The Design and Development of Multimedia Pronunciation Learning Management System

The proposed Multimedia Pronunciation Learning Management System (MPLMS) in this study is a technology with profound potential for inducing improvement in pronunciation learning. The MPLMS optimizes the digitised phonetic symbols with the integration of text, sound and mouth movement video. The components are designed and developed in an online management system which turns the web to a dynamic user-centric collection of consistent and timely information for quality sustainable learning. The aim of this study is to design and develop the MPLMS which serves as an innovative tool to improve English pronunciation. This paper discusses the iterative methodology and the three-phase Alessi and Trollip model in the development of MPLMS. To align with the flexibility of the development of educational software, the iterative approach comprises plan, design, develop, evaluate and implement is followed. To ensure the instructional appropriateness of MPLMS, the instructional system design (ISD) model of Alessi and Trollip serves as a platform to guide the important instructional factors and process. It is expected that the results of future empirical research will support the efficacy of MPLMS and its place as the premier pronunciation learning system.




References:
[1] Internet World Stats. World Internet users and population stats. 2011
[cited 2011 June 17]; Available from:
http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
[2] Ross D, editor. Learning English simulation learning for non-native
English speakers incorporating edutainment methodology. Global Learn
Asia Pacific 2010, AACE; 2010; Penang, Malaysia.
[3] Nunan E, editor. Flexible delivery: What is it and why is it a part of
current educational debate? Higher Education Research and
Development Society of Australasia: Different Approaches: Theory and
Practice in Higher Education; 1996; Perth, Western Australia.
[4] Schwier RA, Misanchuk ER. Interactive multimedia instruction. New
Jersey: Educational Technology Publications; 1993.
[5] Winn W, editor. Learning in hyperspace. Online Conference: The
Potential of the Web; 1997; Adelphi, MD: International University
Consortium and Institute for Distance Education.
[6] Mayadas F. Asynchronous learning networks: A Sloan Foundation
perspective. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 1997;1(1).
[7] Sch├╝tz R. The importance of pronunciation. 2008 [cited 2011 April 15];
Available from: http://www.sk.com.br/pronunciation.ppt.
[8] The International Phonetic Association. Handbook of the International
Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic
Alphabet. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
[9] Hossain SA, Rahman ML. Framework for component-based multimedia
courseware development. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Center for Research and
Training, East West University; 2007.
[10] Bostock S. Courseware Engineering - an overview of the courseware
development process. 2003 [cited 2011 June 15]; Available from:
http://www.keele.org.uk/docs/atceng.htm.
[11] Hunter A, Ellis A, editors. The development process for courseware
material: A computing methodology approach. The ASCILITE 2000:
Learning to Choose, Choosing to Learn; 2000; Southern Cross
University, Coffs Harbour NSW Australia.
[12] Jenkins N. How to make software: An introduction to software
development 2005 [cited 2011 June 15]; Available from:
http://www.nickjenkins.net/prose/makingSoftware.pdf.
[13] Alessi SM, Trollip SR. Multimedia for learning: Methods and
development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
[14] Miller M. Chapter summaries of multimemedia for learning: Methods
and development, 3rd edition. 2003 [cited 2011 June 15]; Available
from: http://mlmiller.myweb.uga.edu/6200project/alessi.htm.
[15] European Commission. Formative evaluation. 2007 [cited 2011 June
17]; Available from:
http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/evalsed/
sourcebooks/method_techniques/planning_structuring/formative/main_s
teps_en.htm.
[16] Bevan N, Singhal N, Werner B, Degler D, Wilson C. Formative
evaluation. 2009 [cited 2011 June 17]; Available from:
http://www.usabilitybok.org/methods/formative-evaluation.
[17] Durdu PO, Yalabik N, Cagiltay K. A Distributed online curriculum and
courseware development model. Educational Technology & Society.
2009;12(1):230-48.
[18] Retalis S, editor. A courseware development methodology for open and
distance learning. CAISE- 97; 1997; Barcelona, Spain.
[19] Preston A. Types of usability methods. Usability Interface.
2004;10(3):15.
[20] National Training and Education Division Responder Training
Development Center. Implementation phase. 2011 [cited 2011 June 23];
Available from:
https://www.firstrespondertraining.gov/rtdc/state/review.htm.
[21] Princeton University. Princeton development methodology -
Implementation phase. 2011 [cited 2011 June 23]; Available from:
http://web.princeton.edu/dms/public/methodology/dev/instbase.html.