Using Mixed Methods in Studying Classroom Social Network Dynamics

In a multi-cultural learning context, where ties are
weak and dynamic, combining qualitative with quantitative research
methods may be more effective. Such a combination may also allow
us to answer different types of question, such as about people’s
perception of the network. In this study the use of observation,
interviews and photos were explored as ways of enhancing data from
social network questionnaires. Integrating all of these methods was
found to enhance the quality of data collected and its accuracy, also
providing a richer story of the network dynamics and the factors that
shaped these changes over time.





References:
[1] S. Wasserman & K. Faust. Social network analysis: Methods and
applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[2] D. Knoke & S. Yang. Social Network Analysis (2nd Edition). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.
[3] J. Scott. Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage, 2000.
[4] S. Borgatti, A. Mehra, D. Brass & G. Labianca. "Network analysis in the
social sciences". Science, vol323, (5916) 2009, pp. 892-895.
[5] vanDuijn, M. A. J., &Vermunt, J. K. (2006). What Is Special About
Social Network Analysis? Methodology: European Journal of Research
Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2(1), 2-6.
[6] Killworth, P. D., & Bernard, H. R. (1976). Informant accuracy in social
network data. Human Organization, 35(3), 269-286.
[7] Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual review
of sociology, 16(1), 435-463.
[8] Crossley, N. (2010). "The Social World of the Network: Combining
Qualitative and Quantitative Elements in Social Network Analysis".
Sociologica, 1.
[9] Daradoumis, T., Martínez-Monés, A., &Xhafa, F. (2006). A layered
framework for evaluating on-line collaborative learning interactions.
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(7), 622-635.
[10] deLaat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R. J. (2007).
Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and
computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network
Analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative
Learning, 2(1), 87-103.
[11] Edwards, G. (2010). "Mixed-method approaches to social network
analysis". National Centre for Research Methods, Methods Review
Paper.
[12] Hollstein, B. (2011). "Qualitative Approaches". In: Carrington, P. &
Scott, J. (eds.), Handbook of social network analysis. London: Sage
[13] Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gómez, E., & De la Fuente, P.
(2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for
the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education,
41(4), 353-368.
[14] Martínez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Rubia-Avi, B.,
Jorrín-Abellán, I., & Marcos, J. A. (2006). Studying participation
networks in collaboration using mixed methods. International Journal of
Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 383-408.
[15] Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Tardajos, J., Velloso, O., &Villacorta, M.
B. (2003). Integration of SNA in a mixed evaluation approach for the
study of participatory aspects of collaboration.
[16] Sack, W., Détienne, F., Ducheneaut, N., Burkhardt, J. M., Mahendran,
D., & Barcellini, F. (2006). A methodological framework for sociocognitive
analyses of collaborative design of open source software.
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 15(2), 229-250.
[17] Suh, H., Kang, M., Moon, K. & Jang, H. (2005). "Identifying peer
interaction patterns and related variables in community-based learning".
Presented at Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, pp. 657-
661. Taipei, Taiwan.
[18] Borgatti, S., Everett, M. & Freeman, L. (2002). Ucinet 6 for windows:
Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
[19] Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C. & Wellman, B. (1997). "Studying
online social networks". Journal of Computer Mediated Communication,
3 (1).
[20] Jack, S. (2010). "Approaches to studying networks: Implications and
outcomes". Journal of Business Venturing, 25 (1), 120-137.
[21] Dawson, S. (2008). A study of the relationship between student social
networks and sense of community. Educational Technology and Society,
11(3), 224–238.
[22] Erlin, B. Y., Yusof, N., & Rahman, A. A. (2008). Integrating Content
Analysis and Social Network Analysis for analyzing Asynchronous
Discussion Forum. International Symposium on the Information
Technology ITSim 26-28 Aug. 2008, 1-8.
[23] Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and
mixed methods approach. London: Sage Publications.
[24] Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
[25] Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation method.
London: Sage Publications.
[26] Neuman, L (2006). Social research methods: qualitative and
quantitative approach. London: Pearson Allyn& Bacon.
[27] Taha, Nashrawan, and Andrew Cox. "International students' networks: a
case study in a UK university." Studies in Higher Education ahead-ofprint
(2014): 1-17.
[28] Taha, Nashrawan, and Andrew M. Cox. "Social network dynamics in
international students' learning." In Proceedings of the 7th International
Conference on Networked Learning 2010, pp. 396-403. Sheffield, 2010.
[29] Creswell, J.W. & Tashakkori, A. (2007). "Editorial: Differing
Perspectives on Mixed Methods Research". Journal of mixed methods
research, 1 (4), 303- 308.
[30] Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods
Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the
Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
[31] Haythornthwaite, C. (2008). Learning relations and networks in webbased
communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 4
(2), 140-158.
[32] Kumar, R. (2005). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for
beginners. London: Sage Publication.
[33] Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for
analyzing talk, text and interaction. Thousands Oak: Sage Publications.
[34] Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2008). Interviews: An introduction to
qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications.
[35] Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using
thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding
and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,
5(1). Retrieved June 29, 2009, from
http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_1/PDF/FEREDAY.PDF.
[36] Braun, V. and V. Clarke (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.
Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(1), 77–101.
[37] Bogdan, R. &Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An
Introduction to Theory and Methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and
Bacon.
[38] Strauss, A.L. & Corbin, J.M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd
ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[39] Miles, M.B. &Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An
Expanded Sourcebook Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [40] Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic
analysis and code development. Sage.
[41] Bryman, Alan, and Melissa Hardy, eds. Handbook of data analysis.
Sage, 2004.
[42] Otte, E. & Rousseau, R. (2002). "Social network analysis: a powerful
strategy, also for the information sciences". Journal of Information
Science, 28 (6), 441- 453.
[43] Schultz-Jones, B. (2009). "Examining information behavior through
social networks: an interdisciplinary review". Journal of Documentation,
65 (4), 592-631
[44] Emirbayer, M. & Goodwin, J. (1994). "Network analysis, culture, and
the problem of agency". The American Journal of Sociology, 99 (6),
1411-1454.