Seismic Fragility Functions of RC Moment Frames Using Incremental Dynamic Analyses

A capacity spectrum method (CSM), one of methodologies to evaluate seismic fragilities of building structures, has been long recognized as the most convenient method, even if it contains several limitations to predict the seismic response of structures of interest. This paper proposes the procedure to estimate seismic fragility curves using an incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) rather than the method adopting a CSM. To achieve the research purpose, this study compares the seismic fragility curves of a 5-story reinforced concrete (RC) moment frame obtained from both methods; an IDA method and aCSM. Both seismic fragility curves are similar in slight and moderate damage states whereas the fragility curve obtained from the IDA method presents less variation (or uncertainties) in extensive and complete damage states. This is due to the fact that the IDA method can properly capture the structural response beyond yielding rather than the CSM and can directly calculate higher mode effects. From these observations, the CSM could overestimate seismic vulnerabilities of the studied structure in extensive or complete damage states.

• Seung-Won Lee
• Jong Soo Lee
• Won-Jik Yang
• Hyung-Joon Kim

• Seismic fragility curve
• Incremental dynamic analysis
• Capacity spectrum method
• Reinforced concrete moment frame.

[1] Kircher, C.A., Nassar, A.A. and Kustu, O. (1997) Development of
building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation, Earthquake
Spectra, Vol. 13, No. 4, November, pp. 663–682.
[2] Park, J.N., Choi, E.S. (2007) Fragility Analysis for Evaluation and
Comparison of Seismic Performance of Building Structures, Journal of
the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Vol. 11, No. 3, June, pp.
11-21.
[3] Jang, D.H., Song, J.K., Kang, S.L. and Park, C.H. (2011) Fragility Curve
Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Structuresaccording to
Various Nonlinear Seismic Analysis Methods, Journal of the Earthquake
Engineering Society of Korea, Vol. 15, No. 4, August, pp. 1-12.
[4] Carr, A.J. (2009) Ruaumoko Manual. User Manual for the 2-Dimensional
Version: Ruaumoko2D Vol.2, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
[5] FEMA P695 (2009) Quantification of Building Seismic Performance
Factors: ATC-63 Project Report, BSSC.
[6] Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C.A. (2002) Incremental Dynamic
Analysis, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), pp.
491-514. 2002.
[7] FEMA (2003) HAZUS-MH MR4 technical manual, multi-hazard loss
estimation methodology earthquake model, FEMA, Washington, D.C.
[8] Lee, S.W., Yi, W.H. and Kim, H.J. (2014) Seismic Fragility Functions for
Steel Moment Resisting Frames using Incremental Dynamic Analyses,
The Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of
Korea, Vol. 27, No. 6, December, pp. 509-516.