Psychopathic Disorders and Judges Sentencing: Can Neurosciences Change This Aggravating Factor in a Mitigating Factor?

Psychopathic disorders are taking an important part in judge sentencing, especially in Canada. First, we will see how this phenomenon can be illustrated by the high proportion of psychopath offenders incarcerated in North American prisons. Many decisions in Canadians courtrooms seem to point out that psychopathy is often used as a strong argument by the judges to preserve public safety. The fact that psychopathy is often associated with violence, recklessness and recidivism, could explain why many judges consider psychopathic disorders as an aggravating factor. Generally, the judge reasoning is based on Article 753 of Canadian Criminal Code related to dangerous offenders, which is used for individuals who show a pattern of repetitive and persistent aggressive behaviour. Then we will show how, with cognitive neurosciences, the psychopath’s situation in courtrooms would probably change. Cerebral imaging and news data provided by the neurosciences show that emotional and volitional functions in psychopath’s brains are impaired. Understanding these new issues could enable some judges to recognize psychopathic disorders as a mitigating factor. Finally, two important questions ought to be raised in this article: can exploring psychopaths ‘brains really change the judge sentencing in Canadian courtrooms? If yes, can judges consider psychopathy more as a mitigating factor than an aggravating factor?

Authors:

• Kevin Moustapha

Keywords:

• Criminal law
• judges sentencing
• neurosciences
• psychopathy.

References:

[1] Matt Logan et Robert D. Hare, «La psychopathie criminelle:
introduction à l'égard des policiers», (2010), p. 2
[2] Craig S. Neumann et Robert D. HARE, «Psychopathic traits in a large
community sample: Links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence»,
(2008) 76, p. 893-900
[3] Gina M. Vincent et Stephen D. Hart, «Legal uses and assessment of
psychopathy», (2012)
[4] Robert James R. Blair, «Applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective
to the disorder of psychopathy», (2005) 17 Development and
Psychopathology
[5] Henry Werlinder, Psychopathy : a history of the concepts : analysis of
the origin and development of a family of concepts in psychopathology,
Stockholm, Uppsala Universitet, 1978
[6] Jennifer Cox, David S. Dematteo et Elizabeth E. Foster, «The effect of
the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised in capital cases: mock jurors'
responses to the label of psychopathy», (2010) 28 Behavior Science and
the Law; Jenny Laurell et Anna Maria Daderman, «Psychopathy (PCLR)
in a forensic psychiatric sample of homicide offenders: some
reliability issues», (2007) 30International journal of law and psychiatry
[7] Julien-Daniel Guelfi et American Psychiatric Association, DSM-IV-TR:
Manuel statistique et diagnostique des troubles mentaux, 4e éd., texte
rév, Paris, Masson, 2003, p. 808
[8] Organisation Mondiale de la Santé, Classification internationale des
maladies, Paris, Masson, 1994
[9] Aharon Barak, «The Judge in a Democracy», (2008) 56 The American
Journal of Comparative Law
[10] Ivan Zinger et A. E Forth, «Psychopathy and Canadian Criminal
Proceedings: The Potential for Human Rights Abuses», (1998) 40
Canadian Journal of Criminology
[11] Stephen Porter, Leanne ten Brinke et Kevin Wilson, «Crime profiles and
conditional release performance of psychopathic and non psychopathic
sexual offenders», (2009) 14 Legal and Criminological Psychology
[12] Erika Braithwaite, Examining the incremental validity of psychopathy
versus antisocial personnality disorder in understanding patterns of
criminal behavior, Département de Psychologie, Université de Montreal,
2010
[13] Laurent F. Friedman et Simon N. Verdun-Jones, «Blaming the Parts
Instead of the Person: understanding and Applying Neurobiological
Factors Associated with Psychopathy», (2010) 52 Canadian Journal of
Criminology and Criminal Justice
[14] Canadian criminal code, art. 753
[15] L. F. Friedman et S. N. Verdun-Jones, préc., note 18
[16] R. v. W.T.W., (1997) B.C.J. No. 3157 (BCPC) (QL)
[17] Jenny Laurell et Anna M. Daderman, «Recidivism is related to
psychopathy (PCL-R) in a group of men convicted of homicide», (2005)
28International journal of law and psychiatry
[18] Howard E. Barbaree, «Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and recidivism:
an extended follow-up of Seto and Barbaree», (2005) 20 Journal of
Interpersonal Violence
[19] L. F. Friedman et S. N. Verdun-Jones, préc., note 18
[20] Richard Dawkins, «Straf is wetenschappelijk achterhaald», (2006) NRCHandelsblad
[21] G. B. Palermo, «Psychopathy: Early and Recent Clinical Observations
and the Law», (2011) 55 International Journal of Offender Therapy and
Comparative Criminology
[22] Carl B. Gacono, James L. Loving, F. Barton Evans et Michael T. Jumes,
«The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: PCL-R Testimony and Forensic
Practice», (2002) 2 Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice
[23] Lisa G. Aspinwall, Teneille R. Brown et James Tabery, «The Double-
Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges'
Sentencing of Psychopaths?», (2012) 337 Science
[24] Adam Lamparello, «Using Cognitive Neuroscience to predict Future
Dangerousness», (2011) 42 Columbia Human rights law review
[25] Kimberly D. Phillips, «Empathy for psychopaths: Using fMRI Brains
Scans to Plea for Leniency in Death Penaltys Cases», (2013) 37 Law and
Psychology Review
[26] Adrian Raine, «From Genes to Brain to Antisocial Behavior», (2008)
17Current Directions in Psychological Science
[27] Robert James Blair, K. S. Pershardt, S. Budhani, D. G. Mitchell etD. S.
Pine, «The development of psychopathy», (2006) 47 Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry
[28] R. J. R. Blair, D. G. V. Mitchell, K. S. Peschardt, E. Colledge, R. A.
Leonard, J. H. Shine, L. K. Murray et D. I. Perrett, «Reduced sensitivity
to others’ fearful expressions in psychopathic individuals», (2004)
37Personality and Individual Differences.
[29] Robert James R. Blair, «The emergence of psychopathy: implications for
the neuropsychological approach to developmental disorders», (2006)
101Cognition.
[30] Robert James R. BLAIR, «The Cognitive Neuroscience of Psychopathy
and Implications for Judgments of Responsibility», (2008) 1 Neuroethics
[31] David De Matteo et John F. Edens, «The role and relevance of the
Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in Court: A case law survey of U.S.
Courts (1991-2004)», (2006) 12(2) Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
[32] Sarah Becker, A glimpse into the future? The Current, Potential, and
Appropriate Role of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Evidence as a predictor of Dangerousness in the American Criminal
Sentencing Context, Faculty of law, University of Toronto, 2013
[33] L.G. Aspinwall, T.R. Brown et J. Tabery, préc., note 31
[34] Hyman GROSS, A Theory of criminal justice, New York, Oxford Press
University, 1979
[35] Judith G. Edersheim, Rebecca Weintraub Brendel et Bruce H. Price,
«Neuroimaging, Diminished Capacity and Mitigation», dans
Neuroimaging in Forensic Psychiatry: From the Clinic to the
courtroom, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012, [36] L.G. Aspinwall, T.R. Brown et J. Tabery, préc., note 31
[37] Brett Walker, «When the Facts and the Law Are Against You, Argue the
Genes? : A pragmatic Analysis of Genotyping Mitigation Defendants in
Death Penalty Cases», (2013) 90 Washington University Law Review
[38] People v. Morgan (1999) 719 N.E.2d 681 (III.1999).
[39] Rogers v. State (2001) 783 So 2d 980 (Fla.2001).
[40] Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, art. 7
[41] Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, art. 12
[42] R. v. Bishop, 1993 ABCA 274