Faculty-Industry R&D Joint Ventures: Barriers VS Incentives for Developing Nations

The aspiration of this research article is to target and focus the gains of university-Industry (U-I) collaborations and exploring those hurdles which are the obstacles for attaining these gains. University-Industry collaborations have attained great importance since 1980 in USA due to its application in all fields of life. U-I collaboration is a bilateral process where academia is a proactive member to make such alliances. Universities want to ameliorate their academic-base with the technicalities of technobabbles. U-I collaboration is becoming an essential lane for achieving innovative goals in this century. Many developed nations have set successful examples to prove this phenomenon as a catalyst to reduce costs, efforts and personnel for R&D projects. This study is exploits amplitudes of UI collaboration incentives in the light of success stories of developed countries. Many universities in USA, UK, Canada and various European Countries have been engaged with enterprises for numerous collaborative agreements. A long list of strategic and short term R&D projects has been executed in developed countries to accomplish their intended purposes. Due to the lack of intentions, genuine research and research-oriented environment, the mentioned field could not grow very well in developing countries. During last decade, a new wave of research has induced the institutes of developing countries to promote R&D culture especially in Pakistan. Higher Education Commission (HEC) has initiated many projects and funding supports for universities which have collaborative intentions with industry. Findings show that rapid innovation, overwhelm the technological complexities and articulated intellectual-base are major incentives which steer both partners to establish faculty-industry alliances. Everchanging technologies, concerned about intellectual property, different research environment and culture, research relevancy (Basic or applied), exposure differences and diversity of knowledge (bookish or practical) are main barriers to establish and retain joint ventures. Findings also concluded that, it is dire need to support and enhance cooperation among academia and industry to promote highly coordinated research behaviors. Author has proposed a roadmap for developing countries to promote R&D clusters among faculty and industry to deal the technological challenges and innovation complexities. Based on our research findings, Model for R&D Collaboration for developing countries also have been proposed to promote articulated R&D environment. If developing countries follow this phenomenon, rapid innovations can be achieved with limited R&D budget heads.

Authors:

• Muhammad Fiaz
• Baseerat Rizwan
• Naqvi Najam Abbas
• Yang Naiding

Keywords:

• University-Industry Collaboration
• Academia
• Innovation
• R&D Barriers

References:

[1] Johan Bruneela,b, Pablo D-Esteb, Ammon Salter a ,2010, "Investigating
the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry
collaboration", Research Policy 39, 858-868
[2] von Hippel, E., von Krogh, G., 2003. Open source software and the
"Private- Collective" innovation model. Organization Science 14, 208-
223.
[3] Geuna, A., Steinmeuller, W., Salter, A.J. (Eds.), 2003. Science and
Innovation: Changing Rationales for the Public Funding of Research.
Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
[4] Rosenberg, N., 2002. America-s University/Industry Interfaces 1945-
2000. Working paper, Department of Economics, Stanford University.
[5] Yong S. Lee, 2000, "The Sustainability of University-Industry Research
Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment ", Journal of Technology
Transfer, 25: 111-133
[6] Brown, J.S., Duguid, P., 2000. The Social Life of Information. Harvard
Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
[7] Bishop, K., D-Este, P., Neely, A., 2011. Gaining from interactions with
universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity.
Research Policy, 40, 1, pp. 30-40.
[8] Hall, B.H., Link, A.N., Scott, J.T., 2003. Universities as research
partners. Review of Economics and Statistics 85, 485-491.
[9] Hertzfeld, H.R., Link, A.N., Vonortas, N.S., 2006. Intellectual property
protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy 35,
825-838.
[10] Gunasekara, A.. 2006, "Reafirming the role of universities in the
development of regional innovation systems", Journal of Technology
Transfer, 31, 101-113.
[11] Abramo, G., D-Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F., 2011,"University-
industry research collaboration. A model to assess university
capability", Higher Education, 62(2), 163-181.
[12] Nissani, M. (1997), Ten cheers for interdisciplinary: The case for
interdisciplinary knowledge and research. Social Science Journal, 34, 2,
201-216
[13] Teece, D. (2000), Managing Intellectual Capital, New York: Oxford
University Press
[14] Chesbrough, H. (2003), The logic of open innovation: Managing
intellectual property, California Management Review. 2003. 45 (3): 33-
58.
[15] Hall, B.H., Link, A.N. and Scott, J.T. (2001), Barriers inhibiting
industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from the advanced
technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 1-2, 87-97.
[16] Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new
perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 35, 1, 128-152.
[17] Van Dierdonck, R. and Debackere, K. (1988), Academic
entrepreneurship at Belgian Universities. R&D Management, 18, 4,
341-353.
[18] USA National Science Board, 2008
[19] Roberto Fontana, Aldo Geunab, Mireille Matt (2006), Factors affecting
university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching,
screening and signaling, Research Policy Vol. 35(2006), Page 309-323
[20] Hong, W., (2006), Technology transfer in Chinese universities: is ÔÇÿmode
2- sufficient for a developing country? In: New Technologies in Global
Societies. World Scientific Publishers, New Jersey, pp.21-50
[21] Bruhn, J.G. (1995), Beyond discipline: Creating a culture for
interdisciplinary research. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral
Science , 30, 4, 331-341.
[22] Cyert, R.M. and Goodman, P.S. (1997), Creating effective universityindustry
alliances: An organizational learning perspective.
Organizational Dynamics , 25, 4, 45-57.
[23] Pavitt, K. (1998), The social shaping of the national science base.
Research Policy, 27, 8, 793- 805.
[24] Lopez-Martinez, R.E, Medellin, E., Scanlon, A.P. and Solleiro, J.L.
(1994), Motivations and obstacles to university industry cooperation
(UIC): A Mexican case. R&D Management, 24,1, 17-31
[25] Dasgupta, P. and P. David, 1994, Towards a New Economics of
Science, Research Policy 23, 487-522.
[26] Robert W. Gracy (2011), " Enhancing International Research
Collaborations: A University Perspective" Asia Pacific Research
Executive Forum 2011,Strategic Collaboration to further strengthen
Universities in Asia Pacific, June 8th, 2011
[27] Lindholm Dahlstrand, A. (1999), Technology-based SMEs in the
Göteborg region: Their origin and interaction with universities and large
firms. Regional Studies, 33, 4, 379-389.
[28] Behrens, T.R. and Gray, D.O. (2001), Unintended consequences of
cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship of climate for
academic freedom and other graduate student outcome. Research Policy,
30, 2, 179-199.
[29] Veugelers, R., Cassiman, B., 2005. R&D cooperation between firms and
universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing.
International Journal of Industrial Organization 23, 355-379.
[30] Allen, J.T., 1984. Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology
Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the
R&D Organization. MIT, Press, Cambridge (MA).
[31] von Hippel, E., 1987. Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how
trading. Research Policy 16, 291-302.
[32] Durrani, T.S. and Forbes, S.M. (2004) The three-legged stool : new
modes of university-industry-government collaboration. In: 13th
International Conference on Management of Technology, 2004-04-03 -
2004-04-07, Washington
[33] Hong, W., (2006), Technology Hippel, E., 1987. Cooperation between
rivals: informal know-how trading. Research Policy 16, 291-302.
[34] Paul C. Irwin Crookes, 2009,"China-s embrace of the market economy:
understanding its innovation strategy", European View 8:133-141
[35] Freeman, R. E., The Stakeholder Approach Revisited, Zeitschrift f├╝r
Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2004, pp. 228-241.