Tree Based Data Aggregation to Resolve Funneling Effect in Wireless Sensor Network

In wireless sensor network, sensor node transmits the sensed data to the sink node in multi-hop communication periodically. This high traffic induces congestion at the node which is present one-hop distance to the sink node. The packet transmission and reception rate of these nodes should be very high, when compared to other sensor nodes in the network. Therefore, the energy consumption of that node is very high and this effect is known as the “funneling effect”. The tree based-data aggregation technique (TBDA) is used to reduce the energy consumption of the node. The throughput of the overall performance shows a considerable decrease in the number of packet transmissions to the sink node. The proposed scheme, TBDA, avoids the funneling effect and extends the lifetime of the wireless sensor network. The average case time complexity for inserting the node in the tree is O(n log n) and for the worst case time complexity is O(n2).




References:
[1] Akyildiz I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., And Cyirci, E,
"Wireless sensor networks: A survey", Computer Network. 38, 4 , 393–
422,2002.
[2] A. Alemdar, M. Ibnkahla.”Wireless Sensor Networks: Applications and
Challenges”, IEEE,2007.
[3] M. Bala Krishna, Noble Vashishta.”Energy Efficient Data Aggregation
Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks”, 2013 5th International
Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication
Networks.
[4] Chi Trung Ngo, Hoon Oh. “A tree-based mobility management using
message aggregation based on a skewed wait time assignment in
infrastructure based MANETs”-Wireless Netw (2014) 20:537–552.
[5] Chih-Hsiao Tsai, Hao-Yi Huang, Chih-Wei Hung and Ying-Hong
Wang. “TDAM: A Tree-based Data Aggregation Mechanism in
Wireless Sensor Networks”, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on
Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ISPACS
2012) November 4-7, 2012.
[6] Chunping Wang, Weihong Wang, Jian Jiao and Feihang Ge. “A Multihop
and Load Balanced Routing Protocol Oriented to the Neighbors of
the Sink for Wireless Sensor Networks”, IEEE Global High Tech
Congress on Electronics, 2012.
[7] Dina S. Deif, Yasser Gadallah, “Classification of Wireless Sensor
Networks Deployment Techniques”, IEEE Communications Surveys
and Tutorials 16(2): 834-855 (2014).
[8] Fei Hu, Carter May, Xiaojun Cao.” Data Aggregation in Distributed
Sensor Networks: Towards An Adaptive Timing Control”, Proceedings
of the Third International Conference on Information Technology: New
Generations (ITNG'06) ,IEEE 2006.
[9] Nakamura F, Loureiro A.F , and C. Frery, “Data Fusion for Wireless
Sensor Networks: Techniques, Models, and Classifications,” ACM
Computing Surveys, Vol. 39, No. 3, Article 9, 2007, August 2007.
[10] Ngo, T. C., Pham, T. M., & Oh, H. (2011). “An optimized message
aggregation technique to resolve the funneling effect in mobility
management”. In Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on
selected topics in mobile and wireless networking (ICOST), 2011 (pp.
104–109).
[11] Qingwen Zhao and Yanmin Zhu, “An Efficient Data Aggregation
Algorithm in Delay Tolerant Vehicular Networks”, Ad-hoc and Sensor
Networking Symposium, IEEE ICC 2014.
[12] Taewoo ee, Dongsoo S. Kim, Hyunseung Choo and Mihui Kim. “A
Delay-Aware Scheduling for Data Aggregation in Duty-Cycled Wireless
Sensor Networks”, IEEE 9th International Conference on Mobile Adhoc
and Sensor Networks, 2013.
[13] X. Xu, X. Li, X. Mao, S. Tang, and S. Wang, “A delay-efficient
algorithm for data aggregation in multihop wireless sensor networks,”
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 163–175, Jan
2011.
[14] Yebin Chen, Jian Shu, Sheng Zhang, Linlan Liu, Limin Sun, “Data
Fusion In Wireless Sensor Networks”, Second International Symposium
on Electronic Commerce and Security,2009.