Development and Structural Performance Evaluation on Slit Circular Shear Panel Damper
There are several types of metal-based devices conceived as dampers for the seismic energy absorber whereby damages to the major structural components could be minimized for both new and existing structures. This paper aimed to develop and evaluate structural performance of slit circular shear panel damper for passive seismic energy protection by inelastic deformation. Structural evaluation was done using commercially available nonlinear FE simulation program. The main parameters considered are: diameter-to-thickness (D/t) ratio and slit length-to-width ratio (l/w). Depending on these parameters three different buckling mode and hysteretic behavior was found: yielding prior to buckling without strength degradation, yielding prior to buckling with strength degradation and yielding with buckling and strength degradation which forms pinching at initial displacement. The susceptible location at which the possible crack is initiated is also identified for selected specimens using rupture index.
[1] Kelly J. M., Skinner, R. I., and Heine, A. J. 1972 "Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures,” Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 5, 63–88.
[2] Skinner R. I., Kelly J. M., and Heine A. J., 1975 "Hysteresis dampers for earthquake-resistant structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 3, 287–296.
[3] Soong TT, Dargush GF. Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering. John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
[4] Soong TT, Spencer Jr BF. Supplemental energy dissipation: State-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Eng Struct 2002;24:243–59.
[5] Whittaker AS, Bertero VV, Thompson CL, Alonso LJ. Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices. Earthq Spectra 1991;7(4):563–604
[6] Bergman DM, Goel SC. Evaluation of cyclic testing of steel plate devices for added damping and stiffness. Report no. UMCE87-10. Ann Arbor (MI, USA): The University of Michigan; 1987.
[7] Tsai K, Chen H, Hong C, Su Y. Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seimic-resistant construction. Earthquake Spectra 1993;9(3):505–28.
[8] Daniel Y. Abebe, Jae Hyouk Choi, Analytical Study on Hysteretic Characteristics of Circular Shear Panel Damper. Proceeding of International Conference on Advances in Civil, Structural and Mechanical Engineering - CSM, 01-02 June, 2014, London, UK.
[9] Daniel Y. Abebe, Jae Hyouk Choi, Analytical Study on Hysteretic Characteristics of Circular Shear Panel Damper. Accepted waiting publication on International Conference on Civil, Structural and Earthquake Engineering, - June 16-17,2014 Toronto, Canada.
[10] Ricky W.K. Chana, Faris Albermani, Martin S. Williams, 209. Evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 65, 260–268
[11] Ian D. Aiken, Douglas K. Nims, Andrew S. Whittaker, and James M. Kelly. Testing of Passive Energy Dissipation Systems. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 9, no. 3, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute California, August (1993).
[12] Wen YK. Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems. J Engr Mech 1976;102:249–63.
[13] Shervin Malekia, Saman Bagheri 2010. Pipe damper, Part II: Application to bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 66, 1096-1106
[14] S. B. Beheshti-Aval, H. Mahbanouei and F. Zareian 2013. A Hybrid Friction-yielding Damper to Equip Concentrically Braced Steel Frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, Vol 13, No 4, 577-587.
[15] C. S. Oh, N. H. Kim, Y. J. Kim, J. H. Baek, Y. P. Kim, W. S. Kim, 2011, ‘A finite element ductile failure simulation method using stress-modified fracture strain model’ Engineering Fracture Mechanics 78 (2011) 124–137
[16] Chi WM, Kanvinde AM, Deierlein GG. Prediction of ductile fracture in steel connections using SMCS criterion. J Struct Eng 2006;132(2):171–81.
[17] Kanvinde AM, Deierlein G. Micromechanical simulation of earthquake induced fracture in steel structures. Tech. Rep. TR145, Blume Center, Stanford Univ; 2004.
[18] Amira A. Hedayat, Murude Celikag. Enhancement of Panel zone (PZ) contribution to the ductility of post-Northridge welded connections. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics 5(3) 165-174.
[1] Kelly J. M., Skinner, R. I., and Heine, A. J. 1972 "Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures,” Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 5, 63–88.
[2] Skinner R. I., Kelly J. M., and Heine A. J., 1975 "Hysteresis dampers for earthquake-resistant structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 3, 287–296.
[3] Soong TT, Dargush GF. Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering. John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
[4] Soong TT, Spencer Jr BF. Supplemental energy dissipation: State-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Eng Struct 2002;24:243–59.
[5] Whittaker AS, Bertero VV, Thompson CL, Alonso LJ. Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices. Earthq Spectra 1991;7(4):563–604
[6] Bergman DM, Goel SC. Evaluation of cyclic testing of steel plate devices for added damping and stiffness. Report no. UMCE87-10. Ann Arbor (MI, USA): The University of Michigan; 1987.
[7] Tsai K, Chen H, Hong C, Su Y. Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seimic-resistant construction. Earthquake Spectra 1993;9(3):505–28.
[8] Daniel Y. Abebe, Jae Hyouk Choi, Analytical Study on Hysteretic Characteristics of Circular Shear Panel Damper. Proceeding of International Conference on Advances in Civil, Structural and Mechanical Engineering - CSM, 01-02 June, 2014, London, UK.
[9] Daniel Y. Abebe, Jae Hyouk Choi, Analytical Study on Hysteretic Characteristics of Circular Shear Panel Damper. Accepted waiting publication on International Conference on Civil, Structural and Earthquake Engineering, - June 16-17,2014 Toronto, Canada.
[10] Ricky W.K. Chana, Faris Albermani, Martin S. Williams, 209. Evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 65, 260–268
[11] Ian D. Aiken, Douglas K. Nims, Andrew S. Whittaker, and James M. Kelly. Testing of Passive Energy Dissipation Systems. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 9, no. 3, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute California, August (1993).
[12] Wen YK. Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems. J Engr Mech 1976;102:249–63.
[13] Shervin Malekia, Saman Bagheri 2010. Pipe damper, Part II: Application to bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 66, 1096-1106
[14] S. B. Beheshti-Aval, H. Mahbanouei and F. Zareian 2013. A Hybrid Friction-yielding Damper to Equip Concentrically Braced Steel Frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, Vol 13, No 4, 577-587.
[15] C. S. Oh, N. H. Kim, Y. J. Kim, J. H. Baek, Y. P. Kim, W. S. Kim, 2011, ‘A finite element ductile failure simulation method using stress-modified fracture strain model’ Engineering Fracture Mechanics 78 (2011) 124–137
[16] Chi WM, Kanvinde AM, Deierlein GG. Prediction of ductile fracture in steel connections using SMCS criterion. J Struct Eng 2006;132(2):171–81.
[17] Kanvinde AM, Deierlein G. Micromechanical simulation of earthquake induced fracture in steel structures. Tech. Rep. TR145, Blume Center, Stanford Univ; 2004.
[18] Amira A. Hedayat, Murude Celikag. Enhancement of Panel zone (PZ) contribution to the ductility of post-Northridge welded connections. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics 5(3) 165-174.
@article{"International Journal of Architectural, Civil and Construction Sciences:67762", author = "Daniel Y. Abebe and Jaehyouk Choi", title = "Development and Structural Performance Evaluation on Slit Circular Shear Panel Damper", abstract = "There are several types of metal-based devices conceived as dampers for the seismic energy absorber whereby damages to the major structural components could be minimized for both new and existing structures. This paper aimed to develop and evaluate structural performance of slit circular shear panel damper for passive seismic energy protection by inelastic deformation. Structural evaluation was done using commercially available nonlinear FE simulation program. The main parameters considered are: diameter-to-thickness (D/t) ratio and slit length-to-width ratio (l/w). Depending on these parameters three different buckling mode and hysteretic behavior was found: yielding prior to buckling without strength degradation, yielding prior to buckling with strength degradation and yielding with buckling and strength degradation which forms pinching at initial displacement. The susceptible location at which the possible crack is initiated is also identified for selected specimens using rupture index.
", keywords = "Slit circular shear panel damper, Hysteresis Characteristics, Slip length-to-width ratio, D/t ratio, FE analysis.", volume = "8", number = "7", pages = "808-6", }
