Discourse pronominal anaphora resolution must be part of any efficient information processing systems, since the reference of a pronoun is dependent on an antecedent located in the discourse. Contrary to knowledge-poor approaches, this paper shows that syntax-semantic relations are basic in pronominal anaphora resolution. The identification of quantified expressions to which pronouns can be anaphorically related provides further evidence that pronominal anaphora is based on domains of interpretation where asymmetric agreement holds.
[1] D. Carter, Interpreting Anaphora in Natural Language Texts,
Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1987.
[2] G. Chierchia, "Anaphora and dynamic binding," Linguistics and
Philosophyy, vol. 15, pp. 111-183, 1992.
[3] G. Chierchia, Dynamics of Meaning. Chicago: Chicago University Press,
1995.
[4] N. Chomsky, Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris,
1981.
[5] N. Chomsky, The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT
Press, 1995.
[6] N. Chomsky, "Minimalist inquiries," in Step by Step. Essays on
Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, R. Martin, D. Michaels
and J. Uriagereka, Eds. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2000, pp. 89-
155.
[7] N. Chomsky, "Derivation by phase", in Ken Hale: A Life in Language,
M. Kenstowicz, Ed. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2001.
[8] R. Cooper, "The interpretation of pronouns," in Syntax and Semantics,
F. Henry and H. Schnelle, Eds. New York: Academic Press, 1979,
pp. 61-92.
[9] A. M. Di Sciullo, "Morphological phases," in Proceedings of the 4th
GLOW in Asia 2003, Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective.
The Korean Generative Grammar Circle, H.-J. Yoon, Ed. 2003, pp. 113-
136.
[10] A. M. Di Sciullo, "Morphological relations in asymmetry theory," in
Asymmetry in Grammar, volume 2: Morphology, Phonology and
Acquisition A.M. Di Sciullo, Ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003, pp.
11-38.
[11] A.M. Di Sciullo, "Domains of argument structure asymmetries," in
Proceedings of the 7th Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and
Informatics (SCI 2005), N. Callaos, W. Lesso, K. Horimoto, Eds.
Orlando, Florida, pp. 316-320, 2005.
[12] A. M. Di Sciullo, Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: The
MIT Press, 2005.
[13] A. M. Di Sciullo, "Asymmetry theory in internet infrastructure," in
International Journal of Electronic Business, Vol 3: Special Issue on:
Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research in
Electronic Business, pp. 228-238, 2005.
[14] A. M. Di Sciullo and C. Aguero, "Natural language asymmetries and the
construction of question answering systems," in Proceedings of the 7th
Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics (SCI 2003),
vol. l.1, Information Systems. Technologies and Applications. N.
Callaos, A.M. Di Sciullo, T. Ohta and T.K. Liu, Eds. Orlando, Florida,
pp.13-18, 2003.
[15] G. Evans, "Pronouns," Linguistic Inquiry vol. 11, pp. 337-362. 1980.
[16] D. Fox, Economy and Scope Interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT
Press, 2000.
[17] J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof, "Dynamic Montague Grammar," in
Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, L. Kálmán
and L. P├│los, Eds. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiad├│, pp. 3-48, 1990.
[18] J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof, "Dynamic predicate logic," Linguistics
and Philodophy, vol. 14, pp. 39-100, 1990.
[19] K. Hale and J. Keyser, Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure.
Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2002.
[20] H. Heim, The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. University of
Massachusetts, Amherst Ph.D. dissertation. 1982.
[21] J. Hobbs, "Resolving pronouns reference", Lingua 44, pp. 339-352,
1987.
[22] R. Kayne, The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT
Press, 1994.
[23] H. Kemp, "A theory of truth and semantic representation," in Formal
Methods in the Study of Language, J. Groenendijk, J. Janssen, and M.
Stokhof, Eds. Mathematical Center, Amsterdam, 1981.
[24] C. Kennedy and B. Boguraev, "Anaphora for everyone: pronominal
anaphora resolution without a parser", Proceedings of the 16th
International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96),
Copenhagen, Denmark, 1996, pp. 113-118.
[25] S. Lappin and H. Leass, "An algorithm for pronominal anaphora
resolution". Computational Linguistics, vol. 4, pp. 535-561, 1994.
[26] R. May, Logical Form: Its Structure and Interpretation. Cambridge,
Mass.: The MIT Press, 1985.
[27] R. Mitkov, Anaphora Resolution, Edinburgh, London, Pearson
Education, 2002.
[28] A. Moro, Dynamic Antisymmetry, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press,
2000.
[29] E. Raimy, "Asymmetry and linearization in phonology," in Asymmetry
in Grammar. Volume 2: Morphology, Phonology and Acquisition. A. M.
Di Sciullo, Ed. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 129-146,
2003.
[30] C. Roberts, "Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in
discourse," Linguistic and Philosophy, vol. 12, pp. 683-721, 1986.
[31] J. Uriagereka, "Multiple spell-out," in Working Minimalism, S. D.
Epstein and M. Hornstein, Eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 251-
283, 1999.
[32] R. Wall, Introduction to Mathematical Linguistics, New Jersey: Prentice
Hall, 1972.
[1] D. Carter, Interpreting Anaphora in Natural Language Texts,
Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1987.
[2] G. Chierchia, "Anaphora and dynamic binding," Linguistics and
Philosophyy, vol. 15, pp. 111-183, 1992.
[3] G. Chierchia, Dynamics of Meaning. Chicago: Chicago University Press,
1995.
[4] N. Chomsky, Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris,
1981.
[5] N. Chomsky, The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT
Press, 1995.
[6] N. Chomsky, "Minimalist inquiries," in Step by Step. Essays on
Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, R. Martin, D. Michaels
and J. Uriagereka, Eds. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2000, pp. 89-
155.
[7] N. Chomsky, "Derivation by phase", in Ken Hale: A Life in Language,
M. Kenstowicz, Ed. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2001.
[8] R. Cooper, "The interpretation of pronouns," in Syntax and Semantics,
F. Henry and H. Schnelle, Eds. New York: Academic Press, 1979,
pp. 61-92.
[9] A. M. Di Sciullo, "Morphological phases," in Proceedings of the 4th
GLOW in Asia 2003, Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective.
The Korean Generative Grammar Circle, H.-J. Yoon, Ed. 2003, pp. 113-
136.
[10] A. M. Di Sciullo, "Morphological relations in asymmetry theory," in
Asymmetry in Grammar, volume 2: Morphology, Phonology and
Acquisition A.M. Di Sciullo, Ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003, pp.
11-38.
[11] A.M. Di Sciullo, "Domains of argument structure asymmetries," in
Proceedings of the 7th Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and
Informatics (SCI 2005), N. Callaos, W. Lesso, K. Horimoto, Eds.
Orlando, Florida, pp. 316-320, 2005.
[12] A. M. Di Sciullo, Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: The
MIT Press, 2005.
[13] A. M. Di Sciullo, "Asymmetry theory in internet infrastructure," in
International Journal of Electronic Business, Vol 3: Special Issue on:
Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research in
Electronic Business, pp. 228-238, 2005.
[14] A. M. Di Sciullo and C. Aguero, "Natural language asymmetries and the
construction of question answering systems," in Proceedings of the 7th
Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics (SCI 2003),
vol. l.1, Information Systems. Technologies and Applications. N.
Callaos, A.M. Di Sciullo, T. Ohta and T.K. Liu, Eds. Orlando, Florida,
pp.13-18, 2003.
[15] G. Evans, "Pronouns," Linguistic Inquiry vol. 11, pp. 337-362. 1980.
[16] D. Fox, Economy and Scope Interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT
Press, 2000.
[17] J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof, "Dynamic Montague Grammar," in
Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, L. Kálmán
and L. P├│los, Eds. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiad├│, pp. 3-48, 1990.
[18] J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof, "Dynamic predicate logic," Linguistics
and Philodophy, vol. 14, pp. 39-100, 1990.
[19] K. Hale and J. Keyser, Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure.
Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2002.
[20] H. Heim, The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. University of
Massachusetts, Amherst Ph.D. dissertation. 1982.
[21] J. Hobbs, "Resolving pronouns reference", Lingua 44, pp. 339-352,
1987.
[22] R. Kayne, The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT
Press, 1994.
[23] H. Kemp, "A theory of truth and semantic representation," in Formal
Methods in the Study of Language, J. Groenendijk, J. Janssen, and M.
Stokhof, Eds. Mathematical Center, Amsterdam, 1981.
[24] C. Kennedy and B. Boguraev, "Anaphora for everyone: pronominal
anaphora resolution without a parser", Proceedings of the 16th
International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96),
Copenhagen, Denmark, 1996, pp. 113-118.
[25] S. Lappin and H. Leass, "An algorithm for pronominal anaphora
resolution". Computational Linguistics, vol. 4, pp. 535-561, 1994.
[26] R. May, Logical Form: Its Structure and Interpretation. Cambridge,
Mass.: The MIT Press, 1985.
[27] R. Mitkov, Anaphora Resolution, Edinburgh, London, Pearson
Education, 2002.
[28] A. Moro, Dynamic Antisymmetry, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press,
2000.
[29] E. Raimy, "Asymmetry and linearization in phonology," in Asymmetry
in Grammar. Volume 2: Morphology, Phonology and Acquisition. A. M.
Di Sciullo, Ed. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 129-146,
2003.
[30] C. Roberts, "Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in
discourse," Linguistic and Philosophy, vol. 12, pp. 683-721, 1986.
[31] J. Uriagereka, "Multiple spell-out," in Working Minimalism, S. D.
Epstein and M. Hornstein, Eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 251-
283, 1999.
[32] R. Wall, Introduction to Mathematical Linguistics, New Jersey: Prentice
Hall, 1972.
@article{"International Journal of Information, Control and Computer Sciences:56872", author = "Anna Maria Di Sciullo", title = "Pronominal Anaphora Processing", abstract = "Discourse pronominal anaphora resolution must be part of any efficient information processing systems, since the reference of a pronoun is dependent on an antecedent located in the discourse. Contrary to knowledge-poor approaches, this paper shows that syntax-semantic relations are basic in pronominal anaphora resolution. The identification of quantified expressions to which pronouns can be anaphorically related provides further evidence that pronominal anaphora is based on domains of interpretation where asymmetric agreement holds.
", keywords = "asymmetric agreement, pronominal anaphora,
quantifiers and indefinite expressions.", volume = "1", number = "11", pages = "3521-6", }
