Sustainability and Promotion of Inland Waterway Transportation Projects in Colombia: Case of the Magdalena River

Inland Waterway Transportation (IWT) is playing an
important role in national transport systems, water transportation is
considered to be safe, energy efficient and environmentally friendly
mode of transport, all benefits of IWT cause national awareness
increase, for instance the Colombian government is planning to
restore the navigability of the most important river of the country, the
Magdalena’s River navigability, embrace waterway transportation in
Colombia could strength competitiveness while reduce most of the
transport externalities. However, the current situation of the
Magdalena is deplorable, the most important river of Colombia has
been abandoned for decades and the solution is beyond of a single
administrative entity. This paper analyzes the outcomes of the
Navigation And Inland Waterway Action and Development in
Europe program (NAIADES) as a prospective to develop a similar
program in Colombia with similar objectives and guidelines,
considering sustainability, guarantying the long-term future results
and adaptability of the program. Identifying stakeholders and policy
experts, a set of individual interviews were carried out; findings
support the idea of lack of integration within governmental
institutions and lack of importance in marketing promotion as
possible drawbacks on the implementation of IWT projects.

• David Julian Bernal Melgarejo

• Inland waterway transportation
• Logistics
• Sustainability
• Multimodal transport systems
• Water transportation.

[1] Inter-american Development Bank, “Public-Private Collaboration on
Productive Development Policies in Colombia Public-Private
Collaboration on,” 2014.
[2] Ministerio de transporte de Colombia, “Diagnostico del transporte
2011,” 2011.
[3] ECLAC, “Environmental Performance Review Colombia Highlights
2014,” 2014.
[4] USACE, “U.S. Port and Inland Waterways Modernization,” 2012.
[5] S. Mihić, M. Mihajlovic, and I. Škiljaica, “European policy for the
promotion of inland waterway transport: A case study of the Danube
River,” vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 2498–2507, 2012.
[6] D. V Grier, “The Declining Reliability of the U.S. Inland Waterway
System.”
[7] G. D. Escobar, “Puerto Multimodal de La Dorada,” Rev. Eje 21, 2014.
[8] DNP, “Documento Conpes 3758,” Bogotá D.C, 2013.
[9] D. P. Dolowitz and D. Marsh, “Learning from Abroad: The Role of
Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making,” vol. 13, no. 1, 2000.
[10] C. Boyce and P. Neale, “Conducting In-Depth interviews: A Guide for
Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews,” 2006.
[11] T. Oisín, “Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Nonprobability
Sampling,” Polit. Sci. Polit., vol. 40, no. 4, p. 24, 2007.
[12] The European Commission, Communication from the commission on the
promotion of inland waterway transport “NAIADES.” 2006, pp. 1–15.
[13] The European Commission, “Mid-term progress report on the
implementation of the NAIADES Action Programme for the promotion
of inland waterway transport,” 2011.
[14] The European Commission, “Guidance document on Inland waterway
transport and Natura 2000,” 2012.
[15] Y. Mahieu, T. Eu, and C. Republic, “Transport networks concentrated
around economic hubs,” 2011.
[16] The European Commission, “Main Tables”. 2014. (Online). Available:
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/transport/data/main_ta
bles. (Accessed: 20-Apr-2014).
[17] D. Depietro, “Transport on the magdalena river: opportunities,
advantages, and institutional challenges.”
[18] Cormagdalena, “Plan de manejo de la cuenca del río Magdalena-Cauca,”
2007.
[19] A. Blackman, R. Morgenstern, and E. Topping, “Institutional Analysis of
Colombia’s Autonomous Regional Corporations (CARs),” 2006.