The Place and Effects of Information Management in Corporate Identity

Corporate identity, which has several advantages such
that the employees become integrated with their corporations,
corporation is distinguished from its competitors and it is recognized
by the masses, is the total of the distinctive corporate features that
and corporation has. That the information takes part in production as
a more important component than labor and capital has required that
the corporations are reorganized as information-based. Therefore,
information and its management have reached a basic and prevalent
position in having sustainable competitive advantage. Thanks to the
information management which regulates the information and makes
it reachable and available, information will be produced in line with a
specific purpose in the corporations and be used in all the corporate
processes. As an auxiliary power for increase in the economic
potential, efficiency and productivity of the corporation, corporate
identity consists of four components. These are corporate philosophy,
corporate design, corporate behavior and corporate communication.
In this study, the effects of the information management on corporate
identity are discussed from the point of these four elements.

• H. Buluthan Cetintas

• Corporate identity
• information management.

<p>[1] A. Davis, Mastering Public Relations. Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan,
2007.
[2] C. Fill, Marketing Communications: Interactivity, Communities and
Content. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2009.
[3] C. Hamilton, Communicating for Results: A Guide for Business and the
Professions. California: Thomson Pub., 2008.
[4] D. Hellriegel and J. W. Slocum, Organizational Behavior. Mason:
South-Western, Cengage Learning, 2011.
[5] E. A. Benowitz, Principles of Management. New York: Hungry Minds,
2001.
[6] E. Wood, Corporate Identity. In The Public Relations Handbook.
London: Routledge, 2004.
[7] F. Luthans, Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
[8] J. Champoux, Organizational Behavior: Integrating Individuals,
Groups, and Organizations. New York: Taylor &amp; Francis, 2011.
[9] J. Cornelissen, Corporate Communications: Theory and Practice.
London: Sage Pub., 2004.
[10] M. A. Hitt, J. S. Black and L. W. Porter, Management. New Jersey:
Prentice Hall, 2012.
[11] M. E. Jennex, Productivity Impacts from Using Knowledge. In Case
Studies in Knowledge Management. London: Idea Group Publishing,
2005.
[12] M. Riel and C.J. Fombrun, Essentials of Corporate Communication.
New York: Routledge Pub., 2007.
[13] O. Thyssen, Aesthetic Communication. London: Palgrave Macmillan,
2010.
[14] P. Copley, Marketing Communications Management: Concepts and
Theories, Cases and Practices. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-
Heinemann, 2004.
[15] P. D. Pelsmacker, M. Geuens and J.V. Bergh, Marketing
Communications: A European Perspective. Harlow: Pearson Education
Limited, 2010.
[16] P. Gottschalk, Strategic Knowledge Management Technology. London:
IdeaGroup Publishing, 2005.
[17] R. L. Daft, Management. Mason: Thomson South-Western, 2008.
[18] R. M. Grant, ContemporaryStrategy Analysis. John West Sussex:
Wiley&amp;Sons, 2010.
[19] R. R. Dolphin, The Fundamentals of Corporate Communication. Jordan
Hill: Butterworth-Heinemann Pub., 2000.
[20] R. West and L. H. Turner, Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis
and Application. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2010.
[21] S. Brelade and C. Harman,A Practical Guide to Knowledge
Management. London: Thorogood, 2003.
[22] S. L. McShane and M. A. Glinow, Organizational Behavior: Emerging
Knowledge and Practice for The Real World. New York,: McGraw-Hill,
2010.
[23] S. Oliver, Public Relations Strategy. London: Kogan Page Ltd., 2010.
[24] T. C. Melewar, &ldquo;Determinants of The Corporate Identity Construct: A
Review of The Literature&rdquo;,Journal of Marketing Communications vol.9,
4, 2003, pp. 195-220.
[25] T. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge: How Organizations
Manage What They Know. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press,
1998.</p>