Role of Community Youths in Conservation of Forests and Protected Areas of Bangladesh

Community living adjacent to forests and Protected
Areas, especially in South Asian countries, have a common practice
in extracting resources for their living and livelihoods. This
extraction of resources, because the way it is done, destroys the biophysical
features of the area. Deforestation, wildlife poaching, illegal
logging, unauthorized hill cutting etc. are some of the serious issues
of concern for the sustainability of the natural resources that has a
direct impact on environment and climate as a whole. To ensure
community involvement in conservation initiatives of the state,
community based forest management, commonly known as Comanagement,
has been in practice in 6 South Asian countries. These
are -India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bhutan and Bangladesh.
Involving community in forestry management was initiated first in
Bangladesh in 1979 and reached as an effective co-management
approach through a several paradigm shifts. This idea of Comanagement
has been institutionalized through a Government Order
(GO) by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of
Bangladesh on November 23, 2009. This GO clearly defines the
structure and functions of Co-management and its different bodies.
Bangladesh Forest Department has been working in association with
community to conserve and manage the Forests and Protected areas
of Bangladesh following this legal document. Demographically
young people constitute the largest segment of population in
Bangladesh. This group, if properly sensitized, can produce valuable
impacts on the conservation initiatives, both by community and
government. This study traced the major factors that motivate
community youths to work effectively with different tiers of comanagement
organizations in conservation of forests and Protected
Areas of Bangladesh. For the purpose of this study, 3 FGDs were
conducted with 30 youths from the community living around the
Protected Areas of Cox’s bazar, South East corner of Bangladesh,
who are actively involved in Co-management organizations. KII were
conducted with 5 key officials of Forest Department stationed at
Cox’s Bazar. 2 FGDs were conducted with the representatives of 7
Co-management organizations working in Cox’s Bazar region and
approaches of different community outreach activities conducted for
forest conservation by 3 private organizations and Projects have been
reviewed. Also secondary literatures were reviewed for the history
and evolution of Co-management in Bangladesh and six South Asian
countries. This study found that innovative community outreach
activities that are financed by public and private sectors involving
youths and community as a whole have played a pivotal role in
conservation of forests and Protected Areas of the region. This
approach can be replicated in other regions of Bangladesh as well as
other countries of South Asia where Co-Management exists in
practice.




References:
[1] Sharma R, DeCosse P, Roy M, et. Al (2008), Co-Management of
Protected Areas in South Asia with Special Reference to Bangladesh,
Nisorgo Support Project, Bangladesh Forest Department (BFD), Dhaka
[2] Sharma R, (2011), Co-Management of Protected Areas in South Asia
with Special Reference to Bangladesh, Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural
Development. 2011, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p01-28. 28p.
[3] Huda KS (2008), Co-management of protected areas in Bangladesh: a
strategy for establishing an institutional framework, Nishorgo Support
Project, Bangladesh Forest Department
[4] DeCosse, Philip J., and Azharul H. Mazumder. "Re-Visiting the Context
for Co-Management.", Nishorgo Support Project, Dhaka
[5] Mohammad Shaheed (2014), Forest Conservation in Protected Areas of
Bangladesh: Policy and Community Development Perspectives, Volume
20 of World forests, Springer, 2014, ISBN: 9783319081472
[6] Rashid, A. M., Craig, D., Mukul, S. A., & Khan, N. A. (2013). A
journey towards shared governance: status and prospects for
collaborative management in the protected areas of Bangladesh. Journal
of forestry research, 24(3), 599-605.