Knowledge Creation and Innovation in Classroom

The concepts of knowledge creation and innovation have a strong relationship but this relationship has not been examined systematically. This study examines the utilization of knowledge creation processes of the Theory of Knowledge Creation in Higher Education Institutions. These processes consist of socialization, externalization, combination and internalization. This study suggests that the utilization of these processes will give impacts on innovation in academic performance. A cross-sectional study was conducted using survey questionnaires to collect data of the utilization of knowledge creation processes and classroom-s innovation. The samples are Business Management students of a Malaysian Higher Education Institution. The results of this study could help Higher Education Institutions to enrich the learning process of students through knowledge creation and innovation.




References:
[1] A. Asllani, F. Luthans, "What knowledge managers really do: an
empirical and comparative analysis," Journal of Knowledge
Management,, vol. 7, no. 3, pp.53-66, 2003.
[2] R.G. Best, S.J. Hysong, C. Mc Ghee, F.I. Moore, & J.A. Pugh, (2002,
Fall-Winter). An empirical test of Nonaka-s Theory of Knowledge
Creation. E-journal of Organizational Learning and Leadership, 2 (2).
Available: http://www.weleadinlearning.org/rboct03.htm
[3] D. Chalmers (2000). Managing, Teaching and Assessing Large Classes.
Available: www.griffith.edu.au
[4] J. Chen, I. I-Shuo Chen, "Select innovative indices of higher educational
institutions by FAHP". Journal of American Academy of Business,
Cambridge, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 151, 2008.
[5] K. Collin and P. Tynjälä, "Integrating theory and practice? employees-
and students- experiences of learning at work", Journal of Workplace
Learning, vol. 15:7/8, pp. 338-344, 2003.
[6] W. H. A Johnson, & D.A. Johnston, "Organizational knowledge creating
processes and the performance of university-industry collaborative R&D
projects", International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 27, no
1, pp. 93-114, 2004.
[7] H. Lee & B. Choi, "Knowledge management enablers, processes, and
organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical
examination", Journal of Management Information Systems, pp. 20, no
1, pp 179-228, 2003.
[8] P. Maki (2002). Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn about Student
Learning. Available: www.aahe.org/Assessment/assessmentplan.htm.
[9] Malaysian Qualification Agency (2007). Available:
http://www.lan.gov.my
[10] W. Michael, "A case study of the fidelity approach in an educational
innovation," The International Journal of Educational Management, vol.
18, no 1, pp. 49-57, 2004.
[11] R.J. Murnane & R.R. Nelson, "Production and innovation when
techniques are tacit: the case of education", Journal of Economic
Behavior and Organization, vol. 5, pp. 353-373, 1984.
[12] National Center for Postsecondary Improvement (2008). Available:
http://ncpi.stanford.edu
[13] I. Nonaka, "A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation",
Organization Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14-37, 1994.
[14] D. O-Sullivan, "Online project based learning in innovation
management, Education & Training, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 110-117, 2003.
[15] T. Powell, "Total quality management as competitive advantage: a
review and empirical study", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 16, pp.
15-37, 1995.
[16] I. F. Rockman, "The importance of assessment", Reference Services
Review, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 181-182, 2002.
[17] J. Rowley, "Is higher education ready for knowledge management?, The
International Journal of Education Management, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 325-
333, 2000.
[18] E. A. Smith, "Applying knowledge-enabling methods in the classroom
and in the workplace" Journal of Workplace Learning, vol. 12, no. 6, pp.
236-244, 2000.
[19] S.R. Yen & M.H. Chang, "A case study of innovation management at
schools: contents and program," Journal of Mediate Education, vol. 56,
no. 3, pp. 28-52, 2005.