Survey on Strategic Games and Decision Making

Game theory is the study of how people interact and
make decisions to handle competitive situations. It has mainly been
developed to study decision making in complex situations. Humans
routinely alter their behaviour in response to changes in their social
and physical environment. As a consequence, the outcomes of
decisions that depend on the behaviour of multiple decision makers
are difficult to predict and require highly adaptive decision-making
strategies. In addition to the decision makers may have preferences
regarding consequences to other individuals and choose their actions
to improve or reduce the well-being of others. Nash equilibrium is a
fundamental concept in the theory of games and the most widely used
method of predicting the outcome of a strategic interaction in the
social sciences. A Nash Equilibrium exists when there is no unilateral
profitable deviation from any of the players involved. On the other
hand, no player in the game would take a different action as long as
every other player remains the same.

• S. Madhavi
• K. Baala Srinivas
• G. Bharath
• R. K. Indhuja
• M. Kowser Chandini

• Game Theory
• Nash Equilibrium
• Rules of Dominance.

[1] Yoram Bachrach, Vasilis Syrgkanis, and Milan Vojnovic (2012)
“Designing Incentives in Online Collaborative Environments” Microsoft
Research Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA
98052.
[2] Y.J. Li, Peter H. F. Ng, H. B. Wang, Y. Li and Simon C. K. Shiu (2010),
“Applying Fuzzy Integral for Performance Evaluation in Real Time
Strategy Game,” Proceedings of 2010 2nd International Conference on
Information and Multimedia Technology, Hong Kong, pp. 168-172.
[3] Glycopantis, D., Muir, A.: Nash Equilibria with Knightian Uncertainty;
the Case of Capacities. Econ Theory 37, 147-159 (2008).
[4] D. Yeung., X. Wang and E. Tsang (2004), “Handling interaction in
fuzzy production rule reasoning,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man,
and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, pp. 1979-1987.
[5] Ehud Lehrer (2004) “Updating Non-Additive Probabilities A Geometric
Approach” Journal of Economic Literature Classification: D81, D83,
D840.
[6] Feryal Erhun, Pınar Keskinocak (2003) “Game Theory in Business
Applications” Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4026.
[7] Ratul Mahajan Maya Rodrig David Wetherall John Zahorjan (2005)
“Experiences Applying Game Theory to System Design” University of
Washington.
[8] Jung-Hsien Chiang “Choquet Fuzzy Integral-Based Hierarchical
Networks for Decision Analysis ” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy systems,
Vol. 7, No. 1, February 1999.
[9] Cyril Mazaud, Jan Rendek, Vincent Bombardier and Laurent Wendling
“A feature selection method based on Choquet Integral and Typicality
Analysis”.
[10] Huy Quan Vu, Gang Li and Gleb Beliakov “A Fuzzy Decision Support
Method for Customer Preferences Analysis based on Choquet integral”
WCCI 2012 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence June,
10-15, 2012.
[11] Muhammad Ayub “Choquet and Sugeno Integrals” February 2009 Alain
Chateauneuf, Rose-Anne Dana, Jean-Marc Tallon” Optimal risk-sharing
rules and equilibria with Choquet-expected-utility” Journal of
Mathematical Economics 34 _2000. 191–214.