Authenticity Issues of Social Media: Credibility, Quality and Reality

Social media has led to paradigm shifts in ways people work and do business, interact and socialize, learn and obtain knowledge. So much so that social media has established itself as an important spatial extension of this nation-s historicity and challenges. Regardless of the enabling reputation and recommendation features through social networks embedded in the social media system, the overflow of broadcasted and publicized media contents turns the table around from engendering trust to doubting the trust system. When the trust is at doubt, the effects include deactivation of accounts and creation of multiple profiles, which lead to the overflow of 'ghost' contents (i.e. “the abundance of abandoned ships"). In most literature, the study of trust can be related to culture; hence the difference between Western-s “openness" and Eastern-s “blue-chip" concepts in networking and relationships. From a survey on issues and challenges among Malaysian social media users, 'authenticity' emerges as one of the main factors that causes and is caused by other factors. The other issue that has surfaced is credibility either in terms of message/content and source. Another is the quality of the knowledge that is shared. This paper explores the terrains of this critical space which in recent years has been dominated increasingly by, arguably, social networks embedded in the social media system, the overflow of broadcasted and publicized media content.

Authors:

• Shahrinaz Ismail
• Roslina Abdul Latif

Keywords:

• Authenticity
• credibility
• knowledge quality and social media.

References:

[1] F. Hamidi, M. Baljko, "Using Social Networks for Multicultural
Creative Collaboration," ICIC 2012, Bangaluru, India, March 21-23,
2012.
[2] A. Paslawsky, "The Growth of social media norms and Governments-
attempts at regulation," Fordham International Law Journal, vol. 1485,
2012.
[3] Google, "Google Policies and Principles Privacy Policy," Google
website. 2012.
[4] S. Ayers, "Trust, Anonymity and Authenticity", Connecting social care
and social media. 2012.
[5] M. Muller, K. Ehrlich, T. Matthews, A. Perer, I. Ronen, I. Guy,
"Diversity among enterprise online communities: collaborating, teaming
and innovating through Social Media," IBM Research CHI-12, May 5-
10, Austin, Texas, 2012.
[6] D. K. Wright, M. Hinson, "How blogs and Social Media are changing
public relations and the way it is practiced," Public Relations Journal,
vol. 2, no. 2, 2008.
[7] S. Messing, S. J. Westwood, "How Social Media Introduces Biases in
Selecting and Processing News Content," Stanford University, 2012.
[8] S. Kusumasondjaja, T. Shanka, C. Marchegiani, "Credibility of
onlinereviews and initial trust: The roles of reviewer-s identity and
review valence," Journal of Vacation Marketing, vol. 18, no. 3, 2012,
pp. 185-195.
[9] D. H. Park, J. Lee, I. Han, "The effect of online consumer reviews on
consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement,"
International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 11, no. 4, 2007, pp.
125-148.
[10] U. Gretzel K. H. Yoo, M. Purifoy, "Online Travel Review Study: Role
and Impact of Online Travel Reviews," College Station, TX: Laboratory
for Intelligent Systems in Tourism, Texas A&M University, 2007.
[11] U. Gretzel, D. R. Fesenmaier, J. T. O-Leary, "The transformation of
consumer behaviour," in Buhalis D. and Costa C. (eds) Tourism
Business Frontiers. Burlington, MA: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann,
2006, pp. 9-18.
[12] S. W. Litvin, R. E. Goldsmith, B. Pan, "Electronic word-of-mouth in
hospitality and tourism management," Tourism Management, vol. 29,
no. 3, 2008, pp. 458-468.
[13] R. W. Mack, J. Blose, B. Pan, "Believe it or not: credibility of blogs in
tourism," Journal of Vacation Marketing, vol. 14, no. 2, 2008, pp. 133-
144.
[14] V. P. Magnini, "The implications of company-sponsored messages
disguised as word-of-mouth," Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 25,
no. 4, 2011, pp. 243-251.
[15] J. Jacoby, J. J. Jaccard, I. Currim I, et al., "Tracing the impact of itemby-
item information accessing on uncertainty reduction," Journal of
Consumer Research, vol. 21, 1994, pp. 291-303.
[16] C. Pornpitakpan, "The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical
review of five decades evidence," Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
vol. 34, no. 2, 2004, pp. 243-281.
[17] S. W. Sussman, W. S. Seigal, "Informational influence in orgaizations:
an integrated approach to knowledge adoption," Information Systems
Research, vol. 14, no. 1, 2003, pp. 47-65.
[18] R. C. Mayer, J. H. Davis, F. D. Schoorman, "An integrative model of
organization trust", Acad Manage Rev, vol. 20, 1995, pp. 709-734.
[19] D. Gefen, "E-Commerce: The role of familiarity and trust," Omega-Int J
Manage Sci, vol. 28, 2000, pp. 725-737.
[20] S-W. Lin, Y-C. Liu, "The effects of motivations, trust and privacy
concern in social networking", Service Business: An International
Journal, Springer-Verlag, 2012, to be published.
[21] S. S. Sundar, "The Main model: A heuristic approach to understanding
technology effects on credibility", The John D. and Catherine T.
MacArthur Foundation series on Digital Media and Learning, 2008, pp.
73-100.
[22] M. Kang, 2010. "Measuring social media credibility: A study on a
Measure of Blog Credibility", Institute of Public Relations, 2010.
[23] R. N. Rimal, "Tapping into the social network", Bull World Health
Organ 2012, vol. 90410-11, 2012.
[24] California State University, "CSUEB Social Media Principles and
Engagement Guidelines", California State University East Bay website,
2012.
[25] Asian Banker Research, "Best Practices in Social Media Adoption in
Asia Pacific", Research Report, 23 August 2011.
[26] K. Lerman, "Social Browsing and Information Filtering in Social
Media," CoRR, vol. 0710.5697, 2007.
[27] Y. Zhang, W. W. Moe, "The Discontinuous Diffusion of User-
Generated Content," Social Science Research Network, 2012.