Improving E-Government Services for Non- English Speaking Background (NESB) Communities in Australia

Australian government agencies have a natural desire to provide migrants a wide range of opportunities. Consequently, government online services should be equally available to migrants with a non-English speaking background (NESB). Despite the commendable efforts of governments and local agencies in Australia to provide such services, in reality, many NESB communities are not taking advantage of these services. This article–based on an extensive case study regarding the use of online government services by the Arabic NESB community in Australia–reports on the possible reasons for this issue, as well as suggestions for improvement. The conclusion is that Australia should implement ICT-based or e-government policies, programmes, and services that more accurately reflect migrant cultures and languages so that migrant integration can be more fully accomplished. Specifically, this article presents an NESB Model that adopts the value of usercentricity or a more individual-focused approach to government online services in Australia.

Authors:

• M. Mohammad
• Y-C Lan

Keywords:

• Barriers to use
• e-government
• ICT
• NESB community
• online services.

References:

[1] Cao, G. 2010. A four-dimensional view of IT business value. Systems
research and behavioural science 27(3): 267-284.
[2] Muscatello, J.R. & Chen, I.J. 2008. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
Implementations: Theory and Practice. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI
Publishing.
[3] Sharma, R. & Yetton, P. 2007. The contingent effects of training,
technical complexity, and task interdependence on successful
information systems implementation. MIS Quarterly 31, 219-238.
[4] Zhang, N., Guo, X., Chen, G. & Chau, P. Y. K. 2008. Impact of
perceived fit on e-government user evaluation: a study with a Chinese
cultural context. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
[5] Chen, R., Sun, C., Helms, M.M. & Jih, W. 2009. Factors Influencing
Information System Flexibility: An Interpretive Flexibility Perspective.
Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Publishing.
[6] Salazar Alvarez, A.J. 2003. Towards an Interpretive Integrative
Framework to Conceptualise Social Processes in Large Information
Systems Implementations. Information Technology for Development, 10:
233-247.
[7] Shoib, G. & Nandhakumar, J. 2003. Cross-cultural IS Adoption in
Multinational Corporations: A Study of Rationality. Information
Technology for Development, 10: 249-260.
[8] Rao, S.K. & Gupta, D.K. 2011. Fostering E-government as State Social
Responsibility. In Parycek, P., Kripp, M.J. & Edelman, N. (eds.)
Proceedings of the International Conference for E-democracy and Open
Government, 235-248.
[9] Australian Government Data Center Strategy: 2010-2025. 2010.
OnlineÔÇöwebsite is available at:
<http://agimo.govspace.gov.au/files/2010/12/Industry-Briefing-Data-
Centre-Strategy.pdf>.
[10] Bruns, A. & Wilson, J. 2009. Citixen Communication from Above and
Below: The Australian Perspective. In A. Prosser & P. Parycek (eds.)
EDem 2009. Austrian Computer Society, Vienna.
[11] Colesca, S.E. & Dobrica, L. 2008. Adoption and Use of E-government
Services: The Case of Romania. Journal of Applied Research and
Technology, 6(3): 204-217.
[12] Das, J., DiRienzo, C. & Burbridge, J. 2008. Global E-government and
the Role of Trust: A Cross Country Analysis. International Journal of
Electronic Government Research, 5(1): 1-18.
[13] Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO).
2011. Australians- use and satisfaction with e-government services.
Department of Finance and Deregulation, Government of Australia.
[14] Chan, C. M. L., Hackney, R., Pan, S. L. & Chou, T-C. 2011. Managing
e-Government system implementation: a resource enactment
perspective. European Journal of Information Systems 20: 529-541.
[15] Irani, Z., Love, P.E.D. & Montazemi, A. 2007. e-Government: past,
present and future. European Journal of Information Systems, 16: 103-
105.
[16] Budde, P. 2011. Australia - E-health, e-education, e-government.
[online] Available at: <http://www.budde.com.au/Research/>
[17] Martin, N. & Rice, J. 2011. Evaluating and designing electronic
government for the future: observations and insights from Australia.
International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 7(3): 38-56.
[18] Saha, P. 2010. Understanding the Impact of Enterprise Architecture on
Connected Government. NUS Institute of Systems Science.
[19] Sawrikar, P., & Katz, I. 2008. Enhancing family and relationship service
accessibility and delivery to culturally and linguistically diverse families
in Australia. AFRC Issues 3, 1-20.
[20] Tan, C-W, Benbasat, I & Cenfetelli, R. 2010. Understanding the
Antecedents and Consequences of E-Government Service Quality:
Transactional Frequency as a Moderator of Citizens- Quality
Perceptions. 18th European Conference on Information Systems.
[21] Baumgarten, J. & Chui, M. 2009. E-Government 2.0. McKinsey on
Government, 4: 26-31.
[22] Arkoudis, S. Hawthorne, L. Baik, C. Hawthorne, G., O-Loughlin, K.,
Leach, D. & Bexley, E. 2009. The impact of English language
proficiency and workplace readiness on the employment outcomes of
tertiary international students. Department of Education, Employment
and Workplace Relations. April 2009.
[23] Masrek, M. N., Noordin, S. A., Anwar, N., & Idris, A. S. A. (2011). The
Relationship between Cultural Identity and Individual Knowledge
Sharing Behavior. IBIMA Business Review 2011, 1-14.
[24] Australian Government (Commonwealth of Australia) Department of
Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (2011).
Government: lays the foundations for Australia's digital infrastructure
Australia's digital economy: future directions. [online] Available
at: <http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/whatisthe_digital_econo
my/australias_digital_economy_future_directions/final_report/>
[25] Gottchalk, P. 1999. Strategic Information Systems Planning: The IT
Strategy Implementation Matrix. European Journal of
Information Systems, 8: 107-118.
[26] Hreno, J., Bednár, P., Furdík, K. & Sabol, T. 2011. Integration of
government services using semantic technologies. Journal of
Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 143-154.
[27] Kubicek, H. & Cimander, R. 2009. Three Dimensions of Organizational
Interoperability. Insights from Recent Studies for Improving
Interoperability Frame-Works. European Journal of ePractice, 6.
[28] Furd├¡k, K., Tom├í┼íek, M. & Hreňo, J. 2011. A WSMO-based Framework
Enabling Semantic Interoperability in e-Government Solutions. Acta
Polytechnica Hungarica, 8(2), 61-79.
[29] Skokan, M., Bednar, P. 2008. Semantic Orchestration of Services in
eGovernment. In: Proceedings of Znalosti (Knowledge). STU Bratislava,
Slovakia, 215-223.