Peer Assessment in the Context of Project-Based Learning Online

The pedagogy project has been proven as an active learning method, which is used to develop learner-s skills and knowledge.The use of technology in the learning world, has filed several gaps in the implementation of teaching methods, and online evaluation of learners. However, the project methodology presents challenges in the assessment of learners online. Indeed, interoperability between E-learning platforms (LMS) is one of the major challenges of project-based learning assessment. Firstly, we have reviewed the characteristics of online assessment in the context of project-based teaching. We addressed the constraints encountered during the peer evaluation process. Our approach is to propose a meta-model, which will describe a language dedicated to the conception of peer assessment scenario in project-based learning. Then we illustrate our proposal by an instantiation of the meta-model through a business process in a scenario of collaborative assessment on line.




References:
[1] Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K.A. (1998). Active learning:
cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, Interaction book Co.
Minnesota
[2] Louise Capra, Lucie Arpin, Québec fran├ºais, n┬░ 126, 2002, p. 67-71.
« La médiation pédagogique de l-enseignant : une composante
essentielle dans l-apprentissage par projets ».BOUTINET, Jean-Pierre.
Psychologie des conduites de projet. Paris : PUF/Que sais-je ? 1993, 126
p
[3] Boud, D (1991) Implementing student self-assessment. Second, revised
edition. Sydney: HERDSA
[4] Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative
peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169.
[5] Topping, K. & Ehly, S. (1998), Peer assisted learning, Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[6] Loddington, Steve (May 2008) Peer assessment of group work: a review
of the literature, WebPA [16/12/11]:
http://webpaproject.lboro.ac.uk/files/WebPA_Literature%20review%20.
pdf
[7] Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(3), 289-300.
[8] Dochy. F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer
and co-assessment in higher education: a review. Studies in Higher
Education, 24(3), 331-350.
[9] Project-based learning approach for control system courses. Sba
Controle & Automação vol.23 no.1Campinas Jan./Feb.
2012.http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-7592012000100008
[10] Y. Miao, T. Sodhi,, F. Brouns, P. B. Sloep, R. Koper, Bridging the Gap
between Practitioners and Elearning Standards: A Domain-Specific
Modeling Approach. In P. Dillenbourg & M. Specht (Eds.), times of
Convergence. Technologies Across Learning Contexts - Proceedings of
the Third European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, ECTEL
2008. September, 16-19, 2008, Maastricht, The Netherlands,
(2008), 284-289.
[11] Miao, Y. & Koper, R. (2007). An Efficient and Flexible Technical
Approach to Develop and Deliver Online Peer Assessment. Clark A.
Chinn, G. Erkens, S. Puntambekar (Ed.) Mice, Minds, and Society,
Proceedings of the 7th Computer Supported Collaborative Learning
(CSCL 2007) conference, p. 502-511, July 16-21, 2007, New Jersey,
USA.