Identifying Significant Factors of Brick Laying Process through Design of Experiment and Computer Simulation: A Case Study

Improving performance measures in the construction processes has been a major concern for managers and decision makers in the industry. They seek for ways to recognize the key factors which have the largest effect on the process. Identifying such factors can guide them to focus on the right parts of the process in order to gain the best possible result. In the present study design of experiment (DOE) has been applied to a computer simulation model of brick laying process to determine significant factors while productivity has been chosen as the response of the experiment. To this end, four controllable factors and their interaction have been experimented and the best factor level has been calculated for each one. The results indicate that three factors, namely, labor of brick, labor of mortar and inter arrival time of mortar along with interaction of labor of brick and labor of mortar are significant.

Authors:

• M. H. Zarei
• A. Nikakhtar
• A. H. Roudsari
• N. Madadi
• K. Y. Wong

Keywords:

• Brick laying process
• computer simulation
• design of experiment
• significant factors.

References:

[1] S. Wang and D.W. Halpin, Simulation Experiment for Improving
Construction Processes, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation
Conference, 2004.
[2] H. Taghaddos, S. AbouRizk and Y. Mohamed, Simulation-based
Scheduling of Modular Construction using Multi-agent Resource
Allocation, 2010 Second International Conference on Advances in
System Simulation, 2010.
[3] E. Alkoc and F. Erbatur, Productivity Improvement in Concreting
Operations through Simulation Models, Building Research and
Information, Vol.25, No.2, pp. 82-91, 1997.
[4] A. Nikakhtar, A. Abbasian Hosseini and K.Y. Wong, Sensitivity
Analysis of Construction Processes using Computer Simulation: A Case
Study, Advanced Science Letters, Vol.13, pp. 680-684, 2012.
[5] E.V. Gijo and G. Ravindran, Quality in the Construction Industry: An
application of DOE with Goal Programming, Total Quality
Management, Vol.19, No.12, pp. 1249-1255, 2008.
[6] N. Alagumurthi, K. Palaniradja and V. Soundararajan, Optimization of
Grinding Process through Design of Experiment (DOE)-A Comparative
Study, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol.21, No.1, pp. 19-21,
2006.
[7] H.-S. Jacob Tsao and I. Wibowo, A Method for Identifying A Minimal
Set of Test Conditions in 2k Experimental Design, Computers &
Industrial Engineering, Vol.48, No.1, pp. 141-151, 2005.
[8] M. Hassan and S. Gruber, Simulation of Concrete Paving Operations on
Interstate, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,
Vol.134, No.1, pp. 2-9, 2005.
[9] G. Zakaria, Z. Guan, X. Shao, Y. Riaz and U. Hameed, Selection of
Simulation Software for Manufacturing System: Application of
Analytical Hierarchy Approach in Multi Criteria Decision Making,
Advanced Science Letters, Vol.4, No.6-7, pp. 2152-2158, 2011.
[10] A. Al-Sudairi, Evaluating the effect of construction process
characteristics to the applicability of lean principles, Construction
Innovation, Vol.7, No.1, pp. 99-121, 2007.
[11] M. M. Hassan, and S. Gruber., Simulation of Concrete Paving
Operations on Interstate-74, Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management, Vol.134, No.1, pp. 2-9, 2008.
[12] A. M. Law, and W. D. Kelton, Simulation modeling and analysis, 3rd
Ed., McGraw-Hill, 2000.
[13] D.C. Montgomery, Statistical Quality Control, A Modern Introduction,
John Wily and Sons, 2009, ch. 13.