Improving Detection of Illegitimate Scores and Assessment in Most Advantageous Tenders
Adopting Most Advantageous Tender (MAT) for the
government procurement projects has become popular in Taiwan. As
time pass by, the problems of MAT has appeared gradually. People
condemn two points that are the result might be manipulated by a
single committee member’s partiality and how to make a fair decision
when the winner has two or more. Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem
proposed that the best scoring method should meet the four reasonable
criteria. According to these four criteria this paper constructed an
“Illegitimate Scores Checking Scheme” for a scoring method and used
the scheme to find out the illegitimate of the current evaluation method
of MAT. This paper also proposed a new scoring method that is called
the “Standardizing Overall Evaluated Score Method”. This method
makes each committee member’s influence tend to be identical. Thus,
the committee members can scoring freely according to their partiality
without losing the fairness. Finally, it was examined by a large-scale
simulation, and the experiment revealed that the it improved the
problem of dictatorship and perfectly avoided the situation of cyclical
majorities, simultaneously. This result verified that the Standardizing
Overall Evaluated Score Method is better than any current evaluation
method of MAT.
[1] Wen-Hung Yang, “A Research on Constructing the Fault Checking
Scheme and Improving Way for Scoring Method of the Most Advantageous Tender”, Masters dissertation, Department of Civil
Engineering, National Ilan University, 2008.
[2] Wen-Lin Tzeng, John Chien-Chung Li, Tzu-Ying Chang. “A study on the
effectiveness of the most advantageous tendering method in the public
works of Taiwan,” International Journal of Project Management, vol.24,
pp.431–437, 2006.
[3] Ting-Ya Hsieh, Shih-Tong Lu b, Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, “Fuzzy MCDM
approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office
buildings”, International Journal of Project Management, vol.22,
pp.573–584, 2004.
[4] Lung-Chuang Wang, Nelson Chou, “The review of the vendor selection
system”, Construction News Record, vol.279, pp.70-72, 2006.
[5] Sidhartha S. Padhi, Pratap K.J. Mohapatra, “Centralized bid evaluation
for awarding of construction projects – A case of India government”,
International Journal of Project Management, vol.28, pp.275–284, 2010.
[6] Arrow, Kenneth Joseph, Social Choice and Individual Value 2nd ed.,
Wiley, 1963.
[7] Mueller, Dennis C. Public Choice II, Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press, 1989.
[1] Wen-Hung Yang, “A Research on Constructing the Fault Checking
Scheme and Improving Way for Scoring Method of the Most Advantageous Tender”, Masters dissertation, Department of Civil
Engineering, National Ilan University, 2008.
[2] Wen-Lin Tzeng, John Chien-Chung Li, Tzu-Ying Chang. “A study on the
effectiveness of the most advantageous tendering method in the public
works of Taiwan,” International Journal of Project Management, vol.24,
pp.431–437, 2006.
[3] Ting-Ya Hsieh, Shih-Tong Lu b, Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, “Fuzzy MCDM
approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office
buildings”, International Journal of Project Management, vol.22,
pp.573–584, 2004.
[4] Lung-Chuang Wang, Nelson Chou, “The review of the vendor selection
system”, Construction News Record, vol.279, pp.70-72, 2006.
[5] Sidhartha S. Padhi, Pratap K.J. Mohapatra, “Centralized bid evaluation
for awarding of construction projects – A case of India government”,
International Journal of Project Management, vol.28, pp.275–284, 2010.
[6] Arrow, Kenneth Joseph, Social Choice and Individual Value 2nd ed.,
Wiley, 1963.
[7] Mueller, Dennis C. Public Choice II, Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press, 1989.
@article{"International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences:70349", author = "Hao-Hsi Tseng and Hsin-Yun Lee", title = "Improving Detection of Illegitimate Scores and Assessment in Most Advantageous Tenders", abstract = "Adopting Most Advantageous Tender (MAT) for the
government procurement projects has become popular in Taiwan. As
time pass by, the problems of MAT has appeared gradually. People
condemn two points that are the result might be manipulated by a
single committee member’s partiality and how to make a fair decision
when the winner has two or more. Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem
proposed that the best scoring method should meet the four reasonable
criteria. According to these four criteria this paper constructed an
“Illegitimate Scores Checking Scheme” for a scoring method and used
the scheme to find out the illegitimate of the current evaluation method
of MAT. This paper also proposed a new scoring method that is called
the “Standardizing Overall Evaluated Score Method”. This method
makes each committee member’s influence tend to be identical. Thus,
the committee members can scoring freely according to their partiality
without losing the fairness. Finally, it was examined by a large-scale
simulation, and the experiment revealed that the it improved the
problem of dictatorship and perfectly avoided the situation of cyclical
majorities, simultaneously. This result verified that the Standardizing
Overall Evaluated Score Method is better than any current evaluation
method of MAT.", keywords = "Arrow’s impossibility theorem, most advantageous
tender, illegitimate scores checking scheme, standard score.", volume = "9", number = "7", pages = "2354-5", }