Expanding Affordable Housing through Inclusionary Zoning in the City of Toronto

Reasonably priced and well-constructed housing must be an integral and element supporting a healthy society. The absence of housing everyone in society can afford negatively affects the people's health, education, ability to get jobs, develop their community. Without access to decent housing, economic development, integration of immigrants and inclusiveness, the society is negatively impacted. Canada has a sterling record in creating housing compared to many other nations around the globe. Canadian housing gets support from a mature and responsive mortgage network and a top-quality construction industry as well as safe and excellent quality building materials that are readily available. Yet 1.7 million Canadian households occupy substandard abodes. During the past hundred years, Canada's government has made a wide variety of attempts to provide decent residential facilities every Canadian can afford. Despite these laudable efforts, today Canada is left with housing that is inadequate for many Canadians. People who own their housing are given all kinds of privileges and perks, while people with relatively low incomes who rent their apartments or houses are discriminated against. To help solve these problems, zoning that is based on an "inclusionary" philosophy is tool developed to help provide people the affordable residences that they need. No, thirty years after its introduction, this type of zoning has been shown effective in helping build and provide Canadians with a houses or apartments they can afford to pay for. Using this form of zoning can have different results +depending on where and how it is used. After examining Canadian affordable housing and four American cases where this type of zoning was enforced in the USA, this makes various recommendations for expanding Canadians' access to housing they can afford.

Authors:

• Sam Moshaver

Keywords:

• Affordable Housing
• Inclusionary Zoning Low- Income Housing
• Toronto Housing.

References:

[1] A. Jackson, "Home truths: why the housing system matters to all
Canadians" CHRA and CCPA, 2004, page3.
[2] T. Carter, "Current practices for procuring affordable housing: The
Canadian Context" Housing policy debate, volume 8, Issue 3, 2009, pp.
593-631.
[3] J.D. Hulchanski, "Rethinking Canada-s affordable housing challenge, a
discussion paper prepared for the government of Canada-s
CanadianHousing framework initiative", University of Toronto, pp. 10-
14
[4] A. Jackson, "Home truths: why the housing system matters to all
Canadians" CHRA and CCPA, 2004, page1.
[5] Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation, "Canadian Housing
Observer 2009". Ottawa, CHMC, 2009.
[6] J.D. Hulchanski, "Rethinking Canada-s affordable housing challenge, a
discussion paper prepared for the government of Canada-s
CandianHouing framework initiative", University of Toronto, pp. 10-14
[7] T. Carter, "Current practices for procuring affordable housing: The
Canadian Context" Housing policy debate, volume 8 ,Issue 3, 2009, pp.
250-254.
[8] A. Rose, "Canadian Housing policies 195-1980" Toronto, Butterworths,
1980.
[9] T. Carter, "Current practices for procuring affordable housing: The
Canadian Context" Housing policy debate, volume 8, Issue 3, 2009, pp.
593-631.
[10] N. Bradford, "why cities matter: policy research perspectives for
Canada". Ottawa, Canadian policy research networks, 2002,
[11] City of Toronto. 2006b. Perspectives on Housing Tenure.
from:www.toronto.ca/planning/pdf/housing_tenure.pdf. Reviewed Jan
18, 2013.
[12] Toronto Community Foundation. 2008. Toronto Vital Signs, From:
www.tcf.ca/Portals/0/docs/Toronto%27sVitalSigns2008.V6A.TCFWeb
%284%29.pdf. Reviewed Jan 19, 2013.
[13] J. Hackworth. 2008. The Durability of Roll-Out Neoliberalism under
Centre-Left Governance: The Case of Ontario-s Social Housing Sector,
Studies in Political EconomyVol. 81: 7-26.
[14] City of Toronto. 2007b. Consolidated Section 37 Implementation
Guidelines and Protocol for Negotiating Section 37 Community
Benefits. From,
www.toronto.ca/planning/pdf/s37_consolidation_080117.pdf. Retrieved
Jan 8, 2013.
[15] Devine, P. 2008. Section 37: An Update on "Let-s Make a Deal
Planning." Fraser, Milner, Casgrain LLP. Retrieved Jan 24, 2013 from
www.fmclaw.
com/upload/en/publications/2008/RealEstate_Mar2008_Devine_Sli
wa_Section37.pdf.
[16] A.F. Schwartz. Housing policy in the Untied States. New York, NY:
Routledge, 2010, pp.123-128.
[17] G.J. Knaap, H. Haccou, K.J. Clifton. Incentives, Regulations and plans.
Maryland, Annapolis, 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. pp. 52-58.
[18] K.D. Brown. "Expanding affordable housing through inclusionary
zoning: lesson from the Washington Metropolitan Area" The Brookings
Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. New York, 2001,
[19] G.J. Knaap, H. Haccou, K.J. Clifton. Incentives, Regulations and plans.
Maryland, Annapolis, 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. pp. 52-58.
[20] A.F. Schwartz. Housing policy in the Untied States. New York, NY:
Routledge, 2010, pp.123-128.
[21] T. Carter, "Current practices for procuring affordable housing: The
Canadian Context" Housing policy debate, volume 8, Issue 3, 2009, pp.
585-587.
[22] S. Levine, L.Goldberg, N.Brunick, Large cities and inclusionary zoning,
Washington D.C, 2003.
[23] M.Rosen, W.Sulivan, "From urban renewal and displacement to
economic inclusion: San Francisco affordable housing policy 1978-
2012, poverty and race research action council" San Francisco , 2013
[24] J.Schuetz, R.Meltzer, V.Been, The effects of Inclusionary Zoning on
Local Housing Market: Lessons for the San Francisco, Washington and
Boston areas. Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New
York University, 2007.
[25] Research Highlights, issue 46. Municipal Regulatory Initiatives:
Providing for Affordable Housing. CMHC
[26] D.Rusk, Nine lessons for Inclusionary Zoning", keynote remarks of
David Rusk on the National Inclusionary housing conference,
Washington, DC, 2005.
[27] D.Rusk, He who pays the piper. Innovative housing Institute, 2008.
[28] J.Schuetz, R.Meltzer, V.Been, The effects of Inclusionary Zoning on
Local Housing Market: Lessons for the San Francisco, Washington and
Boston areas. Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New
York University, 2007.
[29] Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Barristers & Solicitors, Ontario
Expropriations Association Annual Caselaw Update October 25-26,
2012.
[30] J. Gladki, S.Pomeroy, Implementing the inclusionary policy to facilitate
affordable housing in. Ontario, Ontarionon-profit housing association,
Toronto, 2007.
[31] San Diego Housing Commission, Retrieved Jan 11, 2009 from,
http://www.sdhc.net/Real-Estate/Developers/Inclusionary-Housing-
Requirements/.
[32] Policy link, Increasing housing opportunity in New York City, Pratt
institute for community and environmental development, New York,
2004.
[33] G.J. Knaap, H. Haccou, K.J. Clifton. Incentives, Regulations and plans.
Maryland, Annapolis, 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. pp. 52-58.
[34] S. Levine, L.Goldberg, N.Brunick, Large cities and inclusionary zoning,
Washington D.C, 2003.
[35] CMHC,Average market rents and affordable housing. Reviewed Jan, 09,
2013 from http://www.toronto.ca/housing/ social_housing/
otherdocs/avmarketrent_ahp.pdf
[36] G.J. Knaap, H. Haccou, K.J. Clifton. Incentives, Regulations and plans.
Maryland, Annapolis, 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. pp. 52-58.