Sense of Territoriality and Revitalization of Neighborhood Centers in Boshrooyeh City
The role of neighborhood center as semi public (the
balance space) is disappeared in bonding between private and public
in new urbanism. In this way, a hierarchical principle in the
traditional neighborhood center appears to create or develop the
conditions for residents` relationships and belonging. This paper
evaluates significant of hierarchical principles of the neighborhood
center in residents` territoriality and its factors. In this way Miandeh
neighborhood center from Boshrooyeh city was determined as a case
study area. Results indicated that a hierarchical principle is the best
instrument to improve the territoriality as the subcomponent of place
belonging in residents. The findings help the urban designer to
revitalization the neighborhoods and proceedings in organization of
physical space.
[1] Bechtel, R.B. and A. Churchman, Handbook of environmental
psychology. 2002, New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
[2] Carmona, M., Public places, urban spaces: the dimensions of urban
design. 2003, Oxford; Boston: Architectural Press.
[3] Rapoport, A., The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal
communication approach. 1990, Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
[4] Canter, D., Understanding, Assessing, and Acting in Places: Is an
Integrative Framework Possible? Environment, cognition, and action:
An integrated approach, 1991: p. 191.
[5] Canter, D., Environmental interaction: Psychological approaches to our
physical surroundings. 1976, New York: Internat. Univ. Pr.
[6] Relph, E.C., Place and placelessness. Research in planning and design,
1. 1976, London: Pion.
[7] Stedman, R., Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior
from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and
behavior, 2002. 34(5): p. 561.
[8] Ng, S.H., P.K. Kam, and R.W.M. Pong, People living in ageing
buildings: Their quality of life and sense of belonging. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 2005. 25(3): p. 347-360.
[9] Jacobs, A.B. and D. Appleyard, Toward an urban design manifesto.
Journal of the American Planning Association., 1987. 53(1).
[10] Mishra, A., Boundaries and Territoriality in South Asia: From Historical
Comparisons toTheoretical Considerations. International Studies, 2008.
45.
[11] Sack, R.D., Human territoriality: its theory and history. 1986,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Altman, I., The environment and social behavior: privacy, personal
space, territory, crowding. 1975, Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
[13] Bell, P.A., et al., Environmental psychology. 5th ed. 2001, Belmont,
California: Wadsworth / Thomson Learning.
[14] Hall, E.T., The silent language. 1959, Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
[15] Gottmann, J., The significance of territory. 1973, Charlottesville:
University Press of Virginia.
[16] Kärrholm, M., The Materiality of Territorial Production: A Conceptual
Discussion of Territoriality, Materiality, and the Everyday Life of Public
Space. Space and Culture, 2007. 10.
[17] Hawley, A.H., Human ecology; a theory of community structure. 1950,
New York: Ronald Press Co.
[18] Newman, O., Defensible space; crime prevention through urban design.
1972, New York: Macmillan.
[19] Madanipour, A., Public and private spaces of the city. 2003, London;
New York: Routledge.
[20] Altman, I. and S.M. Low, Place attachment. Human behavior and
environment, v. 12. 1992, New York: Plenum Press.
[21] Brown, G., T. B.Lawrence, and S. L.Robinson, Territoriality in
Organization. Academy of Management Review, 2005. 30(3): p. 577-
594.
[22] Habibi, S.M., Dela cite a la ville (Analyse historique de la conception
urbaine et son aspect physique). 9th ed. 2008, Tehran: University of
Tehran Press 2304.
[23] Lynch, K., The image of the city. 1960, Cambridge: Technology Press.
[24] Sekaran, U., Research methods for business: a skill-building approach.
2000, New York: J. Wiley.
[25] Ho, R., Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and
interpretation with SPSS. 2006, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
[26] Lynch, K., A theory of good city form. 4th ed. 1987, Cambridge, Mass.:
The MIT Press.
[27] Lang, J., Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral
sciences in environmental design. 1987: Van Nostrand Reinhold New
York.
[28] Rofe, Y., Space and community- the spatial foundation of urban
neighborhoods. Berkeley Planning Journal, 1995. 10: p. 107-125.
[1] Bechtel, R.B. and A. Churchman, Handbook of environmental
psychology. 2002, New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
[2] Carmona, M., Public places, urban spaces: the dimensions of urban
design. 2003, Oxford; Boston: Architectural Press.
[3] Rapoport, A., The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal
communication approach. 1990, Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
[4] Canter, D., Understanding, Assessing, and Acting in Places: Is an
Integrative Framework Possible? Environment, cognition, and action:
An integrated approach, 1991: p. 191.
[5] Canter, D., Environmental interaction: Psychological approaches to our
physical surroundings. 1976, New York: Internat. Univ. Pr.
[6] Relph, E.C., Place and placelessness. Research in planning and design,
1. 1976, London: Pion.
[7] Stedman, R., Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior
from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and
behavior, 2002. 34(5): p. 561.
[8] Ng, S.H., P.K. Kam, and R.W.M. Pong, People living in ageing
buildings: Their quality of life and sense of belonging. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 2005. 25(3): p. 347-360.
[9] Jacobs, A.B. and D. Appleyard, Toward an urban design manifesto.
Journal of the American Planning Association., 1987. 53(1).
[10] Mishra, A., Boundaries and Territoriality in South Asia: From Historical
Comparisons toTheoretical Considerations. International Studies, 2008.
45.
[11] Sack, R.D., Human territoriality: its theory and history. 1986,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Altman, I., The environment and social behavior: privacy, personal
space, territory, crowding. 1975, Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
[13] Bell, P.A., et al., Environmental psychology. 5th ed. 2001, Belmont,
California: Wadsworth / Thomson Learning.
[14] Hall, E.T., The silent language. 1959, Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
[15] Gottmann, J., The significance of territory. 1973, Charlottesville:
University Press of Virginia.
[16] Kärrholm, M., The Materiality of Territorial Production: A Conceptual
Discussion of Territoriality, Materiality, and the Everyday Life of Public
Space. Space and Culture, 2007. 10.
[17] Hawley, A.H., Human ecology; a theory of community structure. 1950,
New York: Ronald Press Co.
[18] Newman, O., Defensible space; crime prevention through urban design.
1972, New York: Macmillan.
[19] Madanipour, A., Public and private spaces of the city. 2003, London;
New York: Routledge.
[20] Altman, I. and S.M. Low, Place attachment. Human behavior and
environment, v. 12. 1992, New York: Plenum Press.
[21] Brown, G., T. B.Lawrence, and S. L.Robinson, Territoriality in
Organization. Academy of Management Review, 2005. 30(3): p. 577-
594.
[22] Habibi, S.M., Dela cite a la ville (Analyse historique de la conception
urbaine et son aspect physique). 9th ed. 2008, Tehran: University of
Tehran Press 2304.
[23] Lynch, K., The image of the city. 1960, Cambridge: Technology Press.
[24] Sekaran, U., Research methods for business: a skill-building approach.
2000, New York: J. Wiley.
[25] Ho, R., Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and
interpretation with SPSS. 2006, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
[26] Lynch, K., A theory of good city form. 4th ed. 1987, Cambridge, Mass.:
The MIT Press.
[27] Lang, J., Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral
sciences in environmental design. 1987: Van Nostrand Reinhold New
York.
[28] Rofe, Y., Space and community- the spatial foundation of urban
neighborhoods. Berkeley Planning Journal, 1995. 10: p. 107-125.
@article{"International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences:56963", author = "H. Farkisch and A.I. Che-Ani and V. Ahmadi and M. Surat", title = "Sense of Territoriality and Revitalization of Neighborhood Centers in Boshrooyeh City", abstract = "The role of neighborhood center as semi public (the
balance space) is disappeared in bonding between private and public
in new urbanism. In this way, a hierarchical principle in the
traditional neighborhood center appears to create or develop the
conditions for residents` relationships and belonging. This paper
evaluates significant of hierarchical principles of the neighborhood
center in residents` territoriality and its factors. In this way Miandeh
neighborhood center from Boshrooyeh city was determined as a case
study area. Results indicated that a hierarchical principle is the best
instrument to improve the territoriality as the subcomponent of place
belonging in residents. The findings help the urban designer to
revitalization the neighborhoods and proceedings in organization of
physical space.", keywords = "Belonging, Neighborhood center, Revitalization,
Territoriality", volume = "6", number = "7", pages = "1798-6", }
