Numerical Studies on Flow Field Characteristics of Cavity Based Scramjet Combustors

The flow field within the combustor of scramjet
engine is very complex and poses a considerable challenge in the
design and development of a supersonic combustor with an optimized
geometry. In this paper comprehensive numerical studies on flow
field characteristics of different cavity based scramjet combustors
with transverse injection of hydrogen have been carried out for both
non-reacting and reacting flows. The numerical studies have been
carried out using a validated 2D unsteady, density based 1st-order
implicit k-omega turbulence model with multi-component finite rate
reacting species. The results show a wide variety of flow features
resulting from the interactions between the injector flows, shock
waves, boundary layers, and cavity flows. We conjectured that an
optimized cavity is a good choice to stabilize the flame in the
hypersonic flow, and it generates a recirculation zone in the scramjet
combustor. We comprehended that the cavity based scramjet
combustors having a bearing on the source of disturbance for the
transverse jet oscillation, fuel/air mixing enhancement, and flameholding
improvement. We concluded that cavity shape with
backward facing step and 45o forward ramp is a good choice to get
higher temperatures at the exit compared to other four models of
scramjet combustors considered in this study.





References:
<p>[1] J. Tamagno, and O. Lindemann, Experimental Results on Supersonic
Combustion, General Applied Science Laboratories, Ronkonkoma, NY,
December 1962.
[2] I. T. Osgerby, H. K. Smithson, and D. A. Wagner, &ldquo;Supersonic
combustion tests with a double-oblique-shock SCRAM jet in a shock
tunnel&rdquo;, AIAA J., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1703-1705, 1970.
[3] G. Y. Anderson, C. R. McClinton, and J. P. Weidner, &ldquo;Scramjet
performance&rdquo;, In: Scramjet Propulsion, E. T. Curran and S. N. B.Murthy
Eds., Reston, VA: AIAA Progress in Astronautics andAeronautics,
2000, vol. 189, pp. 369-446.
[4] D. C. Hunt, A. Paull, R. R. Boyce, and M. Hagenmaier, &ldquo;Investigation
of an axisymmetric scramjet configuration utilising inletinjection and
radical farming&rdquo;, in proceedings of 19th International Symposium on
Airbreathing Engines Montreal, Canada, September 2009.
[5] J. R. McGuire, R. R. Boyce, and N. R. Mudford, &ldquo;Radical farm ignition
processes in two-dimensional supersonic combustion&rdquo;, J. Propulsion
Power, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1248-1257, 2008.
[6] M. K. Smart, &ldquo;Scramjets&rdquo;, Aeronautical J., vol. 111, no. 1124, pp. 605-
620, 2007.
[7] M. K. Smart, and C. A. Trexler, &ldquo;Mach 4 Performance of hypersonic
inlet with rectangular-to-elliptical shape transition&rdquo;, J. Propulsion
Power, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 288-293, 2004.
[8] H. Ogawa1, R. R. Boyce1, A. Isaacs and T. Ray, &ldquo;Multi-Objective
Design Optimisation of Inlet and Combustor for Axisymmetric
Scramjets, The Open Thermodynamics Journal, 2010, 4, 86-91.
[9] Satish Kumar et al., &ldquo;Scramjet combustor development,&rdquo; Internal
Report, Hypersonic Propulsion Division, DRDL, India, 2005.
[10] C. McClinton, A. Roudakov, V. Semenov, V. Kopehenov, AIAA Paper
96-4571, 1996.
[11] T. Mathur, M. Gruber, K. Jackson, J. Donbar, W. Donaldson, T.
Jackson, F. Billig, J. Prop. Power 17 (6) (2001) 1305&ndash;1312.
[12] Jeong-Yeol Choi, Fuhua M, Vigor Yang, &ldquo;Combustion oscillations in a
scramjet engine combustor with transverse fuel injection,&rdquo; Proceedings
of the Combustion Institute 30 (2005) 2851&ndash;2858.
[13] J.Y. Choi, I.S. Jeung, Y. Yoon, AIAA J. 38 (7) (2000) 1179&ndash;1187.
[14] A. Paull, R. J. Stalker and D. J. Mee, &ldquo;Experiments on supersonic
combustion ramjet propulsion in a shock tunnel&rdquo;, J. Fluid Mech., vol.
296, pp. 159-183, 1995.
[15] R. J. Stalker, A. Paull, D. J. Mee, R. G. Morgan, and P. A.
Jacobs,&ldquo;Scramjets and shock tunnels &ndash; The Queensland experience&rdquo;,
Prog Aerosp Sci., vol. 41, pp. 471-513, 2005.</p>