Sustainable Maintenance Model for Infrastructure in Egypt

Infrastructure maintenance is a great challenge facing sustainable development of infrastructure assets due to the high cost of passive implementation of a sustainable maintenance plan. An assessment model of sustainable maintenance for highway infrastructure projects in Egypt is developed in this paper. It helps in improving the implementation of sustainable maintenance criteria. Thus, this paper has applied the analytical hierarchy processes (AHP) to rank and explore the weight of 26 assessment indicators using three hierarchy levels containing the main sustainable categories and subcategories with related indicators. Overall combined weight of each indicator for sustainable maintenance evaluation has been calculated to sum up to a sustainable maintenance performance index (SMI). The results show that the factor "Preventive maintenance cost" has the highest relative contribution factor among others (13.5%), while two factors of environmental performance have the least weights (0.7%). The developed model aims to provide decision makers with information about current maintenance performance and support them in the decision-making process regarding future directions of maintenance activities. It can be used as an assessment performance tool during the operation and maintenance stage. The developed indicators can be considered during designing the maintenance plan. Practices for successful implementation of the model are also presented.


Authors:



References:
[1] M. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, “Sustainability: Orientation in Maintenance Management—Theoretical Background” In: Golinska P. (eds) EcoProduction and Logistics. EcoProduction (Environmental Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing), 2013, pp. 117-134, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23553-5_8.
[2] D. Owolabi, M. Amusan Lekan, A. Ogunde, and P. Tunji-Olayeni, “Sustainability Strategies in Engineering Infrastructure Maintenance in Developing Countries: Selected South Western Nigeria States Case Study”, Civil and Environmental Research, www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online)Vol.6, No.2, 2014.
[3] M. Tafazzoli, “Maintaining the Sustainability of Critical Infrastructure”, In Management of Critical Infrastructure, IntechOpen, 2019.
[4] M. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, Z. Patryk,"The concept of maintenance sustainability performance assessment by integrating balanced scorecard with non-additive fuzzy integral ", Maintenance and Reliability, September 2018, DOI: 10.17531/ein.2018.4.16
[5] H. Yao, L. Shen, Y. Tan, and J. Hao, “Simulating the impacts of policy scenarios on the sustainability performance of infrastructure projects”, Automation in Construction, 2011, 20(8), 1060-1069.
[6] M. Marzouk, A. Nouh, and M. El-Said, “Developing green bridge rating system using Simos’ procedure”, HBRC journal, January 2013.
[7] E. Sari, A. Shaharoun, A. Ma’aram, and A. Yazid, “Sustainable maintenance performance measures: a pilot survey in Malaysian automotive companies”,Procedia CIRP, 2015, 26, 443-448.
[8] R. Lenort, D. Staš, P. Wicher, D. Holman, and K. Ignatowicz, “Comparative Study of Sustainable Key Performance Indicators in Metallurgical Industry”, Journal of Middle Pomeranian Scientific Society Of The Environment Protection - Annual Set The Environment Protection, Vol.(19), 2017, ISSN 1506-218X, P.P.36-51.
[9] E. Amrina, A. Yulianto and I. Kamil, “ Fuzzy Multi Criteria Approach for Sustainable Maintenance Evaluation in Rubber Industry”, Journal of Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 33, 2019, PP.538-545.
[10] H. Al-Barqawi, and T. Zayed, “Infrastructure management: Integrated AHP/ANN model to evaluate municipal water mains’ performance”, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14(4), 2008, 305-318.
[11] E. Elwakil, "Integrating analytical hierarchy process and regression for assessing construction organizations’ performance", International Journal of Construction Management, 17(1), 2017, 76-88, DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2016.1187247
[12] H. Al-Barqawi, and T. Zayed, “Assessment model of water main conditions. In Pipelines 2006: Service to the Owner, 2006,pp. 1-8, DOI: 10.1061/40854(211)27
[13] G. Longo, E. Padoano, P. Rosato, and S. Strami, "Considerations on the application of AHP/ANP methodologies to decisions concerning a railway infrastructure", In Proceedings of the international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process, 2009, Vol. 20098, pp. 183-202.
[14] R. Rooshdi, M. Majid, S. Sahamir, and N. Ismail, "Relative importance index of sustainable design and construction activities criteria for green highway", Journal of Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2018, Vol. 63, Pages 151-156, ISBN 978-88-95608-61-7; ISSN 2283-9216.
[15] T. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”, International journal of services sciences, 2008, 1(1), 83-98.
[16] D. Salem, and E. Elwakil, “Develop an Assessment Model for Healthcare Facilities: A Framework to Prioritize the Asset Criticality for the Capital Renewals”, International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, 2018 (ICCREM 2018), August 9–10, 2018 | Charleston, South Carolina, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, doi.org/10.1061/9780784481752.011
[17] E. Mu, and M. Pereyra-Rojas, “Understanding the analytic hierarchy process”, In Practical decision making, 2017, pp. 7-22, Springer, Cham.