A Multilevel Comparative Assessment Approach to International Services Trade Competitiveness: The Case of Romania and Bulgaria

International competitiveness receives much attention nowadays, but up to now its assessment has been heavily based on manufacturing industry statistics. This paper addresses the need for competitiveness indicators that cover the service sector and sets out a multilevel framework for measuring international services trade competitiveness. The approach undertaken here aims at comparatively examining the international competitiveness of the EU-25 (the twenty-five European Union member states before the 1st of January 2007), Romanian and Bulgarian services trade, as well as the last two countries- structure of specialization on the EU-25 services market. The primary changes in the international competitiveness of three major services sectors – transportation, travel and other services - are analyzed. This research attempts to determine the ability of the two recent European Union (EU) member states to contend with the challenges that might arise from the hard competition within the enlarged EU, in the field of services trade.

Authors:

• Ana Bobirca
• Paul-Gabriel Miclaus

Keywords:

• Bulgaria
• EU-25
• international competitiveness
• international services trade
• Romania.

References:

[1] EUROSTAT, "Statistics on trade in services", 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005,
2006, 2007.
[2] P. Mandelson, "External aspects of competitiveness", European Services
Forum, Brussels, 2006.
[3] D. Coldwell, "The Question of International Competitiveness",
International Advances in Economic Research, volume 6, No 3,
February 2000.
[4] D. Dollar, E. N. Wolff, "Competitiveness, Convergence, and
International Specialization", Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT
Press, 1993.
[5] J. Fagerberg, "Technology, Growth and International Competitiveness",
Norsk Utenrikpolitisk Institut, VUPI rapport, No. 95, March 1986.
[6] B. Balassa, "Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative
Advantage", The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 33,
No 2, 1965, pp. 99-123.
[7] J. Donges, "The Second Enlargement of the Community", Kieler Studien
171, Germany, 1982.
[8] J. M. Finger, D. de Rosa, "Trade Overlap, Comparative Advantage and
Protection", in: Herbert Giersch (Eds), On the Economics of Intra-
Industry Trade, T├╝bingen, 1979, pp. 213-240.
[9] J. M. Finger, M. E. Kreinin, "A Measure of Export Similarity and its
possible Use", Economic Journal, No: 89, 1979, pp. 905-912.
[10] C. F. Laaser, K. Schrader, "European Integration and Changing Trade
Patterns: The Case of the Baltic States", Kiel Working Paper, No 1088,
January 2002, 51 pp.
[11] B. Hindley, A. Smith, "Comparative Advantage and Trade in Services",
World Economy, Vol.7, No.4, 1984, pp. 369-389.
[12] A. V. Deardorff, "Comparative Advantage and International Trade and
Investment in Services", in Robert M. Stern, (ed.), Trade and Investment
in Services: Canada/US Perspectives, Toronto: Ontario Economic
Council, 1985, pp. 39-71.
[13] Y. Sazanami, S. Urata, "Trade in Services: Theory, Current Situation
and Issues", Touyoukeizaishinpousya, 1990.
[14] UNCTAD, "UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics", 2005, 2006.
[15] IMF, "Balance of Payments and International Investment Position
Statistics", 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
[16] IMF, "Balance of Payments Manual (BPM5)", 1993.
[17] B. Yilmaz, "International Competitiveness of Turkey with the EU: A
Comparison with Greece, Portugal, Spain and the EU/12/15", in The
Political Economy of Turkey in the Post-Soviet Era, edited by Libby
Rittenberg, Prauger Publishing Company, 1996, pp. 79-95.
[18] G. Lafay, "The Measurement of Revealed Comparative Advantages", in
M. G. Dagenais and P. A. Muet (eds), International Trade Modelling,
London: Chapman & Hall, 1992, pp. 209-234.
[19] G. C. Hufbauer, J. C. Chilas, "Specialization by Industrial Countries:
Extent and Consequence", in: Herbert Hirsch (Ed.), The International
Division of Labour, Problems and Perspectives, International
Symposium, T├╝bingen, 1974, pp. 3-38.