Automatically-generated Concept Maps as a Learning Tool

Concept maps can be generated manually or automatically. It is important to recognize differences of the two types of concept maps. The automatically generated concept maps are dynamic, interactive, and full of associations between the terms on the maps and the underlying documents. Through a specific concept mapping system, Visual Concept Explorer (VCE), this paper discusses how automatically generated concept maps are different from manually generated concept maps and how different applications and learning opportunities might be created with the automatically generated concept maps. The paper presents several examples of learning strategies that take advantages of the automatically generated concept maps for concept learning and exploration.

Authors:

• Xia Lin

Keywords:

• Concept maps
• Dynamic concept representation
• learning strategies
• visual interface
• Visual Concept Explorer.

References:

[1] Novak, J. D. & Ca├▒as, A. J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept
Maps and How to Construct and Use Them, Technical Report IHMC
CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and
Machine Cognition. Available at:
http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingCon
ceptMaps.pdf
[2] Anderson, J. R., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y.
(2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4),
1036-1050.
[3] Novak, J.D. (1998) Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept
Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations, Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
[4] Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept
map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91-101.
[5] Lancaster, F. W. (1986). Vocabulary Control for Information Retrieval
(2nd ed.). Arlington, VA: Information Resources Press.
[6] UMLS (2007). Unified Medical Language System.
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/
[7] Chen, H. Schatz, B., Yim, T., & Fye, D. (1995). Automatic Thesaurus
Generation for an Electronic Community System. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science, 46( 3), 175-193.
[8] Schatz, B.R. (1997). Information Retrieval in Digital Libraries: Bringing
Search to the Net. Science, 275(5298), 327-334.
[9] Kohonen, T. (1997). Self-Organizing Maps. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
[10] Honkela, T.; Kaski, S.; Lagus, K., Kohonen, T. (1998). Self-organizing
maps of very large document collections: Justification for the WEBSOM
method. In Balderjahn, I., Mathar, R., and Schader, M., editors,
Classification, Data Analysis, and Data Highways, pages 245-252.
Springer, Berlin.
[11] Schvaneveldt, R. W. (Ed.). (1990). Pathfinder associative networks:
Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
[12] Gardenfors, P. (2004). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought.
MIT Press.
[13] Takayama, Y.; Flournoy, R.; Kaufmann, S. (1998). Information
mapping: Concept-based information retrieval based on word
associations. Unpublished technical report. Stanford University.
[14] Widdows, D. (2004). Geometry and meaning. CSLI Publications,
Stanford University.
[15] Lin, X.; Aluker, S.; Zhu, W.; & Zhang, F. (2006). "Dynamic Concept
Representation through a Visual Concept Explorer." Advances in
Knowledge Organization, Vol. 10; Proceedings of the Ninth Conference
of the International Society of Knowledge Organization (ISKO 2006,
July 4 - 7, Vienna, Austria), pp. 367-374.
[16] Buzydlowski, J. (2002). A Comparison of Self-Organizing Maps to
Pathfinder Networks for the Mapping of Author Co-Citation Analysis.
(Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, October, 2002, Drexel University).
[17] Williams, J. (2007). The Impact of Concept Map Visualizations on the
Information Behavior, Perceptions of Performance, Learning and Use of
Novices in the Information Retrieval Context. (Unpublished Ph.D.
dissertation, May, 2007, Drexel University).