Scientometrics Analysis of Food Supply Chain Risk Assessment Literature Based on Web of Science Record 1996-2014

This paper presents the results of a study to assess
crucial aspects and the strength of the scientific basis of a typically
interdisciplinary, applied field: food supply chain risk assessment
research. Our approach is based on an advanced scientometrics
analysis that is a quantitative study of the disciplines of science based
on published literature to measure interdisciplinary. This paper aims
to describe the quantity and quality of the publication trends in food
supply chain risk assessment. The publication under study was
composed of 266 articles from database web of science. The results
were analyzed based on date of publication, type of document,
language of the documents, source of publications, subject areas,
authors and their affiliations, and the countries involved in
developing the articles.





References:
[1] Food related illness and death in the United States, 2011, Centers for
Disease Control and prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Vol.5,
No 5.
[2] Kirezieva, Klementina, et al. 2015, Factors affecting the status of food
safety management systems in the global fresh produce chain. Food
Control Vol. 52. [3] Olsson A, Skjoldebrand C. R. 2008, Risk management and quality
assurance through the food supply chain-case studies in the Swedish
food industry. The Open Food Science Journal, Vol. 2.
[4] Marucheck, A., Greis, N., Mena, C., & Cai, L. (2011). Product safety
and security in the global supply chain: Issues, challenges and research
opportunities. Journal of Operations Management, 29(7), 707-720
[5] Bourlakis MA, Weightman PWH, 2007, Food supply chain
management, chapter 15, The future of food supply chain management.
Blackwell publishing, pp 221-230.
[6] CAC (Codex Alimentarius Commission), 2003. Alinorm 03/34: Joint
FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme, (Accessed 12.01.15)
[7] D.M. Lambert, M.C. Cooper, J.D. Pagh Supply chain management:
Implementation issues and research opportunities The International
Journal of Logistics Management, 9 (2) (1998), pp. 1–19
[8] Skjott-Larsen, Tage, and Prabir Bagchi. "Challenges of Integration in
Supply Chain Networks: An European Case Study. ACES Working
Paper 2002.1, August 2002." (2002): 49.
[9] Chen, Xiao-lin, and Jun-wen Feng. "Research on Agricultural Food
Supply Chain Prediction and Control Based on Microbial Forecast."
Canadian Social Science 3.3 (2010): 42-50.
[10] P. Wilson, W.R. Clarke, Insights from industry food safety and
traceability in the agricultural supply chain: using the Internet to deliver
traceability, Supply Chain Management, 3 (3) (1998), pp. 127–133
[11] F. Schwägele 2005, Traceability from a European perspective, Meat
Science, 71 (2005), pp. 164–173
[12] Christopher, Martin, and Helen Peck. "Building the resilient supply
chain." The international journal of logistics management 15.2 (2004):
1-14.
[13] Vass, Neil. "M D. Tracking weakest links in cold chain."(2006).
[14] Diabat, Ali, Kannan Govindan, and Vinay V. Panicker. "Supply chain
risk management and its mitigation in a food industry." International
Journal of Production Research 50.11 (2012): 3039-3050.
[15] Gustavsson, Jenny, et al. "Global food losses and food waste." Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rom (2011).
[16] Leat, Philip, and Cesar Revoredo-Giha. "Risk and resilience in agri-food
supply chains: the case of the ASDA PorkLink supply chain in
Scotland." Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 18.2
(2013): 219-231.
[17] Shirani, Mohsen, and Micaela Demichela. "IT System in the Food
Supply Chain Safety, Application in SMEs Sector." World Academy of
Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social,
Behavioral, Educational, Economic and Management Engineering 9.9
(2015): 2761-2765.
[18] Vinkler P. The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators.
Oxford: chandos; 2010.
[19] Glanzel W & Schubert A. A new classification scheme of science fields
and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes.
Scientometrics 2003; 56(3), 357-367.
[20] Asadzandi S, Shahbodaghi A, Sajjadi S, Kamkarhaghighi M, Hemmat
M.2013.A scientometric study of media literacy literature based on
Scopus record through 2011. Journal of Paramedical Sciences, Vol.4, no.
1:51-57.
[21] SCImago Journal & Country Rank. 2014. Available
at:http://www.scimagojr.com
[22] ERIC: Thesaurus. 2014. Available at http://www.eric.ed.gov/
ERICWebPortal/thesaurusResults.do;jsessionid=VAJ9UsrlzqBVl6Lw1KFNA__.
ericsrv004.
[23] UNESCO thesaurus, 2014. Available at http://databases.unesco.org/
thesaurus/wwwi32.exe/%5Bin=affiche.in%5D/.
[24] Vieira E. S and Gomes J. A. N. F. A comparison of Scopus and Web of
Science for a typical university. Scientometrics 2009. 81(2), 587-600.
[25] Ball R and Tunger D. Science indicators revisited-Science Citation
Index versus SCOPUS: A bibliometric comparison of both citation
databases. Information services and use 2006; 26(4), 293-301.