Analysis of a TBM Tunneling Effect on Surface Subsidence: A Case Study from Tehran, Iran

The development and extension of large cities induced a need for shallow tunnel in soft ground of building areas. Estimation of ground settlement caused by the tunnel excavation is important engineering point. In this paper, prediction of surface subsidence caused by tunneling in one section of seventh line of Tehran subway is considered. On the basis of studied geotechnical conditions of the region, tunnel with the length of 26.9km has been excavated applying a mechanized method using an EPB-TBM with a diameter of 9.14m. In this regard, settlement is estimated utilizing both analytical and numerical finite element method. The numerical method shows that the value of settlement in this section is 5cm. Besides, the analytical consequences (Bobet and Loganathan-Polous) are 5.29 and 12.36cm, respectively. According to results of this study, due tosaturation of this section, there are good agreement between Bobet and numerical methods. Therefore, tunneling processes in this section needs a special consolidation measurement and support system before the passage of tunnel boring machine.

Authors:

• A. R. Salimi
• M. Esmaeili
• B. Salehi

Keywords:

• TBM
• Subsidence
• Numerical Method
• Analytical Method.

References:

[1] R.B. Peck, "Deep excavation and tunneling in soft ground. State-of-theart
report," Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico,1969, pp. 225-290
[2] J.H. Atkinson, and D. M. Potts, "Subsidence above shallow tunnels in
soft ground." Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE 103, 1977, pp. 307-325.
[3] C. Oteo and J.F.Moya, Estimation of the soil parameters of Madrid in
relation to the tunnel construction. Proc 7th Euro conf. on soil mechanics
and foundation engineering 3, Brighton,1979, pp. 239-247.
[4] W.J. Rankin, Ground movements resulting from urban tunneling:
Predictions and effects. Engineering Geology of Underground
Movements. 5, 1988, pp. 79-92.
[5] B.M. New andM.P.O-ReilIy, Tunneling induced ground movements;
Predicting their magnitude and effects. Proceedings of the 4th
International Conference on Ground Movements and Structures, invited
review paper, Cardiff, Pentech Press, London,1991, pp. 671-697.
[6] R.J. Mair.,R.N. Taylor, and J.B. Burland, Prediction of ground
movements and assessment of risk of building damage due to bored
tunneling. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geotechnical
Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Balkema,
Rotterdam, Netherlands,1996, pp. 712-718.
[7] R.J. Mair andR.N. Taylor, Bored tunneling in the urban environment.
Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering (ICSMFE), Hamburg, Germany, September 6-
12,1997, pp. 2353-2385.
[8] C. Sagaseta, Analysis of undrained soil deformation due to ground loss.
Geotechnique 37 (3),1987, pp. 301-320.
[9] A. Verruijt andJ.R Booker, Surface settlements due to deformation of a
tunnel in an elastic half plane.Géotechnique 46(4),1996, pp. 753-756.
[10] N. Loganathan andH.G.Poulos, Analytical prediction for tunnelinginduced
ground movements in clays. J. Geotech.
Geoenviron.Eng.ASCE;124(9),1998, pp. 846-856.
[11] K.H. Park, Analytical solution for tunneling-induced ground movements
in clays.Tunnel.Underground Space Technol 20,2005, pp. 249-261.
[12] A. Bobet, Analytical solutions for shallow tunnels in saturated ground. J.
Eng. Mech. ASCE 127(12), 2001, pp. 1258-1266.
[13] H.H. Einstein andC.W. Schwartz, Simplified analysis for tunnel
supports. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE 105 (4),1979, pp. 499-518.
[14] D.M. Potts andT.I.Addenbrooke, A structure-s influence on tunnelinginduced
ground movements. ICE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
125,1997, pp. 109-125.
[15] R.J. Jardine., D.M. Potts., A.B.FourieandJ.B.Burland, Studies Of the
influence non-linear stress-strain characteristics in soil-structure
interaction. Geotechnique 36 (3),1986, pp. 377-396.
[16] C.E. Augarde., Numerical modeling of tunneling processes for
assessment of damage to buildings. PhD, 1997, University of Oxford,
Keble College, Michaelmas Term.
[17] G. Lui, Numerical modeling of settlement damage to masonry buildings
caused by tunneling. PhD,1997, University of Oxford, Brasenose
College, Trinity Term.
[18] M. Melis., L. Medina and J.M. Rodriguez, Prediction and analysis of
subsidence induced by shield tunneling in the Madrid Metro
extension.Can. Geotech. J, 39,2002, pp.1273-1287.
[19] R.B. Downing.Modelling the Heathrow Express Trial Tunnel using the
Finite Element Method. MSc Thesis.1994, Imperial College, University
of London.
[20] G.V. Atzl andJ.K.Mayr., FEM-analysis of Heathrow NATM trial tunnel.
Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering. Balkema,
Rotterdam,1994, pp. 195-201.
[21] A.R. Selby, Surface movements caused by tunneling in two-layer soil.
Engineering Geology of Underground Movements 5,1988, pp. 71-77.
[22] P.B. Attewell andJ.P. Woodman., Predicting the dynamics of ground
settlements and its derivatives by tunneling in soil. Ground Eng
15(8),1982, pp. 13-22.
[23] A. ZawZaw., K.Dhiraj andS. Christian, Ground movement prediction
and building damage risk-assessment for the deep excavations and
tunneling works in Bangkok subsoil. Proceedings of the International
Symposium on Underground Excavation and Tunneling, Bangkok,
Thailand,2006, pp. 281-297.
[24] G.W. Clough andB. Schmidt, Design and performance of excavation and
tunnels in soft clay. Soft clay engineering. Amsterdam, Elsevier,1981,
pp. 569-634.
[25] R.K. Rowe andG.J.Kack, A theoretical examination of the settlements
induced by tunneling: four case histories. Can. Geotech. J 20,1982, pp.
299-314.
[26] K. Lee., R.K. Rowe andK.J. Lo, Subsidence owing to tunneling. I:
Estimating the gap parameter. Can. Geotech. J 29,1992, pp. 929-940.