CDM Controller Order and Disturbance Rejection Ability

The coefficient diagram method is primarily an algebraic control design method whose objective is to easily obtain
a good controller with minimum user effort. As a matter of fact, if a
system model, in the form of linear differential equations, is known,
the user only need to define a time-constant and the controller order.
The later can be established regarding the expected disturbance type
via a lookup table first published by Koksal and Hamamci in 2004.
However an inaccuracy in this table was detected and pointed-out in
the present work. Moreover the above mentioned table was expanded
in order to enclose any k order type disturbance.





References:
[1] T. Benjanarasuth J. Ngamwiwit A. Cahyadi, D. Isarakorn and
N. Komine. Application of coefficient diagram method for rotational
inverted pendulum control. In Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision
Conference, volume 3, pages 1769–1773, 2004.
[2] A. Willsky A. Oppenheim and S. Nawab. Signals and Systems. Prentice
Hall, 1997.
[3] A. Budiyono and T. Sudiyanto. An algebraic approach for the mimo
control of small scale helicopter. In Proceedings of ICIUS07, pages
64–72, 2007.
[4] Z. Ding. Adaptive estimation and rejection of unknown sinusoidal
disturbances in a class of non-minimum-phase nonlinear systems. IEE
Proceedings Control Theory Applications, 153(4):379–386, September
2006.
[5] M. Hou. Amplitude and frequency estimator of a sinusoid. IEEE
Transactions on Autom, 50(6):855–858, June 2005.
[6] C. Kessler. Ein beitrag zur theorie mehrschleifiger regulungen.
Regelungst, 8:261–266, 1960.
[7] M. Koksal and S. E. Hamamci. A program for the design of linear
time invariant control systems: Cdmcad. Computer Applications in
Engineering Education, 12-3:165–174, 2004.
[8] R. Ortega L. Hsu and G. Damm. A globally convergent frequency
estimator. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 44(4):698–713,
April 1999.
[9] A. V. Lipatov and N. Sokolov. Some sufficient conditions for stability
and instability of continous linear stationary systems. Automat Remote
Contr, 39:1285–1291, 1979.
[10] S. Manabe. Coefficient diagram method as applied to the attitude control
of controlled-bias-momentum satellite. In 13th IFAC Symposium on
Automatic Control in Aerospace, pages 322–327, September 1994.
[11] S. Manabe. The coefficent diagram method. In 14th IFAC Symposium
on Automatic Control in Aerospace, pages 199–210, August 1998.
[12] S. Manabe. Coefficient diagram method in mimo application: An
aerospace case study. In Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress,
pages 1961–1966, 2005.
[13] S. Manabe and Y. Kim. Coefficient diagram method for control system
design.
[14] M. S. Tavazoei and M. Haeri. Comparision of the existing methods
in determination of the characteristic polynomial. World Academy of
Science, Engineering and Technology, 6:720–723, 2007.
[15] P. Roengruen T. Suksri V. Kongratana, A. Numsomran and
S. Thuengsripan. Smith predictor design by cdm for temperature control
system. In Proceeedings ICCAS07, pages 1472–1477, 2007.
[16] A. Bir . cal and B. Tibken. Digital design of coefficent diagram method.
In 2009 American control conference, pages 2849–2854, 2009.