Proposal of Optimality Evaluation for Quantum Secure Communication Protocols by Taking the Average of the Main Protocol Parameters: Efficiency, Security and Practicality

In the field of quantum secure communication, there
is no evaluation that characterizes quantum secure communication
(QSC) protocols in a complete, general manner. The current paper
addresses the problem concerning the lack of such an evaluation
for QSC protocols by introducing an optimality evaluation, which
is expressed as the average over the three main parameters of QSC
protocols: efficiency, security, and practicality. For the efficiency
evaluation, the common expression of this parameter is used, which
incorporates all the classical and quantum resources (bits and qubits)
utilized for transferring a certain amount of information (bits) in a
secure manner. By using criteria approach whether or not certain
criteria are met, an expression for the practicality evaluation is
presented, which accounts for the complexity of the QSC practical
realization. Based on the error rates that the common quantum attacks
(Measurement and resend, Intercept and resend, probe attack, and
entanglement swapping attack) induce, the security evaluation for
a QSC protocol is proposed as the minimum function taken over
the error rates of the mentioned quantum attacks. For the sake of
clarity, an example is presented in order to show how the optimality
is calculated.

Authors:

• Georgi Bebrov
• Rozalina Dimova

Keywords:

• Quantum cryptography
• quantum secure communcation
• quantum secure direct communcation security
• quantum secure direct communcation efficiency
• quantum secure direct communcation practicality.

References:

[1] G. Long, F. Deng, C. Wang, X. Li, K. Wen, and W. Wang,
Quantum secure direct communication and deterministic secure quantum
communication, Front. Phys., 2, 25, Springer, 2007.
[2] C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Communication via One- and
Two-Particle Operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen States, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 69, 2881, American Physical Society, 1992.
[3] F. G. Deng, G. L. Long, and X. S. Liu, Two-step quantum direct
communication protocol using the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair block,
Phys. Rev. A, 68, 042317, American Physical Society, 2003.
[4] C. Wang, F. Deng, Y. Li, X. Liu, and G. Long, Quantum secure direct
communication with high-dimension quantum superdense coding, Phys.
Rev. A, 71, 044305, American Physical Society, 2005.
[5] F. G. Deng and G. L. Long, Secure direct communication with a quantum
one-time pad, Phys. Rev. A, 69, 052319, American Physical Society,
2004.
[6] A. Banerjee and A. Pathak, Maximally efficient protocols for direct
secure quantum communication, Phys. Lett. A, 376, 2944, Elsevier, 2012.
[7] C. W. Tsai, C. R. Hsieh, and T. Hwang, Dense coding using
cluster states and its application on deterministic secure quantum
communication, Eur. Phys. J. D, 61, 783, Springer, 2011.
[8] D. oy, S. Surendran, and M. Sabir, Efficient Deterministic Secure
Quantum Communication protocols using multipartite entangled states,
Quantum Inf Process, 16, 157, Springer, 2017.
[9] F. Yan and X. Zhang, A scheme for secure direct communication using
EPR pairs and teleportation, Euro. Phys. J. B, 41, 7578, Springer, 2004.
[10] A. Cabello, Quantum Key Distribution in the Holevo Limit, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 85, 5635, American Physical Society, 2000.
[11] Z. Cao, D. Song, J. Peng, C. He, and J. Feng, High Security Quantum
Secure Direct Communication Protocol Based on Three - particle GHZ
States, Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on
Nanotechnology, USA, pp. 40-43, 25-28 July 2017.