Investigation of Flame and Soot Propagation in Non-Air Conditioned Railway Locomotives

Propagation of fire through a non-air conditioned
railway compartment is studied by virtue of numerical simulations.
Simultaneous computational fire dynamics equations, such as
Navier-Stokes, lumped species continuity, overall mass and energy
conservation, and heat transfer are solved using finite volume based
(for radiation) and finite difference based (for all other equations)
solver, Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS). A single coupe with an eight
berth occupancy is used to establish the numerical model, followed
by the selection of a three coupe system as the fundamental unit
of the locomotive compartment. Heat Release Rate Per Unit Area
(HRRPUA) of the initial fire is varied to consider a wide range of
compartmental fires. Parameters, such as air inlet velocity relative
to the locomotive at the windows, the level of interaction with the
ambiance and closure of middle berth are studied through a wide
range of numerical simulations. Almost all the loss of lives and
properties due to fire breakout can be attributed to the direct or
indirect exposure to flames or to the inhalation of toxic gases and
resultant suffocation due to smoke and soot. Therefore, the temporal
stature of fire and smoke are reported for each of the considered
cases which can be used in the present or extended form to develop
guidelines to be followed in case of a fire breakout.




References:
[1] N. Markatos, M. Malin, and G. Cox, “Mathematical modelling of
buoyancy-induced smoke flow in enclosures,” International Journal of
Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 63–75, 1982.
[2] A. Yuen, G. Yeoh, R. Alexander, and M. Cook, “Fire scene
reconstruction of a furnished compartment room in a house fire,” Case
Studies in Fire Safety, vol. 1, pp. 29–35, 2014.
[3] S. Vatsal and D. Arup Kumar, “Building fire safety: Numerical
simulation and evacuation planning,” in International Conference of the
International Building Performance Simulation Association, Hyderabad,
India, December 7-9, 2015, vol. 14. IBPSA, 2016, pp. 897–904.
[4] S.-J. MO, Z.-R. Li, D. Liang, J.-X. Li, and N.-j. Zhou, “Analysis of
smoke hazard in train compartment fire accidents base on fds,” Procedia
Engineering, vol. 52, pp. 284–289, 2013.
[5] A. Enbaya, T. Asim, R. Mishra, and R. B. Rao, “Fire safety analysis of a
railway compartment using computational fluid dynamics,” International
Journal of COMADEM, 2015.
[6] W.-K. Chow, K. Lam, N. Fong, S. Li, and Y. Gao, “Numerical
simulations for a typical train fire in china,” Modelling and Simulation
in Engineering, vol. 2011, p. 4, 2011.
[7] N. White, “Fire development in passenger trains,” Ph.D. dissertation,
Victoria University, 2010.
[8] J. S. Roh, H. S. Ryou, W. H. Park, and Y. J. Jang, “Cfd simulation
and assessment of life safety in a subway train fire,” Tunnelling and
Underground Space Technology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 447–453, 2009.
[9] R. D. Peacock, P. A. Reneke, W. W. Jones, R. W. Bukowski,
and V. Babrauskas, “Concepts for fire protection of passenger rail
transportation vehicles: past, present, and future,” Fire and Materials,
vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 71–87, 1995.
[10] H.-T. Chen and S.-K. Lee, “Estimation of heat-transfer characteristics
on the hot surface of glass pane with down-flowing water film,” Building
and environment, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2089–2099, 2010.
[11] K. McGrattan, S. Hostikka, J. Floyd, H. Baum, R. Rehm, W. Mell, and
R. McDermott, “Fire dynamics simulator (version 5), technical reference
guide,” NIST special publication, vol. 1018, no. 5, 2004.
[12] K. B. McGrattan and G. P. Forney, Fire Dynamics Simulator: User’s
Manual. US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration,
National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2000.