Preparation and Physical Assessment of Portland Cement Base Composites Containing Nano Particles

In this research the effects of adding silica and
alumina nanoparticles on flow ability and compressive strength of
cementitious composites based on Portland cement were investigated.
In the first stage, the rheological behavior of different samples
containing nanosilica, nanoalumina and polypropylene, polyvinyl
alcohol and polyethylene fibers were evaluated. With increasing of
nanoparticles in fresh samples, the slump flow diameter reduced.
Fibers reduced the flow ability of the samples and viscosity
increased. With increasing of the micro silica particles to cement
ratio from 2/1 to 2/2, the slump flow diameter increased. By adding
silica and alumina nanoparticles up to 3% and 2% respectively, the
compressive strength increased and after decreased. Samples
containing silica nanoparticles and fibers had the highest compressive
strength.


Authors:



References:
[1] Nazari, S. Riahi, Al2O3 nanoparticles in concrete and different curing
media, Energy and Buildings, 43, 2011, 1480-1488.
[2] B. W. Jo, C. H. Kim, G. H. Tae, and J. B. Park, Characteristics of
cement mortar with nano-SiO2 particles, Construction and Building
Materials, 21, 2007, 1351-1355.
[3] W. Y. Kuo, J. S. Huang, C. H. Lin, Effects of organo-modified
montmorillonite on strengths and permeability ofcement mortars,
Cement and Concrete Research, 36, 2006, 886 – 895.
[4] J. Chen, S. C. Kou, C. S. Poon, Hydration and properties of nano-TiO2
blended cement composites, Cement & Concrete Composites, 34, 2012,
642–649.
[5] L. Raki, J. Beaudoin, R. Alizadeh, J. Makar, T. Sato, Cement and
Concrete Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Materials, 3, 2010, 918-
942.
[6] D. Abdullah, T.R. Pitt Ford, S. Papaioannou, J. Nicholson, F.
McDonald, An evaluation of accelerated Portland cement as a
restorative material, Biomaterials, 23, 2002, 4001-4010.
[7] M.G. Gandolfi, F. Perut, G. Ciapetti, R. Mongiorgi, C. Prati, New
Portland Cement–based Materials for Endodontics Mixed with
Articaine Solution: A Study of Cellular Response, Journal of
Endodontics, 34, 2008, 39-44.
[8] A.L. Gomes Cornélio, L.P. Salles, M. Campos da Paz, J.A. Cirelli, J.M.
Guerreiro-Tanomaru, M. Tanomaru Filho, Cytotoxicity of Portland
Cement with Different Radiopacifying Agents: A Cell Death Study,
Journal of Endodontics, 37, 2011, 203-210.
[9] D.A. Ribeiro, M.A.H. Duarte, M.A. Matsumoto, M.E.A. Marques,
D.M.F. Salvadori, Biocompatibility In Vitro Tests of Mineral Trioxide
Aggregate and Regular and White Portland Cements, Journal of
Endodontics, 31 (2005) 605-607.
[10] S. Shahi, S. Rahimi, H.R. Yavari, H. Mokhtari, L. Roshangar, M.M.
Abasi, S. Sattari, M. Abdolrahimi, Effect of Mineral Trioxide
Aggregates and Portland Cements on Inflammatory Cells, Journal of
Endodontics, 36, 2010, 899-903.
[11] N. Wongkornchaowalit, V. Lertchirakarn, Setting Time and Flowability
of Accelerated Portland Cement Mixed with Polycarboxylate
Superplasticizer, Journal of Endodontics, 37, 2011, 387-389.
[12] M. D. Lepech, V. C. Li, Water permeability of engineered cementitious
composites, Cement & Concrete Composites, 31, 2009, 744-753.
[13] M. Şahmaran, V. C. Li, De-icing salt scaling resistance of mechanically
loaded engineeredcementitious composites, Cement and Concrete
Research, 37, 2007, 1035-1046.
[14] A. Spagnoli, A micromechanical lattice model to describe the fracture
behaviour ofengineered cementitious composites, Computational
Materials Science, 46, 2009, 7-14.
[15] C. Panganayi, H. Ogata, K. Hattori, Effect of plate thickness on crack
propagation characteristics of engineered cementitious composites,
Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 4, 2011, 542-547.