An EWMA p Chart Based On Improved Square Root Transformation

Generally, the traditional Shewhart p chart has been developed by for charting the binomial data. This chart has been developed using the normal approximation with condition as low defect level and the small to moderate sample size. In real applications, however, are away from these assumptions due to skewness in the exact distribution. In this paper, a modified Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) control chat for detecting a change in binomial data by improving square root transformations, namely ISRT p EWMA control chart. The numerical results show that ISRT p EWMA chart is superior to ISRT p chart for small to moderate shifts, otherwise, the latter is better for large shifts.


Authors:



References:
[1] M. Schader, and F. Schmid, Two rules of thumb for the approximation
of the binomial distribution by the normal distribution, The American
Statistician, vol. 43, pp. 23–24 (1989).
[2] T.P. Ryan, and N. C. Schwertman, Optimal limits for attributes control
charts, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 29, pp.86–98 (1997).
[3] C.P. Quesenberry, SPC Q charts for start-up process and short or long
runs, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 23, pp.213–224 (1991a).
[4] C.P. Quesenberry, SPC Q charts for a binomial parameter: Short or long
runs, Journal of Quality Technology 23, pp.239–246 (1991b).
[5] C.P. Quesenberry, SPC Q charts for a Poisson parameter λ: short or
long runs, Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 23, pp.296-303 (1991c).
[6] A. Winterbottom, Simple adjustments to improve control limits on
attribute charts, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol.
9, pp.105-109, (1993).
[7] G. Chen, "An improved p chart through simple adjustments,” Journal of
Quality Technology, vol. 30, pp. 142–151 (1998).
[8] T-R. Tsai, C.C. Lin and S-J, Wu, "Alternative attribute control charts
based on improved square root transformation”, Tamsui Oxford Journal
of Mathematics Sciences, vol. 22, pp. 61–72 (2002).
[9] S.W. Roberts, "Control chart tests based on geometric moving average.”
Technometrics, vol. 1, pp. 239–250 (1959).