Quantum Markov Modeling for Healthcare

A Markov model defines a system of states, composed
by the feasible transition paths between those states, and the
parameters of those transitions. The paths and parameters may be
a representative way to address healthcare issues, such as to identify
the most likely sequence of patient health states given the sequence
of observations. Furthermore estimating the length of stay (LoS) of
patients in hospitalization is one of the challenges that Markov models
allow us to solve. However, finding the maximum probability of
any path that gets to state at time t, can have high computational
cost. A quantum approach allows us to take advantage of quantum
computation since the calculated probabilities can be in several states,
ending up to outperform classical computing due to the possible
superposition of states when handling large amounts of data. The
aid of quantum physics-based architectures and machine learning
techniques are therefore appropriated to address the complexity of
healthcare.




References:
[1] P. Wittek, “Quantum machine learning: what quantum computing means
to data mining,” 2014.
[2] J. B., P. W., N. P., P. R., N. W., and S. l., “Quantum
machine learning,” vol. 549, p. 195, 2017. (Online). Available:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature23474
[3] E. Rieffel and W. Polak, Quantum Computing: A Gentle Introduction,
1st ed. The MIT Press, 2011.
[4] A. Papageorgiou and J. Traub, “Measures of quantum computing
speedup,” vol. 88, no. 02, p. 2316, 2013.
[5] S. Arunachalam and R. de Wolf, “A survey of quantum learning theory,”
2017.
[6] S. Lloyd, M. Mohseni, and P. Rebentrost, “Quantum algorithms
for supervised and unsupervised machine learning,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:1307.0411, 2013.
[7] M. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum
information. Cambridge university press, 2010.
[8] P. LM, M. A, A. M, and et al., “Experimental superposition of orders
of quantum gates,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, p. 7913, 2015.
[9] R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki,
“Quantum entanglement,” American Physical Society, Rev. Mod. Phys.,
vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 865–942, 2009.
[10] H. Jeong, L. Kim, M. S., and Jinhyoung, “Quantum-information
processing for a coherent superposition state via a mixed entangled
coherent channel,” American Physical Society, Phys. Rev. A, vol. 64,
no. 5, p. 052308, 2001.
[11] D. C. McKay, C. J. Wood, S. Sheldon, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta,
“Efficient z-gates for quantum computing,” arXiv:1612.00858, 2016.
[12] A. Jeremic and K. Tan, “Predicting the length of stay for neonates
using heart-rate markov models,” Conference proceedings : ... Annual
International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and
Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
Annual Conference, vol. 2008, pp. 2912–5, 2008.
[13] H. Xie, T. J. Chaussalet, and P. H. Millard, “A continuous time markov
model for the length of stay of elderly people in institutional long-term
care,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, vol. 168, pp.
51–61, 2005.
[14] P. A., C. W., and D. RJ., “Predicting the length of stay of patients
admitted for intensive care using a first step analysis,” Health services
and outcomes research methodology, vol. 6, no. 3–4, pp. 127–138, 2006.
[15] T. V. Le, C. K. Kwoh, E. S. Teo, and K. H. Lee, “Analyzing trends
of hospital length of stay using phase-type distributions,” IEEE 11th
International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, Vancouver, BC,
pp. 1026–1033, 2011.
[16] A. A. Verburg IW, E. S., H. R. A.-H. A, de Jonge E, P. N, and
de Keizer NF, “Which models can i use to predict adult icu length of
stay? a systematic review.” Crit Care Med., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. e222–e231,
2017 Feb.
[17] A. Marshall, C. Vasilakis, and E. El-Darzi, “Length of stay-based patient
flow models: recent developments and future directions,” pp. 213–20,
Aug 2005.
[18] T. Johnson, H. Clark, S. R., and D. Jaksch, “What is a quantum
simulator?” EPJ Quantum Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014.
[19] A. Montanaro, “Quantum algorithms: an overview,” npj Quantum
Information, vol. 2, pp. 15 023+, 2016. (Online). Available:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjqi.2015.23
[20] M. Cholewa, P. Gawron, P. Gomb, and D. Kurzyk, “Quantum hidden
markov models based on transition operation matrices,” Quantum
Information Processing, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 101, 2017.
[21] S. Srinivasan, G. Gordon, and B. Boots, “Learning hidden quantum
markov models,” arXiv:1710.09016, 2017.
[22] G. Forney Jr, “The viterbi algorithm,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 61,
no. 3, pp. 268–278, 1973.
[23] J. S. Rahhal, D. I. Abu-Al-Nadi, and M. Hawa, “Evolutionary
computation in coded communications: an implementation of viterbi
algorithm,” Evolutionary Computation, InTech, 2009.
[24] J. R. Grice and D. Meyer, “A quantum algorithm for viterbi decoding
of classical convolutional codes,” Quantum Information Processing,
vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 2307–2321, 2015.
[25] U. of Southern California, “Viterbi algorithm goes quantum.”
ScienceDaily, 2008.