Effect of Infill Walls on Response of Multi Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure

The present research work investigates the seismic response of reinforced concrete (RC) frame building considering the effect of modeling masonry infill (MI) walls. The seismic behavior of a residential 6-storey RC frame building, considering and ignoring the effect of masonry, is numerically investigated using response spectrum (RS) analysis. The considered herein building is designed as a moment resisting frame (MRF) system following the Egyptian code (EC) requirements. Two developed models in terms of bare frame and infill walls frame are used in the study. Equivalent diagonal strut methodology is used to represent the behavior of infill walls, whilst the well-known software package ETABS is used for implementing all frame models and performing the analysis. The results of the numerical simulations such as base shear, displacements, and internal forces for the bare frame as well as the infill wall frame are presented in a comparative way. The results of the study indicate that the interaction between infill walls and frames significantly change the responses of buildings during earthquakes compared to the results of bare frame building model. Specifically, the seismic analysis of RC bare frame structure leads to underestimation of base shear and consequently damage or even collapse of buildings may occur under strong shakings. On the other hand, considering infill walls significantly decrease the peak floor displacements and drifts in both X and Y-directions.

Authors:

• Ayman Abd-Elhamed
• Sayed Mahmoud

Keywords:

• Masonry infill
• bare frame
• response spectrum
• seismic response.

References:

[1] Flanagan, R.D., Bennett, R.M.: “In-plane Behavior of Structural Clay
Tile Infilled Frames” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 125, No.
6, pp. 590-599, 1999.
[2] Hao, H., Ma, G., Lu, Y.: “Damage Assessment of Masonry Infilled RC
Frames Subjected to Blasting Induced Ground Excitations” Journal of
Engineering Structures, Vol. 24, pp. 799-809, 2002.
[3] Kodur, V.K.R., M.A. Erki, and J.H.P. Quenneville, Seismic design and
analysis of masonry-infilled frames. Canadian Journal of Civil
Engineering, 1995. 22(3): p. 576-587.
[4] Humar, J.M., D. Lau, and J.-R. Pierre, Performance of buildings during
the 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2001.
28(6): p. 979-991.
[5] Saatcioglu, M., et al., The August 17, 1999, Kocaeli (Turkey)
earthquake — damage to structures. Canadian Journal of Civil
Engineering, 2001. 28(4): p. 715-737.
[6] Korkmaz, K.A., F. Demir, and M. Sivri, Earthquake Assessment of R /
C Structures with Masonry Infill Walls. International Journal of Science
and Technology, 2007. 2: p. 155-164.
[7] Taher, S.E.-D.F. and H.M.E.-D. Afefy, Role of masonry infill in seismic
resistance of RC structures. The Arabian Journal for Science and
Engineering, 2008. 33: p. 291-306.
[8] FEMA - 306: “Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and
Masonry Wall Buildings - Basic Procedures Manual” Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 1999.
[9] Mainstone, R. J.: ‘‘Supplementary Note on the Stiffness and Strength of
Infilled Frames.’’ Building Research Station, Garston, Watford, 1974.
[10] Smith, B.S.: ‘‘Lateral Stiffness of Infilled Frames’’ Journal of Structural
Division, Vol. 88, No. 6, pp. 183-199, 1962.