Virtual Reality Classrooms Strategies for Creating a Social Presence

Delivering course material via a virtual environment is beneficial to today-s students because it offers the interactivity, real-time interaction and social presence that students of all ages have come to accept in our gaming rich community. It is essential that the Net Generation also known as Generation Why, have exposure to learning communities that encompass interactivity to form social and educational connections. As student and professor become interconnected through collaboration and interaction in a virtual learning space, relationships develop and students begin to take on an individual identity. With this in mind the research project was developed to investigate the use of virtual environments on student satisfaction and the effectiveness of course delivery. Furthermore, the project was designed to integrate both interactive (real-time) classes conducted in the Virtual Reality (VR) environment while also creating archived VR sessions for student use in retaining and reviewing course content.

Authors:

• Elizabeth M. Hodge
• M.H.N. Tabrizi
• Mary A. Farwell
• Karl L. Wuensch

Keywords:

• Virtual Reality
• Social Presence
• Virtual Environments
• Course Delivery Methods.

References:

[1] Amon, T., & Valencic, V., (2000). VRML. Enhanced learning in
biology and medicine. Future Generation Computer Systems. 17(1):1-6.
[2] Bannan-Ritland, B., Bragg, W. & Collins, M. Linking Theory,
Educational Constructs, and Instructional Strategies in Web-based
Course Development. Retrieved online 07/14/06 from
http://www.virtual.gmu.edu/EDIT611/BannanWBC.pdf
[3] Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in
classrooms: a reconceptualization of educational practice. In C.
Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new
paradigm of instructional theory, 2. 269-292. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
[4] Bossé, Michael J. & Rider, Robin L. (October, 2005). Investigating
distance professional development: lessons learned from research.
Published in the Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the
International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,
Roanoke, VA, October 20-23.
[5] Cobb, P., Stephen, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001).
Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the
Learning Sciences, 10 (1&2), 113-163.
[6] Dede, C. (2004, September). Enabling distributed learning communities
via emerging technologies - Part one. T.H.E. Journal, 32(2), 12-22.
www.thejournal.com.
[7] Dickey M. D., (2003) Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical affordances and
constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning.
Distance Education 24(1): 105-121.
[8] Foley, A. R. (2007). Distance education: Understandings of disability
and the provision of access to content. International Journal of
Instructional Media, 34, 1, 17-27.
[9] Garrison, R., Anderson, T. and Archer,W. (2000) Critical Inquiry in a
Text-based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education,
The Internet in Higher Education, 2, 2-3,, 87-105,
<http://communitiesofinquiry.com/documents/CTinTextEnvFinal.pdf>
(retrieved March 15, 2007)
[10] Hiemstra, R., and Poley, J. (2007). Lessons pertinent for teaching with
computers. Clearing House, 80, 3, 144-148.
[11] Hodge, E., (2006). If you can't beat um...join um! The quest to create a
social presence in student's lives. Submitted for publication.
[12] Hodge, E., Bosse, M., Faulconer, J., Fewell, M., (2006). International
Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning December
2006 5 Vol. 3. No. 12. Innovations in Distance Education. (1998). An
emerging set of guiding principles and practices for the design and
development of distance education. University Park, PA: The
Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved 01/22/07 from
http://www.worldcampus.psu.edu/ide/docs/guiding_principles.pdf
[13] Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M.,
(2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media
education for the 21st century. (White Paper). MacArthur Foundation.
Retrieved 06/01/07 from
http://www.digitallearning.macfound.org/site/c.enJLKQNlFiG/b.210877
3/apps/nl/content2.asp?content_id=%7BCD911571-0240-4714-A93B-
1D0C07C7B6C1%7D&notoc=1
[14] Lave, J. & Wenger, W. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral
participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[15] Lefebvre H. (1991) The production of space. Cambridge, MA:
Blackwell.
[16] Makoe, M. Q. (2006). South African distance students- accounts of
learning in socio-cultural context: A habitus analysis. Race, Ethnicity &
Education, 9, 4, 361-380.
[17] McPherson, M., & Baptista-Nunes, M., (2004). The failure of a virtual
social space (VSS) designed to create a learning community: Lessons
learned. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 305-321.
[18] Media Grid Initiative: Immersive Education (Boston College). Retrieved
06/05/07 at http://immersiveeducation.org/
[19] Russo, T., & Koesten, J. (2005). Prestige, Centrality, and Learning: A
Social Network Analysis of an Online Class. Communication Education,
54(3), 254-261.
[20] Rossett, A. (2005). Moving Online. T+D, 59(2), 14-15.
[21] Rourk, W., (2000) Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case
of spatial ability Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22 (6), 392-
404.
[22] L. Rourke et al., "Assessing Social Presence in Asynchronous Textbased
Computer Conferencing," Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 14,
No. 2, 2001, <http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol14.2/rourke_et_al.html>
(retrieved March 15, 2007)
[23] V. Tinto, Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of College
Attrition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), as cited in
Rourke et al., ibid.
[24] U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
(2003). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary
Institutions: 2000-2001 (NCES 2003-017), retrieved May 4, 2007 at
http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80
[25] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher
order psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
[26] Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
[27] Wang, A., & Newlin, M. (2001, August). Online Lectures: Benefits for
the Virtual Classroom. T H E Journal, 29(1), 17.
[28] Winn, W. (1993). A Conceptual Basis for Educational Applications of
Virtual Reality.Technical Report TR-93-9, Human Interface Technology
Laboratory - University of Washington.
[29] Winn, W. 1997. Advantages of a Theory-Based Curriculum in
Instructional Technology. Educational Technology, 97(1):34-41.
[30] Wise J M (1999) Culture and technology CULTSTUD-L Columns.
Retrieved on 8/20/2006 from
http://www.cas.usf.edu/communication/rodman/cultstud/columns/jw-24-
10-99.html
[31] Zuhairi, A., Wahyono, E., & Suratinah, S. (2006). The historical
context, current development and future challenges of distance education
in Indonesia. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7, 1, 95-101.