Principles of Sustainable and Affordable Housing Policy for Afghan Refugees Returning to Afghanistan

The overall goal of this paper is to examine the suitability and potential of the policies addressing the sustainability and affordability of housing for returnees, and to determine the impact of this policy on housing delivery for Afghan refugees. Housing is a central component of the settlement experience of refugees. A positive housing situation can facilitate many aspects of integration. Unaffordable, and unsafe housing, however, can cause disruptions in the entire settlement process. This paper aims to identify a suite of built forms for housing that is both affordable and environmentally sustainable for Afghan refugees. The result was the development of a framework that enables the assessment of the overall performance of various types of housing development in all zones of the country. There is very little evidence that the present approach of housing provision to the vagaries of market forces has provided affordable housing, especially for Afghan refugees. There is a need to incorporate social housing into the policy to assist people who cannot afford to have their own houses.

Authors:

• Mohammad Saraj Sharifzai
• Keisuke Kitagawa
• Mohammad Kamil Halimee
• Javid Habib
• Daishi Sakaguchi

Keywords:

• Afghan refugees
• housing policy
• affordability
• social housing
• housing provision
• environmental sustainability principles
• resettlement.

References:

[1] Samuel research and consulting company, Full report of the UNHCR
Shelter Assistance Programme 2013.
[2] D. Turton and P. Marsden, Taking Refugees for a Ride? The Politics of
Refugee Return to Afghanistan, Kabul, Afghanistan Research and
Evaluation Unit, 2002.
[3] Ashkenas, R., Ulrich D., Jick, T., Kerr., S. (1995) The Boundaryless
Organization: Breaking the Chains of Organizational Structure.
[4] DIAC (Department of Immigration and Citizenship). 2007b. Settlement
Database – Refugee and Hu- manitarian Entrants 1 July 2006 to 30 June
2007 by Local Government Area. Canberra: DIAC.
[5] Barakat, S. and Ellis, S. (eds.) (1996) Towards Improved Shelter and
Environment for Refugees and Displaced Persons within the
Post-Yugoslav Countries. University of Luton and IOASS, University of
York.
[6] Amisi, B. (2006) ‘An Exploration of the Livelihood Strategies of Durban
Congolese Refugees,’ UNHCR Working Paper No.123, New Issues in
Refugee Research, UNHCR, Geneva.
[7] Lohse, U., 2002. Housing finance-overview. In UN Habitat (Ed.),
Financing adequate shelter for all. UN Habitat, Nairobi: Addressing the
Housing Finance Problem in Development Countries. pp: 41-47.
[8] Beer, A., Kearins, B., Pieters, H. (2007) Housing Affordability and
Planning in Australia: The Challenge of Policy Under Neo-liberalism,
Housing Studies, vol. 22 (1), pp. 11-24.
[9] Berry, M. (2006) Housing affordability and the economy: A review of
macroeconomic
[10] Audenaert, A., De Clyen, S. H., Vankerckhove, B. (2008). Economic
analysis of passive houses and low-energy houses compared with
standard houses. Energy Policy.
[11] Krishan, A., Baker, N., Yannas, S., & Szokolay, S. V. (2001). Climate
Responsive Architectute: A design handbook for energy efficient
buildings. New Delhi: Tata Mcgraw-Hill.
[12] Al-Temeemi, A.S. (1995). Climatic design techniques for reducing
cooling energy consumption in Kuwaiti houses. Energy and Buildings,
[13] Bülow-Hübe, H. (2001). Energy-efficient window systems: Effects on
energy use and daylight in buildings.
[14] Bahadori, M.N. (1978). Passive cooling systems in Iranian architecture.
Scientific American.
[15] Ghobadian, V., Taghi, N. & Ghodsi, M.(2008). Tehran: A hot arid
climate. In Hyde, R. (Ed), Bioclimatic Housing: Innovative designs for
warm climates (pp.173-193). UK & USA: Earthscan