Sex Differentiation of Elm Nymphalid (Nymphalis polychloros Linnaeus, 1758) on Pupal Stage

This study was conducted to determine sex differentiation of laboratory reared Elm nymphalid (Nymphalis polychloros Linnaeus, 1758) by examining the morphological structure of pupal stage. Laboratory colony of elm nymphalid, reared on pear leaves, was used to set up experiments. It was performed with 5 replications having 8 pupae for each replication. Dorsal, ventral and lateral parts of external morphological structures of pupae were examined by Olympus SZX9 stereozoom microscope and photographed. When fully grown, mature larvae wander the highest part of the rearing cage and pupae were formed hanging by cremaster. After completing prepupa stage about 1.5±0.3 days, they all pupated. Pupal stage was completed at 24±1°C about 4.38±1.20 days. Pupal weights were 0.483±0.05 g in females and 0.392±0.08 g (n=40) in males respectively. Pupal emergence rate was 95%, with 22 females and 16 males. Examinations of ventral parts of 8th, 9th, and 10th abdominal segments revealed that anal opening were found at 10th abdominal segment in both sexes, 3 lumps were determined at 9th abdominal segments then the specific opening structure at 8th segment was only found on female pupae.

Authors:

• Hanife Genc

Keywords:

• Butterfly
• Nymphalis polychloros
• pupae
• sex differentiation.

References:

[1] D. J. Harvey, “Higher classification of the Nymphalidae. Re In: Nijhout
HF, ed. The development and evolution of anglewings butterfly wing
patterns”, Washington: Smithsonian University Press, 255–276, 1991.
[2] G. Hesselbarth, H. V. Oorschot, and S. Wagener, ”Die Tagfalter der
Türkei”, Selbstverlag Sigbert Wagener, 3 Band, pp. 1354, 1995.
[3] A. Baytas, “A field guide to the butterflies of Turkey”, NTV Press, 218p.
[4] B. Kovancı, N. S. Gencer, and O. B. Kovancı, “Bursa İli’nde bulunan
Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera) familyasına ait türlerin yayılışı ve bugünkü
statüleri”. Turk. entomol. Dergisi, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 63-80, 2007.
[5] H. Genc, “Determination of sex in pupae of Phyciodes phaon
(Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)”, Florida Entomologist, vol. 88, no. 4, pp.
536-537, 2005.
[6] A. J. Anton, and A. Garrido, “Differences in the morphology of male
and female pupae of Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae”
Florida Entomologist, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 603-606, 1996.
[7] J. E. Eaton, Lepidopteran Anatomy. Wiley-Interscience Series in Insect
Morphology, Carl W. Schaefer (ed.). Wiley-Interscience, New York,
NY.229 pp, 1988.
[8] P. R, Hughes, C. D, Radke, A. A. Renwick, “A simple, low-input
method for continuous laboratory rearing of the monarch butterfly
(Lepidoptera: Danaidae) for research”, American Entomol., vol. 39, pp.
109-111, 1993.
[9] UW-MADISON, “http://manduca.entomology.wisc.edu/teacher/manual/
pupal.html”, 2002.
[10] F. J. Posada1a, I. Virdiana, M. Navies, M. Pava-Ripoll, and P. Hebbar,
“Sexual dimorphism of pupae and adults of the cocoa pod borer,
Conopomorpha cramerella” Journal of Insect Science, vol. 11, no. 52,
pp. 1-8, 2010.
[11] S. Nylin, K. Nyblom, F. Ronquist, N. Janz, J. Belicek and M.Kallersjö,
“Phylogeny of Polygonia, Nymphalis and related butterflies
(Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): a totalevidence analysis”, Zoological
Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 132, pp. 441–468, 2001.
[12] L. Manil, and S. Cuvelier, “Nymphalis xanthomelas (Esper, 1781) Mass
migration, temporary colonisation or sustainable expansion?
(Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)” Lépidoptères vol. 58, pp: 69-74, 2014.
[13] H. Genc, and J. L. Nation, “Life history and biology of Phyciodes phaon
(Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)” Florida Entomologist, vol. 86, no. 4, pp.
445-449, 2003.
[14] H. Genc, and J. L. Nation, “An artificial diet for the butterfly Phyciodes
phaon (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)” Florida Entomologist, vol. 87, no.
2, pp. 194-198, 2004.