Low Cost Technique for Measuring Luminance in Biological Systems

In this work, the relationship between the melanin content in a tissue and subsequent absorption of light through that tissue was determined using a digital camera. This technique proved to be simple, cost effective, efficient and reliable. Tissue phantom samples were created using milk and soy sauce to simulate the optical properties of melanin content in human tissue. Increasing the concentration of soy sauce in the milk correlated to an increase in melanin content of an individual. Two methods were employed to measure the light transmitted through the sample. The first was direct measurement of the transmitted intensity using a conventional lux meter. The second method involved correctly calibrating an ordinary digital camera and using image analysis software to calculate the transmitted intensity through the phantom. The results from these methods were then graphically compared to the theoretical relationship between the intensity of transmitted light and the concentration of absorbers in the sample. Conclusions were then drawn about the effectiveness and efficiency of these low cost methods.

Authors:

• N. Chetty
• K. Singh

Keywords:

• Tissue phantoms
• scattering coefficient
• albedo
• low-cost method.

References:

[1] Hutchison AM, Beard DJ, Bishop J, Pallister I, Davies W. An Investigation of the Transmission and Attenuation of Intense Pulsed Light on Samples of Human Achilles Tendon and Surrounding Tissue. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2012; 44:397–405.
[2] Baranoski GVG, Krishnaswamy A. An Introduction to Light Interaction with Human Skin. RITA. 2004.
[3] Taylor EF. Illumination Fundamentals. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. 2000.
[4] Kim A, Keller JB. Light Propagation in Biological Tissue. Departments of Mathematics and Mechanical Engineering Stanford University, USA.
[5] Sviridov A, Hassan VCM, Russo A, et al. Intensity Profiles of Linearly Polarized Light Backscattered from Skin and Tissue-like Phantoms. Journal of Biomedical Optics 10(1). 2005.
[6] Ghosh S, Soni J, Purwar H, Jagtap J, Pradhan A, Ghosh N, et al. Differing Self-similarity in Light Scattering Spectra: A Potential Tool for Pre-cancer Detection. Optical Society of America. 2011.
[7] Jacques SL, Ramella-Roman JC, Lee K. Imaging Skin Pathology with Polarized Light. Journal of Biomedical Optics 7(3). 2002
[8] Hiscocks PD. Measuring Luminance with a Digital Camera. Syscomp Electronic Design Limited. 2011.
[9] Pharmaxchange. Available online from http://pharmaxchange.info/press/2012/04/ultraviolet-visible-uv-vis-spectroscopy-%E2%80%93-derivation-of-beer-lambert-law/. Accessed 10 March 2016.
[10] College of Life Science, National Tsing Hua University; Available online from http://life.nthu.edu.tw/~labcjw/BioPhyChem/Spectroscopy/beerslaw.htm
[11] Wüller D, Gabele H. The Usage of Digital Cameras as Luminance Meters. SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging. 2007
[12] O’ Doherty J, Henricson J, Anderson C, Leahy MJ, Nilsson GE, Sjöberg F. Sub-Epidermal Imaging using Polarized Light Spectroscopy for Assessment of Skin Microcirculation. Skin Technology and Research. 2007; 13;472 - 484.
[13] Tuchin VV. Tissue Optics: Light Scattering Methods and Instruments for Medical Diagnosis. 2nd ed. Bellingham: SPIE; 2007.