Torsion Behavior of Steel Fibered High Strength Self Compacting Concrete Beams Reinforced by GFRB Bars

This paper investigates experimentally and
analytically the torsion behavior of steel fibered high strength self
compacting concrete beams reinforced by GFRP bars. Steel fibered
high strength self compacting concrete (SFHSSCC) and GFRP bars
became in the recent decades a very important materials in the
structural engineering field. The use of GFRP bars to replace steel
bars has emerged as one of the many techniques put forward to
enhance the corrosion resistance of reinforced concrete structures.
High strength concrete and GFRP bars attract designers and
architects as it allows improving the durability as well as the esthetics
of a construction. One of the trends in SFHSSCC structures is to
provide their ductile behavior and additional goal is to limit
development and propagation of macro-cracks in the body of
SFHSSCC elements. SFHSSCC and GFRP bars are tough, improve
the workability, enhance the corrosion resistance of reinforced
concrete structures, and demonstrate high residual strengths after
appearance of the first crack. Experimental studies were carried out
to select effective fiber contents. Three types of volume fraction from
hooked shape steel fibers are used in this study, the hooked steel
fibers were evaluated in volume fractions ranging between 0.0%,
0.75% and 1.5%. The beams shape is chosen to create the required
forces (i.e. torsion and bending moments simultaneously) on the test
zone. A total of seven beams were tested, classified into three groups.
All beams, have 200cm length, cross section of 10×20cm,
longitudinal bottom reinforcement of 3





References:
<p>[1] Mansur M. A. &quot;Bending &ndash;torsion interaction for concrete beams with
steel fibers. Magzine of concrete research, London, Vol. 34, No. 121,
December 1982. pp 182-190.
[2] Mansur M. A. and Paramasivam P. &quot;Steel fiber reinforced concrete beams
in torsion, bending, and shear.&quot; Journal of American Concrete institute
proceeding, Vol. 82, No. 1, January-February 1985 pp. 33-39.
[3] Faza. S.S and Ganga Rao. H.V.S, (1992), bending and bond behavior
of concrete beams reinforced with fibre reinforced plastic rebars, WVDOH
-RP-83 phase 1report,west Virginia University, Morgantown, pp 128-173.
[4] Machida. A (1993), State-of-the-Art Report on Continuous Fiber
Reinforcing Materials, Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE), Tokyo, Japan,
[5] Nanni, A (1993), &quot;Flexural Behaviour and Design of RC Members
using FRP Reinforcement, &quot;Journal of the structural Engineering, ASCE, 1
19(11), pp 3344-3359.
[6] ACI 440R-96, &quot;State-of-the-Art Report on Fiber Reinforced
Plastic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures&quot;, Reported by ACI
Committee 440.
[7] Nawy. E.G and Neuwerth. G.E (1997), Fiberglass Reinforced Concrete
Slabs and Beams, Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 103(2).
[8] American Standard specifications for Fly Ash, ASTM C618 class F.(2)
[9] Egyptian Code Committee, &quot;Egyptian Code for Design and construction
of concrete structures&quot; code 203, second edition, 2004.
[10] Egyptian Standard specification for ordinary Portland cement (ESS
4756.-1-2006) , Produced from General Organization for specification
and Quality in Egypt. (1)
[11] Sivagamasundari, R (2008), &quot;Analytical and experimental study of
one way slabs reinforced with glass fibre polymer reinforcements&quot;,
Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Annamalai
University.
[12] Egyptian Standard specifications for aggregates, ESS 1109, 2008. (3)</p>