Paradigm and Paradox: Knowledge Management and Business Ethics

Knowledge management (KM) is generally considered to be a positive process in an organisation, facilitating opportunities to achieve competitive advantage via better quality information handling, compilation of expert know-how and rapid response to fluctuations in the business environment. The KM paradigm as portrayed in the literature informs the processes that can increase intangible assets so that corporate knowledge is preserved. However, in some instances, knowledge management exists in a universe of dynamic tension among the conflicting needs to respect privacy and intellectual property (IP), to guard against data theft, to protect national security and to stay within the laws. While the Knowledge Management literature focuses on the bright side of the paradigm, there is also a different side in which knowledge is distorted, suppressed or misappropriated due to personal or organisational motives (the paradox). This paper describes the ethical paradoxes that occur within the taxonomy and deontology of knowledge management and suggests that recognising both the promises and pitfalls of KM requires wisdom.

Authors:

• A. Evans
• M. McKinley

Keywords:

• business ethics
• data
• knowledge
• knowledgemanagement
• privacy
• protection.

References:

[1] Alter, S. (2006). Goals and Tactics on the Dark Side of Knowledge
Management. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference
on Systems Sciences.
[2] Argandona, A. (2003). The New Economy: Ethical Issues. Journal of
Business Ethics, 44:3-22.
[3] Baskerville, R. & Dulipovici, A. (2006). The Ethics of Knowledge
Transfers and Conversions: Property or Privacy Rights? Proceedings of
the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[4] Blodgett, J.G., Lu, L-C., Rose, G.M. & Vitell, S.J. (2001). Ethical
Sensitivity to Stakeholder Interests: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29 (2): 190-202
[5] Choi, S.Y., Kang, Y.S. & Lee, H. (2008). The effects of socio-technical
enablers on knowledge sharing: an exploratory examination. Journal of
Information Science, 34(5): 742-754.
[6] Gordon-Till, J. (2002). Applied ethics in business information units.
Business Information Review, 2: 48-54.
[7] Gupta, B., Lakshmi, S.I. & Aronson, J.E. (2000). Knowledge
Management: Practices and Challenges. Industrial Management & Data
Systems, 100(1):17-21.
[8] Harshman, C.L., Harshman, E.F. (2008). "The Gordian Knot of Ethics:
Understanding Leadership Effectiveness and Ethical Behavior" Journal
of Business Ethics, 78: 175-192.
[9] Land, F., Nolas, S-M., and Amjad, U. (2004). "Knowledge
Management: The Darker Side of Knowledge management."
ETHICOMP 2004.
[10] Land, F., Amjad, U. and Nolas, S-M. (2007). The Ethics of Knowledge
Management. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1):
1-9.
[11] Lang, J.C. (2001). Managerial concerns in knowledge management.
Journal of Knowledge management, 5(1): 43-57.
[12] Larrat, P., McKinley, M. (2004). "Competitive Intelligence in France:
Intentional or Incidental?" Conference on Emerging Issues in Business
and Technology.
[13] Lin, C-P. (2007). "To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit
Knowledge Sharing, its Mediators and Antecedents." Journal of
Business Ethics, 70:411-428
[14] Macdonald, J.E. & Beck-Dudley, C.L. (1994). Are Deontology and
Teleology Mutually Exclusive? Journal of Business Ethics, 13: 615-
623.
[15] Martensson, M. (2000). A critical review of knowledge management as
a management tool. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3):204-216.
[16] Martinet, B., Marti, Y-M. (2001). "L-Intelligence économique et
concurrentielle: les yeux et les oreilles de l-entreprise." 2nd edition,
Paris: Editions d-Organisations.
[17] McAllister, B. and Cripe, B. (2008). "Improper Release of Proprietary
Information." The CPA Journal, 78, 3: 52-55.
[18] McDermott, R. (1999). Why Information Technology Inspired But
Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management. California Management
Review, 42(4): 103-117.
[19] Rooney, D. & McKenna, B. (2007). Wisdom in Organisations: Whence
and Whither. Social Epistomology, 21 (2): 113-138.
[20] Rowley, J. (2006). Where is the wisdom that we have lost in
knowledge? Journal of Documentation, 62(2):251-270.
[21] Said, A., Bretones, D. (2009) "Economic Intelligence and Knowledge
Management. Two complementary facets of the same issue."
International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2(1): 1-26.
[22] Stanton, J.M. & Stam, K.R. (2003). Information Technology, Privacy,
and Power within Organisations: a view from Boundary Theory and
Social Exchange perspectives. Surveillance & Society, 1(2): 152-190.
[23] Styhre, A. (2002). The Knowledge-intensive Company and the
Economy of Sharing: Rethinking Utility and Knowledge Management.
Knowledge and Process Management, 9(4):228-236.
[24] The Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals. Online at
www.scip.org/ci/.
[25] Trethewey, A. & Corman, S. (2001). Anticipating K-Commerce.
Management Communication Quarterly, 14(4): 619-628.
[26] Wong, K.Y. (2005). Critical success factors for implementing
knowledge management in small and medium enterprises. Industrial
Management and Data Systems, 105(3): 261-279.
[27] Zack, M. (1999). "Managing Codified Knowledge." Sloan Management
Review, 40(4): 45-48.