly today, and help us improve Open Access Journal database.

+ Sign Up

Advanced Search

Replacing MOSFETs with Single Electron Transistors (SET) to Reduce Power Consumption of an Inverter Circuit

Year: 2015 Volume: 9 Issue: 3 405 - 410 Pages

Abstract: According to the rules of quantum mechanics there is a non-vanishing probability of for an electron to tunnel through a thin insulating barrier or a thin capacitor which is not possible according to the laws of classical physics. Tunneling of electron through a thin insulating barrier or tunnel junction is a random event and the magnitude of current flowing due to the tunneling of electron is very low. As the current flowing through a Single Electron Transistor (SET) is the result of electron tunneling through tunnel junctions of its source and drain the supply voltage requirement is also very low. As a result, the power consumption across a Single Electron Transistor is ultra-low in comparison to that of a MOSFET. In this paper simulations have been done with PSPICE for an inverter built with both SETs and MOSFETs. 35mV supply voltage was used for a SET built inverter circuit and the supply voltage used for a CMOS inverter was 3.5V.

Axiomatic Systems as an Alternative to Teach Physics

Year: 2016 Volume: 10 Issue: 8 388 - 391 Pages

Abstract: In the last few years, students from higher education have difficulties in grasping mathematical concepts which support physical matters, especially those in the first years of this education. Classical Physics teaching turns to be complex when students are not able to make use of mathematical tools which lead to the conceptual structure of Physics. When derivation and integration rules are not used or developed in parallel with other disciplines, the physical meaning that we attempt to convey turns to be complicated. Due to this fact, it could be of great use to see the Classical Mechanics from an axiomatic approach, where the correspondence rules give physical meaning, if we expect students to understand concepts clearly and accurately. Using the Minkowski point of view adapted to a two-dimensional space and time where vectors, matrices, and straight lines (worked from an affine space) give mathematical and physical rigorosity even when it is more abstract. An interesting option would be to develop the disciplinary contents from an axiomatic version which embraces the Classical Mechanics as a particular case of Relativistic Mechanics. The observation about the increase in the difficulties stated by students in the first years of education allows this idea to grow as a possible option to improve performance and understanding of the concepts of this subject.