Forecasting Unemployment Rate in Selected European Countries Using Smoothing Methods

The aim of this paper is to select the most accurate
forecasting method for predicting the future values of the
unemployment rate in selected European countries. In order to do so,
several forecasting techniques adequate for forecasting time series
with trend component, were selected, namely: double exponential
smoothing (also known as Holt`s method) and Holt-Winters` method
which accounts for trend and seasonality. The results of the empirical
analysis showed that the optimal model for forecasting
unemployment rate in Greece was Holt-Winters` additive method. In
the case of Spain, according to MAPE, the optimal model was double
exponential smoothing model. Furthermore, for Croatia and Italy the
best forecasting model for unemployment rate was Holt-Winters`
multiplicative model, whereas in the case of Portugal the best model
to forecast unemployment rate was Double exponential smoothing
model. Our findings are in line with European Commission
unemployment rate estimates.





References:
[1] B. L. Bowerman, and R. T. O'Connell, Forecasting and Time Series. 3rd
ed., Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press, 1993.
[2] C. C. Holt, Forecasting seasonal and trends by exponentially weighted
moving averages. Office of Naval Research, Research Memorandum no.
52, 1957.
[3] D. C. Montgomery, C. L. Jennings, and M. Kulahci, Introduction to
Time Series Analysis and Forecasting. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons,
2008.
[4] D. Gounopoulos, D. Petmezas, and D. Santamaria, “Forecasting Tourist
Arrivals in Greece and the Impact of Macroeconomic Shocks from the
Countries of Tourists’ Origin,” Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 39, no.
2, pp. 641–666, 2012.
[5] E. Önder, F. Bayır, and A. Hepsen, “Forecasting Macroeconomic
Variables Using Artificial Neural Network and Traditional Smoothing
Techniques,” Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, vol. 3, no. 4, pp.
73–104, 2013.
[6] European Commision, (2014), European Economic Forecast: Spring
2014, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/
european_economy/2014/pdf/ee3_en.pdf (15 October 2014).
[7] J. Dovern, and J. Weisser, “Accuracy, unbiasedness and efficiency of
professional macroeconomic forecasts: An empirical comparison for the
G7,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 452–465,
2011.
[8] M. Simionescu, “The Performance of Unemployment Rate Predictions
in Romania: Strategies to Improve the Forecasts Accuracy,” Review of
Economics Perspectives, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 161–175, 2013.
[9] S. M. Bratu, “Forecasts for Inflation and Unemployment Rate Based on
Models Using Resample Techniques,” International Journal of
Economic Practices and Theories, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 103–107, 2013.
[10] S. M. Bratu, “Predicting Macroeconomic Indicators in the Czech
Republic Using Econometric Models and Exponential Smoothing
Techniques,” South East European Journal of Economics and Business,
vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 89–99, 2012a.
[11] S. M. Bratu, “The Accuracy and Bias Evaluation of the Unemployment
Rate Forecasts: Methods to Improve the Forecasts Accuracy,” Annals of
the University of Petrosani – Economics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 17–32,
2012b.
[12] S. Makridakis, S. C. Wheelwright, and R. J. Hyndman, Forecasting,
Methods and Applications. 3rd ed., New York: Wiley, 1998.
[13] V. Voineagu, S. Pisica, and N. Caragea, “Forecasting Monthly
Unemployment by Econometric Smoothing Techniques,” Journal of Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and
Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 255–267, 2012.
[14] W. L. Winston, S. C. Albright, and M. Broadie, Practical Management
Science. 2nd ed., Duxbury, Pacific Grove: Thomson Learning 2001.