The Motivating and Limiting Factors of Learners’ Engagement in an Online Discussion Forum

Lately, asynchronous discussion forum is integrated in
higher educational institutions as it may increase learning process,
learners’ understanding, achievement and knowledge construction.
The asynchronous discussion forum is used to complement the
traditional, face-to-face learning session in hybrid learning courses.
However, studies have proven that students’ engagement in online
forums is still unconvincing. Thus, the aim of this study is to
investigate the motivating factors and obstacles that affect the
learners’ engagement in asynchronous discussion forum. This study
is carried out in one of the public higher educational institutions in
Malaysia with 18 postgraduate students as samples. The authors have
developed a 40-items questionnaire based on literature review. The
results indicate several factors that have encouraged or limited
students’ engagement in asynchronous discussion forum: (a) the
practices or behaviors of peers, or instructors, (b) the needs for the
discussions, (c) the learners’ personalities, (d) constraints in
continuing the discussion forum, (e) lack of ideas, (f) the level of
thoughts, (g) the level of knowledge construction, (h) technical
problems, (i) time constraints and (j) misunderstanding. This study
suggests some recommendations to increase the students’
engagement in online forums. Finally, based upon the findings, some
implications are proposed for further research.

• K. Durairaj
• I. N. Umar

• Asynchronous Discussion Forum
• Engagement
• Factors
• Motivating
• Limiting.

[1] S. Downes, 'Places to go: Connectivism \& connective
knowledge', Innovate: Journal of Online Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 2008.
[2] M. Balaji and D. Chakrabarti, 'Student interactions in online discussion
forum: Empirical research from ‘media richness theory’ perspective',
Journal of Interactive Online Learning, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1--22, 2010.
[3] R. Gafni and N. Geri, ‘The Value of Collaborative e-Learning:
Compulsory Versus Optional Online Forum Assignment’,
Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Learning and Learning Objects, vol. 6,
no. 1, pp. 343-335, 2010.
[4] B. De Wever, T. Schellens, M. Valcke and H. Van Keer, 'Content
analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous
discussion groups: A review', Computers \& Education, vol. 46, no. 1,
pp. 6--28, 2006.
[5] P. krish, 'Participation in Online Forums: Some Insight of Malaysian
Distance', 2010.
[6] A. Wise, J. Speer, F. Marbouti and Y. Hsiao, 'Broadening the notion of
participation in online discussions: Examining patterns in learners’
online listening behaviors', Instructional Science, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 323-
-343, 2013.
[7] K. Rollag, 'Teaching business cases online through discussion boards:
Strategies and best practices', Journal of Management Education, 2010.
[8] V. Peters and J. Hewitt, 'An investigation of student practices in
asynchronous computer conferencing courses', Computers \& Education,
vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 951--961, 2010.
[9] J. Hewitt, 'Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous
computer conferences', The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 14,
no. 4, pp. 567--589, 2005.
[10] A. Jeong and S. Frazier, 'How day of posting affects level of critical
discourse in asynchronous discussions and computer-supported
collaborative argumentation', British Journal of Educational
Technology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 875--887, 2008.
[11] E. Murphy and E. Coleman, 'Graduate students' experiences of
challenges in online asynchronous discussions', Canadian Journal of
Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de
la technologie, vol. 30, no. 2, 2004.
[12] C. Ng and W. Cheung, 'Comparing face to face, tutor led discussion and
online discussion in the classroom', Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 455, 2007.
[13] C. Chen, S. Pedersen and K. Murphy, 'The influence of perceived
information overload on student participation and knowledge
construction in computer-mediated communication', Instructional
Science, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 325--349, 2012.
[14] K. Hew and W. Cheung, Student participation in online discussions.
New York: Springer, 2012.
[15] D. Maor, 'Teacher's and students' perspectives on on-line learning in a
social constructivist learning environment', Technology, Pedagogy and
Education, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 201--218, 2003.
[16] M. Tallent-Runnels, J. Thomas, W. Lan, S. Cooper, T. Ahern, S. Shaw
and X. Liu, 'Teaching courses online: A review of the research', Review
of educational research, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 93--135, 2006.
[17] P. Reyes and P. Tchounikine, 'Supporting emergence of threaded
learning conversations through augmenting interactional and sequential
coherence', Springer, pp. 83--92, 2003.
[18] K. Meyer, 'Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time
and higher-order thinking', Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,
vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 55--65, 2003.
[19] X. Liu, B. Doore and L. Li, 'Scaffolding knowledge co-construction in
web-based discussions through message labeling', vol. 2008, no. 1, pp.
3041--3046, 2008.
[20] W. S. Cheung and K.F Hew, ‘Examining students’ creative and critical
thinking and student to student interactions in an asynchronous online
discussion environment: A singapore case study’, Asia-Pacific
Cybereducation Journal, vol 2, no.2, 2006.
[21] Y. Fung, 'Collaborative online learning: Interaction patterns and limiting
factors', Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning,
vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 135--149, 2004.
[22] Z. Yang and Q. Liu, ‘Research and development of web-based virtual
on-line classroom’, Computers & Education, vol.48, pp. 171–184, 2007.
[23] I.E. Allen and J. Seaman, ‘Learning on demand: Online education in the
United States, 2009’. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium, 2010.
[24] T. Schellens, H. Van Keer and M. Valcke, ‘The impact of role
assignment on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion
groups’, Small Group Research, vol 36, no.6, pp. 704–745, 2005.