Modeling Corporate Memories using the ReCaRo Model, Some Experiments
This paper presents a model of case based corporate
memory named ReCaRo (REsource, CAse, ROle). The approach
suggested in ReCaRo decomposes the domain to model through a set
of components. These components represent the objects developed by
the company during its activity. They are reused, and sometimes,
while bringing adaptations. These components are enriched by
knowledge after each reuse. ReCaRo builds the corporate memory on
the basis of these components. It models two types of knowledge: 1)
Business Knowledge, which constitutes the main knowledge capital
of the company, refers to its basic skill, thus, directly to the
components and 2) the Experience Knowledge which is a specialised
knowledge and represents the experience gained during the handling
of business knowledge. ReCaRo builds corporate memories which
are made up of five communicating ones.
[1] Brooking A. Corporate memory: strategies for knowledge management.
London: Thom Business Press; 2000.
[2] Kingston J, Macintosh A. Knowledge Management through multiperspective
modelling: representing and distributing organizational
memory. Knowledge-Based Systems 2000; Vol. 13, N 2-3: 121-131.
[3] Ackerman M.S. Augmenting organizational memory: a field study of
Answer Garden. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 2000; Vol
16, N 3:203-214.
[4] Abecker A, Bernardi A, Hinkelmann K, Kuhn O,Sintek M. Toward a
technology for organizational memories, IEEE Intelligent Systems 1998;
May/June : 40-45.
[5] Buckingham-Shum S. Negotiating the Construction and Reconstruction
of Organisational Memories. Journal of Universal Computer Science
1997; Vol. 3, No. 8: 899-928.
[6] VanHeijst G, VanDerSpek R, Kruisinga E. Organizing corporate
memories. In Proceedings of workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for
Knowledge-Based Systems, Alberta, Canada 1996; 87-96).
[7] Boersma J. Stegwee R. Exploring the issues of Knowledge Management.
In Proc of the Information Resources Management Association
International Conference 1996; 127-135.
[8] Tang-Ho L, Lamontagne L. Structuring Organizational Memories using
Multi- Dimensional Knowledge Networks. In Proceedings of the
EJCAI'2000.
[9] Poitou JP. La gestion collective des connaissances et la mémoire
individuelle. In : J. M. Fouet, Connaissance et savoir faire en entreprise.
Paris: Hermes; 1997.
[10] Pomian, J. Mémoire d'entreprise : techniques et outils pour la
transmission du savoir. Paris: Sapientia; 1996.
[11] Davenport T, Prusac L. Working knowledge, how organizations manage
what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2000.
[12] Ermine JL, Barthelme F, Rosenthal-Sabroux C. Architecture for
knowledge evolution in organizations. European Jnl of Oper. Research
1998; Vol. 109, No. 2: 414-427.
[13] Zdrahal Z. An Intelligent Brokering Service for Knowledge-Component
Reuse on the World-Wide-Web. In Proceedings KAW, 1998.
[14] Nonaka I. Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-creating Company: How
Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation New York:
Hardcover; 2002.
[15] Bushmann F. Meunier R, Ronhert H, Sommerland P, Stal M. Pattern
oriented software architecture: a system of pattern. New York: John
Willey and Sons; 1998.
[16] Dieng R, & Al. Méthodes et outils pour la gestion des connaissances,
une approche pluridisciplinaire du knowledge management. Paris :
Dunod ; 2001.
[17] Eichenbaum C, Tamissier S. Gestion des connaissances sur les réacteurs
avec le système ACCORE. Document numérique 1997 ; Vol. 2, No.1.
[18] Demian P. CoMem: Design knowledge from a corporate memory.
Doctoral Thesis 2004, Stanford University.
[19] Santhanam R, Sharef M. Process for corporate memory retention. Jnl
Knowledge management practice 2002.
[20] Motta E, Buckingham S, Domingue J. Ontology-Driven Document
Enrichment: Principles, Tools and Applications. International Journal of
Human-Computer Studies 2000; Vol. 52, No. 5 : 1071-1109.
[1] Brooking A. Corporate memory: strategies for knowledge management.
London: Thom Business Press; 2000.
[2] Kingston J, Macintosh A. Knowledge Management through multiperspective
modelling: representing and distributing organizational
memory. Knowledge-Based Systems 2000; Vol. 13, N 2-3: 121-131.
[3] Ackerman M.S. Augmenting organizational memory: a field study of
Answer Garden. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 2000; Vol
16, N 3:203-214.
[4] Abecker A, Bernardi A, Hinkelmann K, Kuhn O,Sintek M. Toward a
technology for organizational memories, IEEE Intelligent Systems 1998;
May/June : 40-45.
[5] Buckingham-Shum S. Negotiating the Construction and Reconstruction
of Organisational Memories. Journal of Universal Computer Science
1997; Vol. 3, No. 8: 899-928.
[6] VanHeijst G, VanDerSpek R, Kruisinga E. Organizing corporate
memories. In Proceedings of workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for
Knowledge-Based Systems, Alberta, Canada 1996; 87-96).
[7] Boersma J. Stegwee R. Exploring the issues of Knowledge Management.
In Proc of the Information Resources Management Association
International Conference 1996; 127-135.
[8] Tang-Ho L, Lamontagne L. Structuring Organizational Memories using
Multi- Dimensional Knowledge Networks. In Proceedings of the
EJCAI'2000.
[9] Poitou JP. La gestion collective des connaissances et la mémoire
individuelle. In : J. M. Fouet, Connaissance et savoir faire en entreprise.
Paris: Hermes; 1997.
[10] Pomian, J. Mémoire d'entreprise : techniques et outils pour la
transmission du savoir. Paris: Sapientia; 1996.
[11] Davenport T, Prusac L. Working knowledge, how organizations manage
what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2000.
[12] Ermine JL, Barthelme F, Rosenthal-Sabroux C. Architecture for
knowledge evolution in organizations. European Jnl of Oper. Research
1998; Vol. 109, No. 2: 414-427.
[13] Zdrahal Z. An Intelligent Brokering Service for Knowledge-Component
Reuse on the World-Wide-Web. In Proceedings KAW, 1998.
[14] Nonaka I. Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-creating Company: How
Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation New York:
Hardcover; 2002.
[15] Bushmann F. Meunier R, Ronhert H, Sommerland P, Stal M. Pattern
oriented software architecture: a system of pattern. New York: John
Willey and Sons; 1998.
[16] Dieng R, & Al. Méthodes et outils pour la gestion des connaissances,
une approche pluridisciplinaire du knowledge management. Paris :
Dunod ; 2001.
[17] Eichenbaum C, Tamissier S. Gestion des connaissances sur les réacteurs
avec le système ACCORE. Document numérique 1997 ; Vol. 2, No.1.
[18] Demian P. CoMem: Design knowledge from a corporate memory.
Doctoral Thesis 2004, Stanford University.
[19] Santhanam R, Sharef M. Process for corporate memory retention. Jnl
Knowledge management practice 2002.
[20] Motta E, Buckingham S, Domingue J. Ontology-Driven Document
Enrichment: Principles, Tools and Applications. International Journal of
Human-Computer Studies 2000; Vol. 52, No. 5 : 1071-1109.
@article{"International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences:55465", author = "Lotfi Admane", title = "Modeling Corporate Memories using the ReCaRo Model, Some Experiments", abstract = "This paper presents a model of case based corporate
memory named ReCaRo (REsource, CAse, ROle). The approach
suggested in ReCaRo decomposes the domain to model through a set
of components. These components represent the objects developed by
the company during its activity. They are reused, and sometimes,
while bringing adaptations. These components are enriched by
knowledge after each reuse. ReCaRo builds the corporate memory on
the basis of these components. It models two types of knowledge: 1)
Business Knowledge, which constitutes the main knowledge capital
of the company, refers to its basic skill, thus, directly to the
components and 2) the Experience Knowledge which is a specialised
knowledge and represents the experience gained during the handling
of business knowledge. ReCaRo builds corporate memories which
are made up of five communicating ones.", keywords = "Corporate memories, meta-model, reuse, ReCaRo.", volume = "1", number = "10", pages = "525-6", }
