On the Quality of Internet Users- Behavioral Patterns in Using Different Sites and Its Impact on Taboos of Marriage: A Survey among Undergraduate Students in Mashhad City in Iran

Regarding the multi-media property of internet and the facilities that can be provided for the users, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the users- behavioral patterns and the impact of internet on taboos of marriage. For this purpose a survey technique on the sample size amounted 403 students of governmental guidance schools of city of Mashhad in country of Iran were considered. The results showed, the process of using various internet environments depends on the degree of the users- familiarity with these sites. In order to clarify the effects of the Internet on the taboos of marriage, the non – internet parameters also considered to be controlled. The ttest held among the internet users and non-users, indicated that internet users possess lower taboos of marriage. Extraction of the effects of internet via considering the effects of non-internet parameters, indicate that addiction to the internet, creating a cordial atmosphere, emotional communication, and message attractive factors have significant effects on the family's traditional values.





References:
[1] Markey, P. M., Wells, S. M., & Markey, C. N. (2002). "Social and
personality psychology in the culture of cyberspace". In S. P. Shohov
(Ed.). Advances in psychology research (Vol. 9).
[2] Manasian, D. (2003). "Digital dilemmas: a survey of the Internet society.
Economist".
[3] www.Internetworldstats.com , June 30, 2007
[4] Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Keisler, S., & Scherlis, W.
(2000). "Information and communication: alternate uses of the Internet
in households". Information Systems Research.
[5] Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). "Relational communication in
computer-mediated interaction Human Communication Research", 19,
50┬▒88.
[6] Cornwell& D.C. Lundgren (2001), "Love on the Internet: involvement
and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. real
space" Computers in Human Behavior 17 (2001) 197┬▒211.
[7] Maheu, M. M., & Subotnik, R. B. (2001). "Infidelity on the Internet:
Virtual relationships and real betrayals". Naperville, IL: Source books.
[8] Keisler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). "Social psychological
aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist".
[9] Hatteld, E. (1988). Passionate and companionate love. In R. L.
Sternberg, & M. I. Barnes, The psychology of love (pp. 191┬▒217). New
Haven, CT: Yale University Pres.
[10] Levinger, G. (1988). "Can we picture ``love''? In R. J. Sternberg, & M.
L. Barnes, The psychology of love. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press.
[11] Borden, V. M. H., & Levinger, G. (1991). "Interpersonal transformations
in intimate relationships". In W.
[12] Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). "Attraction and close relationships.
In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey, The handbook of social
psychology" (Vol. II, pp. 193┬▒281). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
[13] McKenna, Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). "Plan from cyberspace: The
implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology".
Personality and Social Psychology Review.
[14] Kimberly M. Christopherson (2006)"The positive and negative
implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: On the Internet,
Nobody nows You-re a Dog-- .Department of Psychology, University of
North Dakota Grand Forks, Grand Forks,ND 58202-380,
[15] Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror. . . "The importance
of looks in everyday life". Albany: State University of New York Press.
[16] Haraway, D. (1990). "A manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology, and
socialist feminism in the 1908-s". In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.),
Feminism/postmodernism. London: Routledge.
[17] Poster, M. (1990). "The mode of Information: poststructuralism and
social context". Chicago: Polity.
[18] Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). "Connections: new ways of working in
the networked organization". Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[19] Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2002). "Behavior online: does anonymous
computer communication reduce gender inequality?" Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin.
[20] Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, B. N., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). "The
equalization phenomenon: status effect in computer-mediated and faceto-
face decision-making groups". Human-Computer Interaction.
[21] Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). "Group
processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational &
Human Decision Processes".
[22] Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or Panopticon? "The hidden
power in computer-mediated communication. Communication
Research", 21, 427-459.
[23] Thompson, G. (2003). "warblogs, the public sphere, and bubbles".
Transformations, 7. [On line] Available at:
http://transformations.cqu.edu.au/journal/issue_07/article_02.shtml
[24] Pusey,Michael, (1987)"Jorgen Habermas", translated in farsi by Ahmad
taddayon, published by hermes, Tehran
[25] Inglehart Ronld(1977), "The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and
Political Styles in Advanced Industrial Society"(Princeton, N.J.:
Princeton University Press, 1977).
[26] Turner H. janatan "The structure of sociological theory" 1986 forth
edition wad sworth publishing, company Belmont California.
[27] Atkinson rital, (1993), "introduction psychology", translated to persion
bye mohammad taghi baraheni and staff roshin, Tehran.