Exploration and Exploitation within Operations

Exploration and exploitation capabilities are both important within Operations as means for improvement when managed separately, and for establishing dynamic improvement capabilities when combined in balance. However, it is unclear what exploration and exploitation capabilities imply in improvement and development work within an Operations context. So, in order to better understand how to develop exploration and exploitation capabilities within Operations, the main characteristics of these constructs needs to be identified and further understood. Thus, the objective of this research is to increase the understanding about exploitation and exploration characteristics, to concretize what they translates to within the context of improvement and development work in an Operations unit, and to identify practical challenges. A literature review and a case study are presented. In the literature review, different interpretations of exploration and exploitation are portrayed, key characteristics have been identified, and a deepened understanding of exploration and exploitation characteristics is described. The case in the study is an Operations unit, and the aim is to explore to what extent and in what ways exploration and exploitation activities are part of the improvement structures and processes. The contribution includes an identification of key characteristics of exploitation and exploration, as well as an interpretation of the constructs. Further, some practical challenges are identified. For instance, exploration activities tend to be given low priority, both in daily work as in the manufacturing strategy. Also, the overall understanding about the concepts of exploitation and exploration (or any similar aspect of dynamic improvement capabilities) is very low.

Authors:

• D. Gåsvaer
• L. Stålberg
• A. Fundin
• M. Jackson
• P. Johansson

Keywords:

• Exploitation
• Exploration
• Improvement
• Lean production
• Manufacturing.

References:

[1] T. A. Stewart and A. P. Raman, "Lessons from Toyota´s Long Drive,"
Harvard Business Review, vol. 85, pp. 74-83, 2007.
[2] Y. Yamamoto, "Kaikaku in production," Licentiate thesis, School of
innovation, design, and engineering, Mälardalen University, Västerås,
2010.
[3] D. Gåsvaer and J. von Axelson, "Kaikaku - Radical improvement in
production," presented at the International Conference on Operations
and Maintenance, Singapore, 2012.
[4] H. Boer and F. Gertsen, "From continuous improvement to continuous
innovation: a (retro)(per)spective," International Journal of Technology
Management, vol. 26, pp. 805-827, 2003.
[5] J. Bessant, S. Caffyn, and M. Gallagher, "An evolutionary model of
continuous improvement behaviour," Technovation, vol. 21, pp. 67-77,
2001.
[6] A. Martini, B. T. Laugen, L. Gastaldi, and M. Corso, "Continuous
innovation: Towards a paradoxical, ambidextrous combination of
exploration and exploitation," International Journal of Technology
Management, vol. 61, pp. 1-22, 2013.
[7] A. Hill and T. Hill, Manufacturing operations strategy: Palgrave
Macmillan, 2009.
[8] M. J. Benner and M. L. Tushman, "Exploitation, exploration, and
process management: The productivity dilemma revisited," Academy of
management review, vol. 28, pp. 238-256, 2003.
[9] J. G. March, "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning,"
Organization science, vol. 2, pp. 71-87, 1991.
[10] D. I. Jacobsen and J. Thorsvik, Hur moderna organisationer fungerar:
Studentlitteratur, 2014.
[11] L. Stålberg, "A supportive framework for successful implementation of
improvement work," ed: Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden,
2014.
[12] D. Gåsvaer, "Towards radical improvement in production systems,"
Licentiate Licentiate thesis, Department of Product Realization,
Malardalen University, 2013.
[13] V. Ambrosini and C. Bowman, "What are dynamic capabilities and are
they a useful construct in strategic management?," International Journal
of Management Reviews, vol. 11, pp. 29-49, 2009.
[14] C. O'Reilly and M. Tushman, "Organizational ambidexterity: Past,
present and future," The Academy of Management Perspectives, p. amp.
2013.0025, 2013.
[15] S. B. Merriam, Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and
Implementation. Revised and Expanded from Qualitative Research and
Case Study Applications in Education. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,
2009.
[16] J. G. March, "Continuity and change in theories of organizational
action," Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 278-287, 1996.
[17] D. A. Levinthal and J. G. March, "The myopia of learning," Strategic
management journal, vol. 14, pp. 95-112, 1993.
[18] R. Almahendra and B. Ambos, "Exploration and exploitation: a 20-year
review of evolution and reconceptualisation," International Journal of
Innovation Management, 2014.
[19] D. Lavie, U. Stettner, and M. L. Tushman, "Exploration and exploitation
within and across organizations," The Academy of Management Annals,
vol. 4, pp. 109-155, 2010.
[20] D. Lavie and L. Rosenkopf, "Balancing exploration and exploitation in
alliance formation," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, pp. 797-
818, 2006.
[21] Y. Li, W. Vanhaverbeke, and W. Schoenmakers, "Exploration and
exploitation in innovation: Reframing the interpretation," Creativity and
innovation management, vol. 17, pp. 107-126, 2008.
[22] A. K. Gupta, K. G. Smith, and C. E. Shalley, "The interplay between
exploration and exploitation," Academy of management journal, vol. 49,
pp. 693-706, 2006.
[23] G. Ahuja and R. Katila, "Where do resources come from? The role of
idiosyncratic situations," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 25, pp.
887-907, 2004.
[24] N. Argyres, "Capabilities, technological diversification and
divisionalization," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, pp. 395-410,
1996.
[25] K. Atuahene-Gima, "Resolving the capability—rigidity paradox in new
product innovation," Journal of marketing, vol. 69, pp. 61-83, 2005.
[26] S. Auh and B. Menguc, "Balancing exploration and exploitation: The
moderating role of competitive intensity," Journal of Business Research,
vol. 58, pp. 1652-1661, 2005.
[27] J. A. Baum, S. X. Li, and J. M. Usher, "Making the next move: How
experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains'
acquisitions," Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 45, pp. 766-801,
2000.
[28] C. M. Beckman, "The influence of founding team company affiliations
on firm behavior," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, pp. 741-
758, 2006.
[29] M. J. Benner and M. Tushman, "Process management and technological
innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint
industries," Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 47, pp. 676-707,
2002.
[30] P. E. Bierly and P. S. Daly, "Alternative knowledge strategies,
competitive environment, and organizational performance in small
manufacturing firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 31,
pp. 493-516, 2007.
[31] H. Boer, J. Kuhn, and F. Gertsen, "Continuous innovation: managing
dualities through co-ordination," Continuous Innovation Network. WPS,
vol. 1, 2006.
[32] K. Chaharbaghi, "The problematic of strategy: a way of seeing is also a
way of not seeing," Management Decision, vol. 45, pp. 327-339, 2007.
[33] C. B. Gibson and J. Birkinshaw, "The antecedents, consequences, and
mediating role of organizational ambidexterity," Academy of
management Journal, vol. 47, pp. 209-226, 2004.
[34] Z. L. He and P. K. Wong, "Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical
test of the ambidexterity hypothesis," Organization Science, vol. 15, pp.
481-495, 2004.
[35] M. Holmqvist, "A dynamic model of intra-and interorganizational
learning," Organization studies, vol. 24, pp. 95-123, 2003.
[36] J. J. Jansen, F. A. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda, "Exploratory
innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of
organizational antecedents and environmental moderators," Management
science, vol. 52, pp. 1661-1674, 2006.
[37] K. D. Miller, M. Zhao, and R. J. Calantone, "Adding interpersonal
learning and tacit knowledge to March's exploration-exploitation
model," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, pp. 709-722, 2006.
[38] T. J. Mom, F. A. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda, "Investigating
Managers' Exploration and Exploitation Activities: The Influence of
Top‐Down, Bottom‐Up, and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows*," Journal
of Management Studies, vol. 44, pp. 910-931, 2007.
[39] F. Perretti and G. Negro, "Filling empty seats: How status and
organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team
design," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, pp. 759-777, 2006.
[40] C. Prange and B. B. Schlegelmilch, "The role of ambidexterity in
marketing strategy implementation: Resolving the explorationexploitation
dilemma," BuR-Business Research, vol. 2, pp. 215-240,
2009.
[41] L. Rosenkopf and A. Nerkar, "Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning,
exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry," Strategic
Management Journal, vol. 22, pp. 287-306, 2001.
[42] A. Taylor and H. R. Greve, "Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge
combination and experience in innovative teams," Academy of
Management Journal, vol. 49, pp. 723-740, 2006.
[43] F. Vermeulen and H. Barkema, "Learning through acquisitions,"
Academy of Management journal, vol. 44, pp. 457-476, 2001.
[44] T. Netland, "Exploring the phenomenon of company-specific production
systems: one-best-way or own-best-way?," International Journal of
Production Research, vol. 51, pp. 1084-1097, 2013.