An Investigation on the Sandwich Panels with Flexible and Toughened Adhesives under Flexural Loading

The material selection in the design of the sandwich
structures is very crucial aspect because of the positive or negative
influences of the base materials to the mechanical properties of the
entire panel. In the literature, it was presented that the selection of the
skin and core materials plays very important role on the behavior of
the sandwich. Beside this, the use of the correct adhesive can make
the whole structure to show better mechanical results and behavior.
In the present work, the static three-point bending tests were
performed on the sandwiches having an aluminum alloy foam core,
the skins made of three different types of fabrics and two different
commercial adhesives (flexible polyurethane and toughened epoxy
based) at different values of support span distances by aiming the
analyses of their flexural performance in terms of absorbed energy,
peak force values and collapse mechanisms. The main results of the
flexural loading are: force-displacement curves obtained after the
bending tests, peak force and absorbed energy values, collapse
mechanisms and adhesion quality. The experimental results presented
that the sandwiches with epoxy based toughened adhesive and the
skins made of S-Glass Woven fabrics indicated the best adhesion
quality and mechanical properties. The sandwiches with toughened
adhesive exhibited higher peak force and energy absorption values
compared to the sandwiches with flexible adhesive. The use of these
sandwich structures can lead to a weight reduction of the transport
vehicles, providing an adequate structural strength under operating
conditions.

• Emre Kara
• Şura Karakuzu
• Ahmet F. Geylan
• Metehan Demir
• Kadir Koç
• Halil Aykul

• Adhesive and adhesion
• Aluminum foam
• Bending
• Collapse mechanisms.

[1] W. J. Cantwell, G. R. Villanueva, “The high velocity impact response of
composite and FML-reinforced sandwich structures”, Composite
Science and Technology, vol. 64, pp. 35-54, 2004.
[2] J. Banhart, “Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular
metals and metal foams”, Progress in Material Science, vol. 46, no. 6,
pp. 559–632, 2001.
[3] H. P. Degischer, B. Kriszt, Handbook of cellular metals: production,
processing, applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag, 2002, ch. 4.
[4] V. Crupi, G. Epasto, E. Guglielmino, “Comparison of aluminium
sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: honeycomb vs. foam”,
Marine Structures, vol. 30, pp. 74 – 96, 2013.
[5] E. Kara, V. Crupi, G. Epasto, E. Guglielmino, H. Aykul, “Low velocity
impact response of glass fiber reinforced aluminium foam sandwich”, in
Proc. of 15th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM15),
Venice, 2012, pp. 1-8.
[6] G. Reyes, “Mechanical behavior of thermoplastic FML-reinforced
sandwich panels using an aluminum foam core: experiments and
modelling”, Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, vol. 12, pp.
81 – 96, 2010.
[7] J. Banhart, C. Schmoll, U. Neumann, “Light-weight aluminium foam
structures for ships”, in Proc. Conf. Materials in Oceanic Environment
(Euromat ’98), Lisbon, 1998, vol. 1, pp. 55–63.
[8] L. J. Gibson, M. F. Ashby, Cellular solids: structure and properties.
Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1997.
[9] M. F. Ashby, A. G. Evans, N. A. Fleck, L. J. Gibson, J. W. Hutchinson,
H. N. G. Wadley, Metal foams: a design guide. Boston: Butterworth-
Heinemann, 2000.
[10] T. M. McCormack, R. Miller, O. Kesler, L. J. Gibson, “Failure of
sandwich beams with metallic foam cores”, International Journal of
Solids and Structures, vol. 38, pp. 4901–4920, 2001.
[11] H. Bart-Smith, J. Hutchinson, A. Evans, “Measurement and analysis of
the structural performance of cellular metal sandwich construction”,
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1945–
1963, 2001.
[12] J. Yu, E. Wang, J. Li, Z. Zheng, “Static and low-velocity impact
behaviour of sandwich beams with closed-cell aluminum foam core in
three-point bending”, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol.
35 , no. 8, pp. 885–894, 2008.
[13] K. Mohan, Y. T. Hon, S. Idapalapati, H. P. Seow, “Failure of sandwich
beams consisting of alumina face and aluminum foam core in bending”,
Materials Science and Engineering:A, vol. 409, pp. 292–301, 2005.
[14] C. Chen, A. M. Harte, N. A. Fleck, “The plastic collapse of sandwich
beams with a metallic foam core”, International Journal of Mechanical
Sciences, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1483–1506, 2001.
[15] Y. Shenhar, Y. Frostig, E. Altus, “Stresses and failure patters in the
bending of sandwich beams with transversely flexible cores and
laminated composite skins”, Composite Structures, vol. 35, pp. 143–152,
1996.
[16] M. Kampner, J. L. Grenestedt, “On using corrugated skins to carry shear
in sandwich beams”, Composite Structures, vol. 85, pp. 139–148, 2007.
[17] V. L. Tagarielli, N. A. Fleck, V. S. Deshpand, “The collapse response of
sandwich beams with aluminium face sheets and a metal foam core in
three-point bending”, in Proceedings of cellular metals and metal
foaming technology (MetFoam2003), Berlin, 2003, pp. 381–386.
[18] H. Bart-Smith, J. W. Hutchinson, N. A. Fleck, A. G. Evans, “Influence
of imperfections on the performance of metal foam core sandwich
panels”, International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 39, pp.
4999–5012, 2002.
[19] O. Kesler, L. J. Gibson, “Size effects in metallic foam core sandwich
beams”, Materials Science and Engineering:A, vol. 326, no. 2, pp. 228–
234, 2002.
[20] C. A. Steeves, N. A. Fleck, “Collapse mechanism of sandwich beams
with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending.
Part I: analytical models and minimum weight design”, International
Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 561–583, 2004.
[21] V. Crupi, R. Montanini, “Aluminium foam sandwiches collapse modes
under static and dynamic three-point bending”, International Journal of
Impact Engineering, vol. 34, pp. 509 – 521, 2007.
[22] J. Baumeister, J. Banhart, M. Weber, “Aluminium foams for transport
industry”, Materials & Design, vol. 18, pp. 217-220, 1997.