The Study of Japanese Religion and State Power in Early Tokugawa Period Based on the Religious Rule of Tokugawa Ieyasu

Tokugawa period has been highly discussed by many scholars as the transition from feudal society to capitalist nation. Religion was a very significant feature of Tokugawa period because of the association of religion and state power in Tokugawa period. One important way to interpret the relationship between religion and state power in Tokugawa period is to discuss the religious rule of Tokugawa Ieyasu, who was the first general in Tokugawa period. In the past researches, Sonehara and Hirano have discussed the religious belief of Tokugawa Ieyasu. Sonehara focuses on the Tokugawa Ieyasu’s religious belief of Tiantai Buddhist and his religious activities. He holds the view that Tokugawa Ieyasu proceeded religious activities frequently in his old age is aimed at consolidating his political position. Compared with the analysis of Sonehara, Hirano’s analysis pays more attention to the connection between Tokugawa Ieyasu and Jingtu buddhist. On the other hand, such as Takaki, Okuwa and other researchers have also discussed the religious belief of Tokugawa Ieyasu. However, most of the research has focused on the exploration of Tokugawa Ieyasu's religious view, ignoring the specific religious rules and interpretation of the concept of Tokugawa Ieyasu’s deification. This paper aims to focus on the religious policy and religious activities and the deification of Tokugawa Ieyasu to investigate the religious rule of the early Tokugawa period by the method of thought history and religious history. Through analyzing the historical data of temples and the last words of Tokugawa Ieyasu, this paper concludes that Tokugawa Ieyasu adopted flexible policies for different denominations in the early period. At the same time, Tokugawa Ieyasu was aimed at creating godship which the main factor is the spirit of warriors, thereby making religion turn into a vital part of the shogunate power.

Authors:



References:
[1] Fukaya Katsumi.Kinsei no Kokka Shakai to Tenno[M].Tokyo : Azekura Shobo,1991, pp.82
[2] Nakamura Takaya.Tokugawa Ieyasu Monjyo no Kenkyu(1)[M].Tokyo: Nihon Gakujyutsu Shinkokai,1958, pp.306.
[3] Nakamura Takaya.Tokugawa Ieyasu Monjyo no Kenkyu(1)[M].Tokyo: Nihon Gakujyutsu Shinkokai,1958, pp.398.
[4] Yamanashi Kenritsu Toshokan.Kaikuni Shaki Jiki(4)[M].Kofu : Yamanashi Kenritsu Toshokan,1969, pp. 102.
[5] Nakamura Takaya.Tokugawa Ieyasu Monjyo no Kenkyu(1)[M].Tokyo: Nihon Gakujyutsu Shinkokai,1958, pp.510.
[6] Nakamura Takaya.Tokugawa Ieyasu Monjyo no Kenkyu(1)[M].Tokyo: Nihon Gakujyutsu Shinkokai,1958, pp.557.
[7] Sunpuki[M]//Ono Shinni.Ieyasu Shiryoshu.Tokyo:Jinbutsu Oraisha ,1965, pp.46.
[8] Nikkoshishi Hensan Iinkai.Nikkoshishi(2)[M].Tokyo : Daiichi Hoki Shuppan,1979, pp. 38.
[9] Sonehara Satoshi. Shinkun Ieyasu no Tanjyo[M].Tokyo:Yoshikawa Kobunkan,2008.
[10] Sonehara Satoshi.Tokugawa Ieyasu Shinkakuka e no Michi[M].Tokyo, Yoshikawa Kobunkan,1996.
[11] Sunpuki[M]//Ono Shinni.Ieyasu Shiryoshu.Tokyo:Jinbutsu Oraisha ,1965, pp.112.
[12] Sunpuki[M]//Ono Shinni.Ieyasu Shiryoshu.Tokyo:Jinbutsu Oraisha ,1965, pp.206.
[13] Sunpuki[M]//Ono Shinni.Ieyasu Shiryoshu.Tokyo:Jinbutsu Oraisha ,1965, pp.52.
[14] Sunpuki[M]//Ono Shinni.Ieyasu Shiryoshu.Tokyo:Jinbutsu Oraisha ,1965, pp.127.
[15] Tokugawa Yoshinobu.Shinshu Tokugawa Ieyasu Monjyo no Kenkyu[M].Tokyo:Yoshikawa Kobunkan,1983:448-449.
[16] Junyong Zhao.The Formation of the “Theroy” and the “Practice” of Tendai Sect[J].Qiqihaer University Journal,2016(3), pp. 16.
[17] Naito Chiso.Tokugawa Jyugodaishi(1)[M].Tokyo:Jinbutsu Oraisha ,1968, pp.72.
[18] Suden.Motomitsukokushi Nikki(20)[M].Tokyo:Dai Nihon Bukkyo Zensho Hakkojyo,1922, pp. 1094.
[19] Naito Chiso.Tokugawa Jyugodaishi(1)[M].Tokyo:Jinbutsu Oraisha ,1968, pp.264.
[20] Kuroita Katsumi.Tokugawa Jikki(2)[M].Tokyo:Yoshikawa Kobunkan,1964, pp. 93.
[21] Takafuji Harutoshi.Nikko Toshogu no Nazo[M].Tokyo:Kodansha, 1996.
[22] Nikkosan Engi[M]//Sakurai Tokutaro,Jisha Engi.Tokyo:Iwanami Shoten,1975, pp. 288.